Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related disorders. However, once-daily dosing with conventional PPIs fail to fully control acid secretion over 24 h. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) and HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE).

Methods

We enrolled 213 patients with EE randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 40 mg HIP1601 (n = 107) or HGP1705 (n = 106) once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the EE healing rate, confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. GERD-related symptoms and treatment-emergent adverse events were compared between both groups.

Results

By week 8, the estimated healing rates of EE were 97.8% and 96.8% in the HIP1601 and HGP1705 groups, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of -4.7 to 7.2. After 4 or 8 weeks of treatment, the EE healing rate at week 4, complete resolution rate of symptoms, time to sustained resolution of symptoms, and number of rescue medications used were similar in both groups. The proportion of heartburn- and acid regurgitation-free nights by week 4 were higher in the HIP1601 group compared to the HGP1705 group, but the difference did not reach clinical significance (87.7% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.514, 87.5% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.774). The number of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of HIP1601 40 mg were comparable to those of HGP1705 40 mg for the treatment of EE and symptomatic improvement of GERD.

Trial registration

NCT04080726 ( https://classic.

Clinicaltrials

gov/ct2/show/NCT04080726 ), registration date: 25/10/2018.

SUBMITTER: Lim H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10729464 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

Lim Hyun H Park Jong Kyu JK Chung Hyunsoo H Lee Si Hyung SH Park Jae Myung JM Park Jung Ho JH Kim Gwang Ha GH Shin Sung Kwan SK Hong Su Jin SJ Lee Kwang Jae KJ Park Moo In MI Jung Hye-Kyung HK Kim Hyun-Soo HS Sung Jae Kyu JK Jeon Seong Woo SW Choi Suck Chei SC Moon Jeong Seop JS Kim Nayoung N Park Jong-Jae JJ Hong Sung Hee SH Kim Na Young NY Jung Hwoon-Yong HY

BMC gastroenterology 20231218 1

<h4>Background</h4>Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related disorders. However, once-daily dosing with conventional PPIs fail to fully control acid secretion over 24 h. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) and HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE).<h4>Methods</h4>We enrolled 213 patients with EE randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 40 mg HIP1601 (n ...[more]

PMID: 38110901

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEsomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is widely used to treat acid-related disorders, but it has short plasma half-life which can cause insufficient gastric acid suppression, such as nocturnal acid breakthrough. A new dual delayed-release (DR) formulation of esomeprazole (Esomezol DR), was developed to extend the duration of gastric acid suppression.PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of esomeprazole for the DR formulation compared to a conventional enteric-coated (EC) formulation (Nexium) in healthy male subjects.MethodsTwo randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-way crossover studies with esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg were conducted. Subjects received the DR formulation or the EC formulation once daily for 7 days in each period with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the 1st dose, and 24-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored before the 1st dose as baseline and after the 1st and the 7th dose.ResultsIn 20 mg and 40 mg dose groups, 38 and 44 subjects completed the study, respectively. The DR formulation exhibited the dual-release pattern of esomeprazole, resulting in more sustained plasma concentration-time profiles compared to the EC formulation. The systemic exposure of esomeprazole for the DR formulation was comparable to that for the EC formulation, showing the similar area under the plasma concentration-time curve. The 24-hour gastric acid suppression was also similar between the two formulations, while the inhibition during night-time (22:00-06:00) showed a better tendency in the DR formulation.ConclusionThe sustained exposure of esomeprazole in the DR formulation led to well-maintained and higher acid inhibition compared to the EC formulation, especially during the night-time. These results suggest that the DR formulation can be an alternative formulation to the conventional EC formulation, expecting the potential of relieving nocturnal acid-related symptoms.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials

Publications

Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets