Dataset Information

Door to door in 24: factors that allow surgical stabilization of rib fractures within 24 hours of admission.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) should be performed early after injury. Factors that influence timing remain unknown. Our objective was to identify inherent variables that allow for early identification and treatment. We hypothesized that certain demographic, injury, and logistical factors are associated with SSRF <24 hours from admission.

Methods

Retrospective review from an urban level 1 trauma center (10/2010-8/2019). Patients were grouped as SSRF <24 hours from admission vs. ≥24 hours. Demographics, transfer from an outside hospital (OSH), timing documentation, injury descriptors, surgeon on-call, and operative surgeon were collected. SSRF for chronic non-union was excluded.

Results

Data from 173 patients were analyzed. Eighty-five patients (49%) were in the <24 hours group and 88 (51%) were in the ≥24 hours group. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Injury severity was significantly higher in the late group: increased Injury Severity Score (ISS; 16.5 vs. 21.0, P<0.01), lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS; 15 vs. 14, P<0.01), more rib fractures (7 vs. 9, P=0.01), and increased incidence of face (6% vs. 16%, P=0.03), spine (22% vs. 47%, P<0.01), and pelvis fractures (8% vs. 25%, P<0.01). Patients admitted on a Wednesday were more likely to undergo early SSRF as compared to other days of the week (P=0.01) There was also a shorter time from the decision to perform SSRF to the actual operation in the early group, as compared to the late group (13 vs. 44 hours, P<0.01). Fifty (28.9%) SSRF cases were performed by the on-call surgeon; this percentage did not differ in the early vs. late group (33% vs. 25%, P=0.25). Patients needing pelvic fixation were more likely to be in the late group. Patients transferred from an OSH for SSRF were more likely to be in the early group (29% vs. 10%, P<0.01). Finally, likelihood of early surgery increased with increasing study year.

Conclusions

Approximately one-half of SSRF cases were performed within 24 hours of admission. Factors that influence surgery within 24 hours of admission appear related to overall injury severity and systems issues, including day of admission, transfer from another facility, additional urgent pelvic surgery, and institutional experience with SSRF. Surgeon availability did not drive this disparity.

SUBMITTER: Leasia K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10713285 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Door to door in 24: factors that allow surgical stabilization of rib fractures within 24 hours of admission.

Leasia Kiara K Prins Jonne T H JTH Lawless Ryan R Burlew Clay Cothren CC Moore Ernest E EE Platnick Barry B Karamsetty Lakshmipriya L Pieracci Fredric M FM

Journal of thoracic disease 20231009 11

<h4>Background</h4>Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) should be performed early after injury. Factors that influence timing remain unknown. Our objective was to identify inherent variables that allow for early identification and treatment. We hypothesized that certain demographic, injury, and logistical factors are associated with SSRF <24 hours from admission.<h4>Methods</h4>Retrospective review from an urban level 1 trauma center (10/2010-8/2019). Patients were grouped as SSRF <24 ...[more]

PMID: 38090313

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRib fractures are common in trauma patients, often leading to complications such as pneumonia and prolonged hospitalization. Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSRF) has become increasingly prevalent in treating severe cases. However, traditional approaches, like posterolateral thoracotomy, are invasive and cause significant muscle damage. Recently, muscle-sparing minimally invasive techniques have been introduced, yet they still require advanced reduction and fixation techniques to avoid complications. This study presents an "ultra" minimally invasive SSRF (uMI-SSRF) technique designed to minimize surgical wounds and soft tissue damage while maintaining the benefits of rib fixation.MethodsThis study involved 76 patients with multiple rib fractures treated using the uMI-SSRF technique between August 2021 and December 2023. Preoperative chest tomography with 3D reconstruction was used for surgical planning. The technique employed small incisions (3-5 cm), muscle-sparing approaches, and advanced fixation techniques. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected.ResultsThe mean patient age was 58 years, with 66% being male. On average, patients had 6.4 fractured ribs, and 3.5 ribs with 3.88 plates were fixed per surgery, achieving a fixation/fracture ratio of 59%. The average wound length was 4.2 cm, with a mean operation time of 122 min. Most patients required only one incision (74%). The median hospital length of stay was 7 days, with a pneumonia rate of 5%. No wound infections or implant-related complications were observed.ConclusionsThe uMI-SSRF technique effectively reduces wound size and soft tissue damage in rib fracture stabilization while maintaining high fixation quality. This method shows promise for improving patient outcomes, reducing recovery time, and minimizing complications. Further studies with larger sample sizes and comparisons with other methods are warranted to verify the advantages of uMI-SSRF.

Project description:BackgroundHow the surgical stabilization of rib fractures after trauma affects the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome and impacts survival has yet to be determined in a large database. We hypothesized that surgical stabilization of rib fractures would not decrease the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome.MethodsThe National Trauma Data Bank was queried for all traumatic rib fractures in 2016. Patients were divided into groups with single rib fractures, multiple rib fractures, and flail chest. Nonoperative therapy was compared with stabilization of rib fractures of 1 to 2 ribs or 3+ ribs.ResultsThere were 114,972 total patients with rib fractures meeting inclusion criteria, with 5,106 (4.4%) having flail chest, 24,726 (21.5%) having single rib fractures, and 85,140 (74.1%) having multiple rib fractures. Those with flail chest (15.9%) were most likely to get rib plating in comparison to multiple rib fractures (0.9%) and single rib fractures (0.2%); P < .001. On logistic regression, surgical stabilization of rib fractures 1 to 2 ribs (odds ratio: 0.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.28) or 3+ ribs (odds ratio: 0.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.28), with nonoperative therapy as the reference was associated with survival. Variables associated with mortality included increasing age, male sex, increasing injury severity score, decreased Glasgow coma scale, requirement of transfusions, and hypotension on admission. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures 3+ ribs (odds ratio: 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-3.37) was associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome but not 1 to 2 ribs (odd ratio: 1.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-2.48). On logistic regression of only patients with flail chest, stabilization of rib fractures was associated with decreased mortality but not increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome.ConclusionThe increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome should be considered in the preoperative assessment for stabilization of rib fractures.

Project description:BackgroundThere is no consensus on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization in multiple rib fractures in Asia, especially among patients with a non-flail rib fracture pattern. We aim to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in an Asian population with multiple non-flail rib fractures.MethodsThe MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched in this systematic literature review and meta-analysis to identify studies conducted in Asia that included patients with multiple non-flail rib fractures in at least one of their treatment groups. The intervention of interest was SSRF, and the comparator was a nonoperative treatment. The duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) was the primary outcome. Posttreatment pain score, pneumonia, atelectasis, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (HLOS), need for tracheostomy, respiratory function, functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and mortality were identified as the secondary outcomes. A random effects model (REM) was used to pool data for outcomes reported in two or more studies.ResultsA total of 12 studies (n=2,440 patients) were included. There was a significantly shorter DMV {mean difference (MD): -5.23 [95% confidence interval (CI): -9.64 to -0.81], P=0.02}, lower 4-week post-treatment pain score [standard mean difference (SMD): -2.24 (95% CI: -3.18 to -1.31), P<0.00001], lower risk for pneumonia [risk ratio (RR): 0.46 (95% CI: 0.23 to 0.95), P=0.04], lower risk for atelectasis [RR: 0.44, (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.65), P<0.0001], shorter ICU LOS [MD: -4.00 (95% CI: -6.33 to -1.66), P=0.0008], and shorter HLOS [MD: -6.54 (95% CI: -9.28 to -3.79), P<0.00001] in favor of SSRF. Effect estimates for the need for tracheostomy [RR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42 to 1.08), P=0.10] and mortality [RR: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.37 to 2.41), P=0.90] were nonsignificant.ConclusionsIn the Asian population with mainly non-flail rib fracture patterns, SSRF was associated with shorter DMV, ICU LOS, and HLOS as well as lower risks for atelectasis and pneumonia, and pain scores after 4 weeks. The risk of mortality was comparable between treatment groups.

Dataset Information

Door to door in 24: factors that allow surgical stabilization of rib fractures within 24 hours of admission.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Door to door in 24: factors that allow surgical stabilization of rib fractures within 24 hours of admission.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets