Epithelial ovarian cancer survival by race and ethnicity in an equal-access healthcare population.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Previous studies in the general population observed that compared with non-Hispanic White women, Pacific Islander and Black women have higher age-adjusted mortality rates from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), while Asian American patients have lower mortality. We investigated whether race and ethnicity is associated with differences in EOC survival in a United States Military population where patients have equal access to healthcare.Methods
This retrospective study included women diagnosed with EOC between 2001 and 2018 among Department of Defense beneficiaries. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, histology and stage.Results
In our study population of 1230 invasive EOC cases (558 non-Hispanic White, 74 non-Hispanic Black, 73 Asian, 30 Pacific Islander and 36 Hispanic cases), 63% of the women died (all-cause death) after a mean = 4.8 years (SD = 4.1) of follow-up following diagnosis. Compared with non-Hispanic White cases, Asian cases had better overall survival, HR = 0.76 (95% CI = 0.58-0.98), whereas there were no differences in survival for other racial and ethnic groups.Conclusions
These findings highlight the need to investigate how differences in access to healthcare may influence observed racial and ethnic disparities for EOC.
SUBMITTER: Arter ZL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10781944 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Epithelial ovarian cancer survival by race and ethnicity in an equal-access healthcare population.
Arter Zhaohui L ZL Desmond Daniel D Berenberg Jeffrey L JL Killeen Jeffrey L JL Bunch Kristen K Merritt Melissa A MA
British journal of cancer 20231206 1
<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies in the general population observed that compared with non-Hispanic White women, Pacific Islander and Black women have higher age-adjusted mortality rates from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), while Asian American patients have lower mortality. We investigated whether race and ethnicity is associated with differences in EOC survival in a United States Military population where patients have equal access to healthcare.<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective study inc ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:PurposeThere are racial and ethnic differences in endometrial cancer incidence and mortality rates; compared with Non-Hispanic White women, Black women have a similar incidence rate for endometrial cancer, but their mortality is higher. Pacific Islander women may also have worse outcomes compared to their White counterparts. We assessed tumor characteristics and adjuvant therapy by racial and ethnic group among endometrial cancer patients treated within the Military Health System, an equal access healthcare organization.MethodsWe retrospectively identified women diagnosed with invasive endometrial cancer among US Department of Defense beneficiaries reported in the Automated Central Tumor Registry database (year of diagnosis: 2001-2018). We compared tumor characteristics and receipt of adjuvant therapy across racial and ethnic groups using Chi-square or Fisher tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of all cause mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age at diagnosis, adjuvant therapy, histology and stage.ResultsThe study included 2574 endometrial cancer patients [1729 Non-Hispanic White, 318 Asian, 286 Black, 140 Pacific Islander and 101 Hispanic women]. Among all cases, a higher proportion of Black patients had non-endometrioid histology (46.5% versus ≤ 29.3% in other groups, P < 0.01) and grade 3-4 tumors (40.1% versus ≤ 29.3% in other groups, P < 0.01). In multivariable Cox models, compared with Non-Hispanic White cases, Black endometrial cancer patients had a higher mortality risk (HR 1.43, 95% CI, 1.13-1.83). There was no difference in mortality risk for other racial and ethnic groups.ConclusionBlack patients with endometrial cancer presented with more aggressive tumor features and they had worse overall survival compared with patients in other racial and ethnic groups. Further study is needed to better direct preventive and therapeutic efforts in order to correct endometrial cancer disparities in the future.
| S-EPMC10533614 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionDifferences in breast cancer survival by race and ethnicity are often assumed to be a fairly recent phenomenon, and are hypothesized to have arisen due to gaps in receipt of screening or therapy. The emergence of these differences in calendar time have implications for identification of their origin. We sought to determine whether breast cancer survival differences by race or ethnicity arose in tandem with the advent of screening or therapeutic advances.Materials and methodsA cohort of women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1975-2009 in 18 population-based registries were followed for five-year breast cancer cause-specific survival. Differences in survival according to race/ethnicity and estrogen receptor status were quantified in Cox proportional hazards models, with estimation of hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and absolute risk differences. For 2010, we also assessed differences in survival by breast cancer subtypes defined by hormone receptor and Her2/neu status.ResultsAmong over 930,000 women, initial differences in five-year breast cancer-specific survival by race became apparent among 1975-1979 diagnoses and continued to be evident, with stronger disparities apparent in those of Black vs. White Non-Hispanic (WNH) race and among estrogen-receptor positive vs. negative disease. Within breast cancer subtype, all included race/ethnic groups experienced disparate survival in comparison with WNH women for triple-negative disease. Black women had a consistent gap in absolute survival of .10-.12, compared with WNH women, from 1975-1979 through all included time periods, such that 5- year survival of Black women diagnosed in 2005-09 lagged more than 20 years behind that of WNH women.DiscussionSurvival differed by race for diagnoses that predate the introduction of mammographic screening and most therapeutic advances. Absolute differences in survival by race and ethnicity have remained almost constant over 40 years of observation, suggesting early origins for some contributors.
| S-EPMC6812853 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceLittle is known about the distribution of life-saving trauma resources by racial/ethnic composition in US cities, and if racial/ethnic minority populations disproportionately live in US urban trauma deserts.ObjectiveTo examine racial/ethnic differences in geographic access to trauma care in the 3 largest US cities, considering the role of residential segregation and neighborhood poverty.Design, setting, and participantsA cross-sectional, multiple-methods study evaluated census tract data from the 2015 American Community Survey in Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles (LA), California; and New York City (NYC), New York (N = 3932). These data were paired to geographic coordinates of all adult level I and II trauma centers within an 8.0-km buffer of each city. Between February and September 2018, small-area analyses were conducted to assess trauma desert status as a function of neighborhood racial/ethnic composition, and geospatial analyses were conducted to examine statistically significant trauma desert hot spots.Main outcomes and measuresIn small-area analyses, a trauma desert was defined as travel distance greater than 8.0 km to the nearest adult level I or level II trauma center. In geospatial analyses, relative trauma deserts were identified using travel distance as a continuous measure. Census tracts were classified into (1) racial/ethnic composition categories, based on patterns of residential segregation, including white majority, black majority, Hispanic/Latino majority, and other or integrated; and (2) poverty categories, including nonpoor and poor.ResultsChicago, LA, and NYC contained 798, 1006, and 2128 census tracts, respectively. A large proportion comprised a black majority population in Chicago (35.1%) and NYC (21.4%), compared with LA (2.7%). In primary analyses, black majority census tracts were more likely than white majority census tracts to be located in a trauma desert in Chicago (odds ratio [OR], 8.48; 95% CI, 5.71-12.59) and LA (OR, 5.11; 95% CI, 1.50-17.39). In NYC, racial/ethnic disparities were not significant in unadjusted models, but were significant in models adjusting for poverty and race-poverty interaction effects (adjusted OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27-2.74). In comparison, Hispanic/Latino majority census tracts were less likely to be located in a trauma desert in NYC (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.11) and LA (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.40), but slightly more likely in Chicago (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.56-3.64).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, black majority census tracts were the only racial/ethnic group that appeared to be associated with disparities in geographic access to trauma centers.
| S-EPMC6484639 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceInternational guidelines use cancer antigen (CA) 125 thresholds to recommend which patients with pelvic masses should undergo evaluation by gynecologic oncologists for ovarian cancer. However, CA-125 thresholds were developed from White populations. If CA-125 levels differ among patient populations, current guidelines may contribute to delayed ovarian cancer diagnoses among women of other races and ethnicities than White.ObjectiveTo examine CA-125 levels at ovarian cancer diagnosis by patient race and ethnicity and associations of elevated CA-125 levels with timely treatment.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included all patients with ovarian cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, using the US National Cancer Database. The data analysis was performed between November 1, 2023, and July 10, 2024.ExposurePatient race and ethnicity as identified in the National Cancer Database.Main outcome and measuresCancer antigen 125 level was defined as elevated or borderline and negative or normal. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of patient race and ethnicity with CA-125 level overall and for epithelial and high-grade serous cancers. Generalized linear models were used to examine the association of CA-125 level with days from diagnosis to chemotherapy start for patients with stage II to IV ovarian cancer.ResultsOf the 250 749 patients with ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2020 (median [IQR] age, 62.0 [52.0-73.0] years; 0.4% American Indian, 3.7% Asian, 8.6% Black, 85.2% White, and 2.0% other or unknown race and 6.7% Hispanic, 88.8% non-Hispanic, and 4.6% of unknown ethnicity), 212 477 had measured CA-125 levels, and 88.2% had an elevated CA-125 level at diagnosis. Patients with American Indian, Asian, or Black race were less likely to have an elevated CA-125 level at ovarian cancer diagnosis than White patients. In multivariable analyses adjusted for stage, comorbidities, and menopausal status, Black patients had lower odds of elevated CA-125 levels (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81) compared with White patients, as did American Indian patients (AOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). Among patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer only, Black patients had a lower odds of having an elevated CA-125 level at diagnosis (AOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91). Patients with stage II to IV ovarian cancer with false-negative CA-125 findings at diagnosis had 9.38 days longer (95% CI, 8.43-10.34 days) to chemotherapy start compared with patients with an elevated CA-125 level.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of patients with ovarian cancer, American Indian and Black patients were 23% less likely to have an elevated CA-125 level at diagnosis. Current CA-125 thresholds may miss racially and ethnically diverse patients with ovarian cancer. Work is needed to develop inclusive CA-125 thresholds and diagnostic guidelines and not compound disparities in ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment.
| S-EPMC11926651 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceProstate cancer (PCa) remains a leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the US.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of healthy lifestyle and dietary behaviors with survival after a nonmetastatic PCa diagnosis in a multiethnic population.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective cohort study was conducted among men aged 45 to 75 years enrolled between 1993 and 1996 in the Multiethnic Cohort study. Participants with nonmetastatic PCa completed a questionnaire after diagnosis (2003-2008) and were followed up until death or loss to follow-up. Data were analyzed from January 10, 2023, to May 20, 2024.ExposuresLifestyle and dietary patterns were assessed after diagnosis using 3 PCa behavior scores and 13 dietary indices (4 prioritized scores: the Healthy Eating Index-2015, Healthful Plant-Based Diet Index, Dietary Inflammatory Index, and Empirical Dietary Index for Hyperinsulinemia).Main outcomes and measuresCox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate multivariable-adjusted associations of each PCa behavior score with all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and PCa-specific mortality.ResultsA total of 2603 men with nonmetastatic PCa (mean [SD] age, 69.6 [7.1] years) were followed up, and 1346 deaths were documented, including 356 (24.6%) from CVD and 197 (14.6%) from PCa. The median (IQR) follow-up was 10.9 (IQR, 6.8-12.7) years from questionnaire return and 14.5 (IQR, 11.8-18.0) years from diagnosis. The 2021 PCa Behavior Score was associated with reduced risks of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] per point, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77) and CVD-related (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79) mortality. This score was also associated with a lower risk of PCa-specific mortality among African American men (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.88) but not in the other racial and ethnic groups. Comparing quintile 5 (highest score) with 1 (lowest score), the Empirical Dietary Index for Hyperinsulinemia was positively associated with all-cause (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02-1.84) and CVD-related (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.15-3.33) mortality, whereas the Healthful Plant-Based Diet Index was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.97); findings for CVD-related mortality were not statistically significant (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.03). No associations were found between lifestyle or dietary patterns and PCa mortality.Conclusions and relevanceIn this multiethnic cohort of patients with nonmetastatic PCa, healthier lifestyles were associated with improved overall survival but not with PCa-specific survival. Given the predominance of non-PCa-specific deaths, these findings support the need for health behavior counseling to treat comorbidities in men with PCa.
| S-EPMC11866029 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundScreening outreach programs using population health management principles offer services uniformly to all eligible persons, but racial/ethnic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening patterns in such programs are not well known.ObjectiveTo examine the association between race/ethnicity and the receipt of CRC screening and timely follow-up of positive results before and after implementation of a screening program.DesignRetrospective cohort study of screen-eligible individuals at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California community-based integrated healthcare delivery system (2004-2013).SubjectsA total of 868,934 screen-eligible individuals 51-74 years of age at cohort entry, which included 662,872 persons in the period before program implementation (2004-2006), 654,633 during the first 3 years after implementation (2007-2009), and 665,268 in the period from 4 to 7 years (2010-2013) after program implementation.InterventionA comprehensive system-wide long-term effort to increase CRC that included leadership alignment, goal-setting, and quality assurance through a PHM approach, using mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) along with offering screening at office visits.Main measuresDifferences over time and by race/ethnicity in up-to-date CRC screening (overall and by test type) and timely follow-up of a positive screen. Race/ethnicity categories included non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American, and multiple races.Key resultsFrom 2004 to 2013, age/sex-adjusted CRC screening rates increased in all groups, including 35.2 to 81.1 % among whites and 35.6 to 78.0 % among blacks. Screening rates among Hispanics (33.1 to 78.3 %) and Native Americans (29.4 to 74.5 %) remained lower than those for whites both before and after program implementation. Blacks, who had slightly higher rates before program implementation (adjusted rate ratio [RR] = 1.04, 99 % CI: 1.02-1.05), had lower rates after program implementation (RR for period from 4 to 7 years = 0.97, 99 % CI: 0.96-0.97). There were also substantial improvements in timely follow-up of positive screening results.ConclusionsIn this screening program using core PHM principles, CRC screening increased markedly in all racial/ethnic groups, but disparities persisted for some groups and developed in others, which correlated with levels of adoption of mailed FIT.
| S-EPMC5071288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe mortality rate for Black women with endometrial cancer (EC) is double that of White women, although the incidence rate is lower among Black women. Unequal access to care may contribute to this racial disparity. This study aimed to assess whether survival varied between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with EC in the Military Health System (MHS) which provides equal access care to its beneficiaries despite racial/ethnic background.MethodsThe study was conducted using data from the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD) Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR). Study subjects included NHB and NHW women with histologically confirmed and surgically managed EC diagnosed between 1988 and 2013. The study outcome was all-cause death. Overall survival between NHB and NHW women was compared using multivariable Cox modeling.ResultsThe study included 144 NHB and 1439 NHW women with EC. Kaplan-Meier curves showed NHB women had worse survival than NHW women (log-rank P < 0.0001). The disparity in survival between NHB and NHW women persisted after adjusting for age, diagnosis period, tumor stage, tumor histology/grade, and adjuvant treatment (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.27). Multivariable analyses stratified by tumor features or treatment showed that the racial disparity was confined to women with low-risk features (stage I/II disease or low-grade EC) or no adjuvant treatment.ConclusionThere were racial differences in overall survival between NHB and NHW women with EC in the MHS equal access healthcare system, suggesting that factors other than access to care may be related to this racial disparity.
| S-EPMC8562590 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceAdvanced-stage breast cancer rates vary by race and ethnicity, with Black women having a 2-fold higher rate than White women among regular screeners. Clinical risk factors that explain a large proportion of advanced breast cancers by race and ethnicity are unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the population attributable risk proportions (PARPs) for advanced-stage breast cancer (prognostic pathologic stage IIA or higher) associated with clinical risk factors among routinely screened premenopausal and postmenopausal women by race and ethnicity.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study used data collected prospectively from Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium community-based breast imaging facilities from January 2005 to June 2018. Participants were women aged 40 to 74 years undergoing 3 331 740 annual (prior screening within 11-18 months) or biennial (prior screening within 19-30 months) screening mammograms associated with 1815 advanced breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of screening examinations. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to August 2023.ExposuresHeterogeneously or extremely dense breasts, first-degree family history of breast cancer, overweight/obesity (body mass index >25.0), history of benign breast biopsy, and screening interval (biennial vs annual) stratified by menopausal status and race and ethnicity (Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, White, other/multiracial).Main outcomes and measuresPARPs for advanced breast cancer.ResultsAmong 904 615 women, median (IQR) age was 57 (50-64) years. Of the 3 331 740 annual or biennial screening mammograms, 10.8% were for Asian or Pacific Islander women; 9.5% were for Black women; 5.3% were for Hispanic/Latinx women; 72.0% were for White women; and 2.0% were for women of other races and ethnicities, including those who were Alaska Native, American Indian, 2 or more reported races, or other. Body mass index PARPs were larger for postmenopausal vs premenopausal women (30% vs 22%) and highest for postmenopausal Black (38.6%; 95% CI, 32.0%-44.8%) and Hispanic/Latinx women (31.8%; 95% CI, 25.3%-38.0%) and premenopausal Black women (30.3%; 95% CI, 17.7%-42.0%), with overall prevalence of having overweight/obesity highest in premenopausal Black (84.4%) and postmenopausal Black (85.1%) and Hispanic/Latinx women (72.4%). Breast density PARPs were larger for premenopausal vs postmenopausal women (37% vs 24%, respectively) and highest among premenopausal Asian or Pacific Islander (46.6%; 95% CI, 37.9%-54.4%) and White women (39.8%; 95% CI, 31.7%-47.3%) whose prevalence of dense breasts was high (62%-79%). For premenopausal and postmenopausal women, PARPs were small for family history of breast cancer (5%-8%), history of breast biopsy (7%-12%), and screening interval (2.1%-2.3%).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study among routinely screened women, the proportion of advanced breast cancers attributed to biennial vs annual screening was small. To reduce the number of advanced breast cancer diagnoses, primary prevention should focus on interventions that shift patients with overweight and obesity to normal weight.
| S-EPMC10704341 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9996638 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cervical cancer outcomes remain poor among disadvantaged populations, including ethnic minorities, low-income, and underinsured women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms that underlie the observed association between race/ethnicity and cervical cancer survival. We identified 13,698 women, ages 21 to 64 years, diagnosed with stages I-III primary cervical cancer between 2007-2013 in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated associations between race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Other) and cervical cancer-specific mortality. We conducted mediation analysis to calculate the mediation proportion and its 95% confidence interval. Non-Hispanic black women had an increased risk of cervical cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08-1.39), and Hispanic women a decreased risk of dying from their disease (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93), compared with non-Hispanic white. The estimated proportion of excess cervical cancer mortality for non-Hispanic black women relative to non-Hispanic white women that was mediated by insurance was 18.6% and by treatment was 47.2%. Furthermore, non-Hispanic black women were more likely to receive radiation and less likely to receive surgery for early-stage disease. In this population-based study we found that some of the excess cervical cancer-specific mortality for non-Hispanic black women is mediated by factors such as insurance status and treatment. These findings suggest that enhancing existing insurance coverage and ensuring equal and adequate treatment in all women may be a key strategy for improving cervical cancer outcomes.
| S-EPMC5814056 | biostudies-literature