Project description:Interest in percutaneous mitral valve repair has increased during recent years. This is mainly driven by the significant number of patients being declined for mitral valve surgery because of a high risk of surgery-related complications or death. In this subset of patients, percutaneous edge-to-edge repair using the MitraClip device (Abbott, Menlo Park, CA, USA) has become an established treatment option, proven to be safe, efficient and associated with improved functional status. In contrast to primary mitral regurgitation (MR), clinical outcomes after mitral valve surgery appear to be less favourable as regards secondary MR due to heart failure. In the MITRA-FR and COAPT trials, patients with moderate to severe and severe secondary MR with reduced left ventricular function received either medical treatment (control group) or MitraClip implantation plus medical treatment (device group). Results were conflicting, with only the COAPT trial showing better clinical outcomes in the device group. However, both trials are now seen as complementary and provide useful information especially regarding patient selection for MitraClip therapy. The goal of this review is to delineate which subset of patients with secondary MR will potentially benefit from percutaneous mitral valve repair.
Project description:AimsTranscatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has gained widespread use for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in symptomatic patients with high operative risk. Although secondary TR is the most common pathology, some patients exhibit primary or predominantly primary TR. Characterization of patients with these pathologies in the T-TEER context has not been systematically performed.Methods and resultsPatients assigned to T-TEER by the interdisciplinary heart team were consecutively recruited in two European centres over 4 years. Echocardiographic images were evaluated to distinguish between primary and secondary causes of TR. Both groups were compared concerning procedural results. A total of 339 patients were recruited, 13% with primary TR and 87% with secondary TR. Patients with primary TR had a smaller right ventricle (basal diameter 45 vs. 49 mm, P = 0.004), a better right ventricular function (fractional area change 45 vs. 41%, P = 0.001), a smaller right (28 vs. 34 cm2, P = 0.021) and left (52 vs. 67 mL/m2, P = 0.038) atrium, and a better left ventricular ejection fraction (60 vs. 52%, P = 0.005). The severity of TR was similar in primary and secondary TR at baseline (TR vena contracta width pre-interventional 13 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 5 mm, P = 0.19), and T-TEER significantly reduced TR in both groups (TR vena contracta width post-interventional 4 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 5 mm, P = 0.10). These findings remained stable after propensity score matching. Complications were similar between both groups.ConclusionT-TEER confers equally safe and effective reduction of TR in patients with primary and secondary TR.
Project description:BackgroundImpaired hospitalizations for heart failure (HHF) and mortality are associated with tricuspid regurgitation (TR).ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) over guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with symptomatic severe TR.MethodsBetween May 2020 and April 2023, 88 patients with symptomatic severe TR were treated in our center. Of these, 57 patients received GDMT alone, and 31 patients underwent combined TTVR and GDMT. We collected and analyzed baseline data, and follow-up information for both groups. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint (including all-cause mortality and HHF).ResultsAt a median follow-up of 20 (IQR 10-29) months, significant improvements were shown in TR severity, right ventricular function, and dimensions in TTVR group (all P < 0.001). It also resulted in superior survival rates (75.8% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.019), improved freedom from combined endpoint (61.5% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.007) and fewer major adverse events. After stratification by TRI-SCORE, the subgroup with < 6 points in the TTVR group exhibited a significant difference in the combined endpoint compared to the other subgroups (all P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the GDMT subgroups (P = 0.680).ConclusionsThe utilization of LuX-Valve in TTVR effectively improves TR and is associated with lower rates of major adverse events, HHF and all-cause mortality. The TRI-SCORE may help identify higher-benefit patients with TR from TTVR. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System (NCT02917980).
Project description:Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is present in 1.6 million individuals in the United States and 3.0 million people in Europe. Functional TR, the most common form of TR, is caused by cardiomyopathies, LV valve disease, or pulmonary disease. The five-year survival with severe TR and HFrEF is 34%. Echocardiography can assess the TR etiology/severity, measure RA and RV size and function, estimate pulmonary pressure, and characterize LV disease. Management includes diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists. Surgical annuloplasty or valve replacement should be considered in patients with progressive RV dilatation without severe LV dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. Transcatheter repair/replacement is possible in patients with a LVEF <40%, dilated annuli, and impaired RV function. The diagnosis and treatment of TR, including coaptation, annuloplasty devices and prosthetic valves, success rates, morbidity/mortality, and trials are discussed. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair/replacement is an emerging therapy for high-risk patients with TR who would otherwise have a dismal clinical prognosis.
Project description:Background and objectivesTricuspid valve (TV) repair techniques other than annuloplasty remain challenging and frequently end in tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in complicated cases. However, the results of TVR are suboptimal compared with TV repair. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of TV edge-to-edge repair (E2E) compared to TVR for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 230 patients with severe TR who underwent E2E (n=139) or TVR (n=91) from 2001 to 2020. Clinical and echocardiographic results were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis and propensity score matching.ResultsThe two groups showed no significant differences in early mortality and morbidities. During the mean follow-up of 106.2±68.8 months, late severe TR and TV reoperation rates were not significantly different between groups. E2E group, however, showed better outcomes in overall survival (p=0.023), freedom from significant tricuspid stenosis (TS) (trans-tricuspid pressure gradient ≥5 mmHg, p=0.021), and freedom from TV-related events (p<0.001). Matched analysis showed consistent results.ConclusionsE2E for severe TR presented more favorable clinical outcomes than TVR. Our study supports that E2E might be a valuable option in severe TR surgery, avoiding TVR.
Project description:AimTricuspid regurgitation secondary to heart failure (HF) is common with considerable impact on survival and hospitalization rates. Currently, insights into epidemiology, impact, and treatment of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) across the entire HF spectrum are lacking, yet are necessary for healthcare decision-making.Methods and resultsThis population-based study included data from 13 469 patients with HF and sTR from the Viennese community over a 10-year period. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Overall, HF with preserved ejection fraction was the most frequent (57%, n = 7733) HF subtype and the burden of comorbidities was high. Severe sTR was present in 1514 patients (11%), most common among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (20%, n = 496). Mortality of patients with sTR was higher than expected survival of sex- and age-matched community and independent of HF subtype (moderate sTR: hazard ratio [HR] 6.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.88-6.80, p < 0.001; severe sTR: HR 9.04; 95% CI 8.27-9.87, p < 0.001). In comparison to HF and no/mild sTR patients, mortality increased for moderate sTR (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.48-1.69, p < 0.001) and for severe sTR (HR 2.19, 95% CI 2.01-2.38, p < 0.001). This effect prevailed after multivariate adjustment and was similar across all HF subtypes. In subgroup analysis, severe sTR mortality risk was more pronounced in younger patients (<70 years). Moderate and severe sTR were rarely treated (3%, n = 147), despite availability of state-of-the-art facilities and universal health care.ConclusionSecondary tricuspid regurgitation is frequent, increasing with age and associated with excess mortality independent of HF subtype. Nevertheless, sTR is rarely treated surgically or percutaneously. With the projected increase in HF prevalence and population ageing, the data suggest a major burden for healthcare systems that needs to be adequately addressed. Low-risk transcatheter treatment options may provide a suitable alternative.
Project description:Traumatic tricuspid valve injury is rare, accounting for 0.02% of traumatic injuries. The majority of cases result from blunt force trauma to the chest, however penetrating injuries have been documented in literature. Patients' can be in the full spectrum of disease, from asymptomatic to cardiogenic shock. Indications for surgery include right heart failure or evidence of right heart volume overload in the setting of significant tricuspid regurgitation. Early surgical repair is warranted to preserve right ventricular function. Surgery also needs to be planned in conjunction with the patients' other injuries. In some cases, it may be beneficial for surgery to be delayed whilst the patient is closely observed, in order for the patient to recover from concomitant injuries. We report two cases of tricuspid regurgitation in the context of blunt trauma, and our approach to the management of these patients.
Project description:A 27-year-old man admitted with tricuspid valve endocarditis with a large vegetation, persistent bacteremia, and pulmonary and systemic septic embolization was deemed not a suitable surgical candidate. He underwent percutaneous vegetation debulking using the AngioVac system. The patient defervesced post-operatively with clinical improvement but with abruptly worsened tricuspid regurgitation. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).