Dataset Information

Retracted: Chest digital dynamic radiography to detect changes in human pulmonary perfusion in response to alveolar hypoxia.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction optimises oxygenation in the lung by matching the local-blood perfusion to local-ventilation ratio upon exposure to alveolar hypoxia. It plays an important role in various pulmonary diseases, but few imaging evaluations of this phenomenon in humans. This study aimed to determine whether chest digital dynamic radiography could detect hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction as changes in pulmonary blood flow in healthy individuals.

Methods

Five Asian men underwent chest digital dynamic radiography before and after 60 sec breath-holding at the maximal inspiratory level in upright and supine positions. Alveolar partial pressure of oxygen and atmospheric pressure were calculated using the blood gas test and digital dynamic radiography imaging, respectively. To evaluate the blood flow, the correlation rate of temporal change in each pixel value between the lung fields and left cardiac ventricles was analysed.

Results

Sixty seconds of breath-holding caused a mean reduction of 26.7 ± 6.4 mmHg in alveolar partial pressure of oxygen. The mean correlation rate of blood flow in the whole lung was significantly lower after than before breath-holding (before, upright 51.5%, supine 52.2%; after, upright 45.5%, supine 46.1%; both P < 0.05). The correlation rate significantly differed before and after breath-holding in the lower lung fields (upright, 11.8% difference; supine, 10.7% difference; both P < 0.05). The mean radiation exposure of each scan was 0.98 ± 0.09 mGy. No complications occurred.

Conclusions

Chest digital dynamic radiography could detect the rapid decrease in pulmonary perfusion in response to alveolar hypoxia. It may suggest hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in healthy individuals.

SUBMITTER: Yamamoto S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10715373 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Retracted: Chest digital dynamic radiography to detect changes in human pulmonary perfusion in response to alveolar hypoxia.

Yamamoto Shota S Sakamaki Fumio F Takahashi Genki G Kondo Yusuke Y Taguchi Naoya N Esashi Shogo S Yuji Ryotaro R Murakami Katsuki K Osaragi Kensuke K Tomita Kosuke K Kamei Shunsuke S Matsumoto Tomohiro T Imai Yutaka Y Hasebe Terumitsu T

Journal of medical radiation sciences 20220913 4

<h4>Introduction</h4>Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction optimises oxygenation in the lung by matching the local-blood perfusion to local-ventilation ratio upon exposure to alveolar hypoxia. It plays an important role in various pulmonary diseases, but few imaging evaluations of this phenomenon in humans. This study aimed to determine whether chest digital dynamic radiography could detect hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction as changes in pulmonary blood flow in healthy individuals.<h4>Methods</h4> ...[more]

PMID: 36101943

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAccurate prediction of postoperative pulmonary function is important for ensuring the safety of patients undergoing radical resection for lung cancer. Dynamic perfusion digital radiography is an excellent and easy imaging method for detecting blood flow in the lung compared with the less-convenient conventional lung perfusion scintigraphy. As such, the present study aimed to confirm whether dynamic perfusion digital radiography can be evaluated in comparison with pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting early postoperative pulmonary function and complications.MethodsDynamic perfusion digital radiography and spirometry were performed before and 1 and 3 months after radical resection for lung cancer. Correlation coefficients between blood flow ratios calculated using dynamic perfusion digital radiography and pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy were then confirmed in the same cases. In all patients who underwent dynamic perfusion digital radiography, the correlation predicted values calculated from the blood flow ratio, and measured values were examined. Furthermore, ppo%FEV1 or ppo%DLco values, which indicated the risk for perioperative complications, were examined.ResultsA total of 52 participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Blood flow ratios measured using pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and dynamic perfusion digital radiography showed excellent correlation and acceptable predictive accuracy. Correlation coefficients between predicted FEV1 values obtained from dynamic perfusion digital radiography or pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and actual measured values were similar. All patients who underwent dynamic perfusion digital radiography showed excellent correlation between predicted values and those measured using spirometry. A significant difference in ppo%DLco was observed for respiratory complications but not cardiovascular complications.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that dynamic perfusion digital radiography can be a suitable alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy given its ability for predicting postoperative values and the risk for postoperative respiratory complications. Furthermore, it seemed to be an excellent modality because of its advantages, such as simplicity, low cost, and ease in obtaining in-depth respiratory functional information.Trial registrationRegistered at UMIN on October 25, 2017. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000033957 Registration number: UMIN000029716.

Project description:BackgroundAccurate perioperative risk assessment can enhance the perioperative management of patients undergoing radical surgery for lung cancer. In this study, we compared the accuracy of predicting perioperative complications by lung function values, estimated by blood flow ratios (BFRs), to determine whether dynamic perfusion digital radiography (DPDR) could substitute for pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy (PPS).MethodsPatients scheduled for radical surgery for lung cancer who underwent simultaneous dynamic chest radiography (DCR) and lung perfusion scintigraphy were assessed. We confirmed the agreement between two methods in the assessment of the BFR and its predicted postoperative (ppo) value. Besides, the best spirometry thresholds for the risk of perioperative respiratory or cardiovascular complications were calculated from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The imaging methods were compared for sensitivity and specificity.ResultsAmong the 44 cases enrolled, DPDR and PPS showed high correlations in BFR (r=0.868, P<0.01) and its postoperative value (r=0.975, P<0.01) and between the predicted and measured spirometry values. In both imaging modalities, the estimated postoperative diffusing capacity test for carbon monoxide (DLco) had the best prediction [area under the curve (AUC) >0.7] for respiratory complications within 1 month (with different cut-offs for same target cases). For predicting, respiratory complications within 1-3 months after surgery, these values were similar between two modalities. Furthermore, the ppoDLco values from both imaging methods were excellent indicators of the induction of postoperative long term oxygen therapy, with the AUC greater than 0.8.ConclusionsThis study showed that simple and less invasive DPDR can be a good alternative to PPS for predicting postoperative pulmonary function values and the risk of postoperative respiratory complications. This new imaging modality will offer new insights and possible functional analyses of pulmonary circulation.

Project description:Purpose To conduct a multi-institutional, multireader study to compare the performance of digital tomosynthesis, dual-energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and management. Materials and Methods In this binational, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 158 subjects (43 subjects with normal findings) were enrolled at four institutions. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. Subjects underwent chest computed tomography (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imaging, and tomosynthesis with a flat-panel imaging device. Three experienced thoracic radiologists identified true locations of nodules (n = 516, 3-20-mm diameters) with CT and recommended case management by using Fleischner Society guidelines. Five other radiologists marked nodules and indicated case management by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and tomosynthesis plus DE imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy were measured by using the free-response receiver operating characteristic method and the receiver operating characteristic method for nodule detection and case management, respectively. Results were further analyzed according to nodule diameter categories (3-4 mm, >4 mm to 6 mm, >6 mm to 8 mm, and >8 mm to 20 mm). Results Maximum lesion localization fraction was higher for tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fold for all nodules, P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.96, 4.15). Case-level sensitivity was higher with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.73). Case management decisions showed better overall accuracy with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (1.23-fold, P < .001; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.32). There were no differences in any specificity measures. DE imaging did not significantly affect nodule detection when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis. Conclusion Tomosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determination of case management; DE imaging did not show significant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone. These findings indicate performance likely achievable with a range of reader expertise. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Dataset Information

Retracted: Chest digital dynamic radiography to detect changes in human pulmonary perfusion in response to alveolar hypoxia.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Retracted: Chest digital dynamic radiography to detect changes in human pulmonary perfusion in response to alveolar hypoxia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets