Dataset Information

Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.

Objective

To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.

Methods

The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient's weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.

Results

Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, P < .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10-0.39], P < .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07-0.59], P = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score >80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT >300 seconds and final infusion rate.

Conclusion

A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.

SUBMITTER: Kalscheur MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10787148 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Kalscheur Matthew M MM Martini Matthew R MR Mahnke Marcus M Osman Fauzia F Modaff Daniel S DS Fleeman Blake E BE Kipp Ryan T RT Wright Jennifer M JM Medow Joshua E JE

Cardiovascular digital health journal 20231114 6

<h4>Background</h4>Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagu ...[more]

PMID: 38222102

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsFew recent large-scale studies have evaluated the risks and benefits of continuing oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the status of continuation of OAC therapy and the association between continuation of OAC therapy and thromboembolic and bleeding events according to the CHADS2 score.MethodsThis retrospective study included data from the Japanese nationwide administrative claims database of patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2014 and March 2021. Patients without AF recurrence assessed by administrative data of the treatment modalities were divided into two groups according to continuation of OAC therapy 6 months after the index CA. The primary outcomes were thromboembolism and major bleeding after a landmark period of 6 months. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, the association between OAC continuation and outcomes was determined according to the CHADS2 score.ResultsAmong 231 374 patients included, 69.7%, 21.6%, and 8.7% had CHADS2 scores of ≤1, 2, and ≥3, respectively. Of these, 71% continued OAC therapy at 6 months. The OAC continuation rate was higher in the high CHADS2 score group than that in the low CHADS2 score group. Among all patients, 2451 patients (0.55 per 100 person-years) had thromboembolism and 2367 (0.53 per 100 person-years) had major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≤1 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.01, P = .06] for thromboembolism and was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.27-1.80, P < .001) for major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≥3 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82, P = .001) for thromboembolism and was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.71-1.56, P = 0.81) for major bleeding.ConclusionsThis observational study suggests that the benefits and risks of continuing OAC therapy after CA for AF differ based on the patient's CHADS2 score. The risk of major bleeding due to OAC continuation seems to outweigh the risk reduction of thromboembolism in patients with lower thromboembolic risk.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets