Dataset Information

A snare maneuver to reposition self-expandable aortic valve after transcatheter replacement of surgically implanted valve.

ABSTRACT: In this case, we successfully repositioned the transcatheter heart valve (THV) by pulling it with a snare inserted via the right brachial artery. Attempting to pull the THV via the femoral approach was not successful, due to the vector of the pulling force not being coaxial. Changing the direction of the force by switching to an approach from the right brachial artery successfully prevented perivalvular leakage. While there are previous case reports of repositioning an implanted transcatheter valve in a native valve using a gooseneck snare, to our knowledge, this is the first case of successfully repositioning an implanted transcatheter valve in a valve-in-valve procedure using the precise assessment that can be achieved with intra-procedural transesophageal echocardiography.

Learning objective

Perivalvular leakage (PVL) is a major problem after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. In this case, we experienced PVL after implantation of self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) inside the previously inserted Mosaic bioprosthetic valve. Depth of the implanted valve was too low into left ventricle accessed with transesophageal echocardiogram. It is barely known whether THV in surgical implanted aortic valve could be repositioned using snare maneuver, but we successfully pulled the valve via brachial artery and PVL was controlled.

SUBMITTER: Takahashi K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10730269 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A snare maneuver to reposition self-expandable aortic valve after transcatheter replacement of surgically implanted valve.

Takahashi Kotaro K Tada Tomohisa T Shimamura Kiyotaka K Oosugi Masashi M Hawke Philip P Takeuchi Yasuyo Y Tsuneyoshi Hiroshi H Sakamoto Hiroki H

Journal of cardiology cases 20230901 6

In this case, we successfully repositioned the transcatheter heart valve (THV) by pulling it with a snare inserted via the right brachial artery. Attempting to pull the THV via the femoral approach was not successful, due to the vector of the pulling force not being coaxial. Changing the direction of the force by switching to an approach from the right brachial artery successfully prevented perivalvular leakage. While there are previous case reports of repositioning an implanted transcatheter va ...[more]

PMID: 38126048

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aims: The study aimed to compare paravalvular leak (PVL) changes after a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expandable prosthesis between different aortic valve morphologies and evaluate the impact of paravalvular leak regression on clinical prognosis. Methods: Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) successfully treated with a self-expandable TAVR who were followed up for at least 1 year at our centre were consecutively enrolled from January 2016 to August 2019. Paired serial changes in paravalvular leak and other haemodynamic parameters by echocardiography were collected and compared between the bicuspid valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). A logistic regression model was used to explore the predictors of paravalvular leak regression (<1 grade) 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, while its impact on subsequent clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation for heart failure (HF)) was further evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 153 bicuspid valve and 114 tricuspid aortic valve patients were finally enrolled; haemodynamic parameters and paravalvular leak severity were comparable before the discharge between the two groups. The peak transaortic velocity, mean transvalvular gradient, and effective orifice area all significantly improved (p < 0.05) without intergroup differences at all follow-up timepoints. Significant paravalvular leak reduction was observed only in the TAV group (1.75% vs. 4.39%, p = 0.029), while moderate paravalular leak was still more prevalent in BAV (7.19% vs. 1.75%, p = 0.041) at the 1-year follow-up. Multivariable analyses identified the bicuspid valve, asymmetric calcification, and undersizing as independent predictors of failure of the 1-year paravalvular leak reduction in patients with mild or moderate paravalvular leak after discharge. Patients without a paravalvular leak reduction within 1 year showed a relatively higher 2-year all-cause mortality and HF (HR: 5.994, 95% CI: 1.691-21.240, and p = 0.053) rates thereafter. Conclusion: In AS patients after self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement, paravalvular leak regression within 1 year was less prevalent in bicuspid valve morphology. The failure of paravalvular leak reduction might lead to an increased risk of poorer prognosis in the long run.

Project description:BackgroundCoronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a rare, yet life-threatening, complication. The routine use of left main (LM) protection with or without stent placement in high-risk patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of LM protection during TAVR and identify anatomic factors associated with need for stent placement.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all TAVR cases (native and valve-in-valve) performed in our institution between 2014 and 2019 and identified patients who underwent LM protection with a coronary wire, balloon, and/or stent during the procedure. We compared the pre-TAVR computed tomography aortic root characteristics, procedural data, short-, and long-term outcomes among the patients who eventually received an LM stent and those who did not.ResultsAmong 1925 TAVR patients, 41 (2.1%) underwent LM protection, and 10 of them (25%) had eventually a stent placed in the LM for threatened obstruction after valve deployment. In the native TAVR group (n = 35), 8 patients underwent LM stenting. A larger TAVR prosthesis, larger annular circumference (83.8 vs 76.1 mm; P = .038), lower ratio of sinotubular junction diameter to prosthesis size (1.02 vs 1.11; P = .032), and longer left coronary cusp (15.1 vs 13.9 mm; P = .18) were associated with higher incidence of LM stenting. In the valve-in-valve TAVR group (n = 6), 5 patients had a valve-to-coronary distance of less than 4 mm, and 2 of them received an LM stent. Both stent and nonstent groups had excellent outcomes with no major adverse cardiovascular events or coronary obstruction at 30 days. After a median follow-up of 351 days, 4 patients died (9.7%) (1 in the stent and 3 in the nonstent group), without any cases of late coronary obstruction or percutaneous coronary intervention in either group.ConclusionsLM protection with a coronary guidewire, balloon, or stent is a safe and effective method of coronary protection during TAVR in appropriately selected high-risk patients. Annular circumference, prosthesis size, left coronary cusp length, LM ostial height, and ratio of sinotubular junction to prosthesis size are important predictors of stent deployment.

Dataset Information

A snare maneuver to reposition self-expandable aortic valve after transcatheter replacement of surgically implanted valve.

Learning objective

Publications

A snare maneuver to reposition self-expandable aortic valve after transcatheter replacement of surgically implanted valve.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets