Dataset Information

Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Radiomics has recently received considerable research attention for providing potential prognostic biomarkers for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the methodological quality and prognostic prediction value of radiomic studies for predicting survival outcomes in patients with LARC.

Methods

The Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched. The radiomics quality score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist, the Image Biomarkers Standardization Initiative (IBSI) guideline, and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were used to assess the quality of the selected studies. A further meta-analysis of hazard ratio (HR) regarding disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed.

Results

Among the 358 studies reported, 15 studies were selected for our review. The mean RQS score was 7.73±4.61 (21.5% of the ideal score of 36). The overall TRIPOD adherence rate was 64.4% (251/390). Most of the included studies (60%) were assessed as having a high risk of bias (ROB) overall. The pooled estimates of the HRs were 3.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.12-4.64, P<0.01] for DFS and 3.36 (95% CI: 1.74-6.49, P<0.01) for OS.

Conclusions

Radiomics has potential to noninvasively predict outcome in patients with LARC. However, the overall methodological quality of radiomics studies was low, and the adherence to the TRIPOD statement was moderate. Future radiomics research should put a greater focus on enhancing the methodological quality and considering the influence of higher-order features on reproducibility in radiomics.

SUBMITTER: Feng Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10722083 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Feng Yaru Y Gong Jing J Hu Tingdan T Liu Zonglin Z Sun Yiqun Y Tong Tong T

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 20231026 12

<h4>Background</h4>Radiomics has recently received considerable research attention for providing potential prognostic biomarkers for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the methodological quality and prognostic prediction value of radiomic studies for predicting survival outcomes in patients with LARC.<h4>Methods</h4>The Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched. The radiomics quality score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a Mult ...[more]

PMID: 38106286

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceStandard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer includes concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT plus A). An alternative strategy known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) involves administration of CRT plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery with the goal of delivering uninterrupted systemic therapy to eradicate micrometastases. A comparison of these 2 approaches has not been systematically reviewed previously.ObjectiveTo determine the differences in rates of pathologic complete response (PCR), disease-free and overall survival, sphincter-preserving surgery, and ileostomy between patients receiving TNT vs standard CRT plus A.Data sourcesMEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase (via OVID) were searched from inception through July 1, 2020, for the following terms: anal/anorectal neoplasms OR anal/anorectal cancer AND total neoadjuvant treatment OR total neoadjuvant therapy. Only studies in English were included.Study selectionRandomized clinical trials or prospective/retrospective cohort studies comparing outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received TNT vs CRT plus A.Data extraction and synthesisData regarding the first author, publication year, location, sample size, and rates of PCR, sphincter-preserving surgery, ileostomy, and disease-free and overall survival were extracted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines and pooled using a random-effects model.Main outcomes and measuresRates of PCR, sphincter-preserving surgery, ileostomy, and disease-free and overall survival.ResultsAfter reviewing 2165 reports, 7 unique studies including a total of 2416 unique patients, of whom 1206 received TNT, were selected. The median age for the patients receiving TNT ranged from 57 to 69 years, with 58% to 73% being male. The pooled prevalence of PCR was 29.9% (range, 17.2%-38.5%) in the TNT group and 14.9% (range, 4.2%-21.3%) in the CRT plus A group. Total neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a higher chance of achieving a PCR (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.99-2.98). No statistically significant difference in the proportion of sphincter-preserving surgery (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.73-1.54) or ileostomy (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.76-1.46) between recipients of TNT and CRT plus A was observed. Only 3 studies presented data on disease-free survival, and pooled analysis showed significantly higher odds of improved disease-free survival in patients who received TNT (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.20-3.56; I2 = 49%). Data on overall survival were not consistently reported.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that TNT is a promising strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer, with superior rates of PCR compared with standard therapy. However, the long-term effect on disease recurrence and overall survival needs to be explored in future studies.

Dataset Information

Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets