Debating Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma in the Modern Adjuvant Era.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhang X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10852382 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Debating Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma in the Modern Adjuvant Era.
Zhang Xiaoran X Ferris Laura L Faries Mark B MB Luke Jason J JJ
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20230706 26
Similar Datasets
Project description:Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure aimed to detect nodal metastases in patients with clinically occult disease. Since the advent of new systemic therapies, its role in melanoma has been extensively debated over the last years. In this article, three possible scenarios are discussed, considering the SLNB impact on the management of melanoma patients. First, pT1b and pT2a patients with negative SLNB (stages IA and IB) and those with positive SLNB (stage IIIA) would all not benefit from adjuvant treatment. Therefore, SLNB might be avoided in these categories of patients. Second, in IIB and IIC, melanoma patients are already candidates for adjuvant treatment; therefore, SLNB in patients with T3b, T4a, or T4b melanoma would not change treatment decisions. On the other end of the spectrum, patients with pT2b and pT3a melanomas (clinical stage IIA) represent the only two groups whose management would be significantly affected by the SLNB status, being adjuvant therapy only indicated for SLN-positive patients. Further studies are needed to investigate which melanoma patient deserves SLNB.
| S-EPMC10868905 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The incidence of malignant melanoma has increased over the past 25 years in the UK, but death rates have remained fairly constant. The 5-year survival rate ranges from 20% to 95%, depending on disease stage. Risks are greater in white populations and in people with higher numbers of skin naevi. We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What is the evidence for performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy in people with malignant melanoma with clinically uninvolved lymph nodes? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to October 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview). At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 221 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 99 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 58 studies and the further review of 41 full publications. Of the 41 full articles evaluated, one systematic review and three RCTs were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for two PICO combinations. In this systematic overview, we evaluated the evidence for performing sentinel lymph node biopsy in people with malignant melanoma with clinically uninvolved lymph nodes.
| S-EPMC4720216 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6461196 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10796163 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceRefining eligibility guidelines may identify more appropriate patients to undergo useful medical procedures.ObjectiveTo improve cost-effectiveness in selecting patients with melanoma for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).Design, setting, and participantsThis hybrid prognostic study/decision analytical model was conducted among patients with melanoma who were eligible for SLNB at 2 melanoma centers from Australia and the US from 2000 to 2014. Participants consisted of 2 cohorts of patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB and a cohort of eligible patients without SLNB. Individualized probabilities of SLNB positivity generated by a patient-centered methodology (PCM) were compared with those generated by conventional multiple logistic regression analysis investigating 12 prognostic factors. Prognostic accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each methodology and by matched-pair analyses.InterventionsTriaging appropriate patients to undergo SLNB.Main outcomes and measuresTotal number of SLNBs performed (giving total cost) vs number of SLNB-positive outcomes (a measure of effectiveness) was evaluated. Improved cost-effectiveness through judicious patient selection was interpreted as increased numbers of SLNB-positive outcomes achieved, decreased numbers of SLNBs performed, or both outcomes simultaneously.ResultsAmong 7331 patients with melanoma, SLNB outcomes were assessed in 3640 Australian patients (2212 males [60.8%]; 2447 aged >50 years [67.2%]) and 1342 US patients (774 males [57.7%]; 885 aged >50 years [66.0%]); 2349 patients eligible for SLNB who did not undergo the procedure were included in the simulation. PCM-generated probabilities achieved an AUROC of 0.803 in predicting SLNB positivity in the Australian cohort and 0.826 in the US cohort, higher than corresponding AUROCs generated by conventional logistic regression analysis. In simulation, adopting many SLNB-positive probabilities as minimally acceptable patient-selection criteria resulted in fewer procedures performed or increased the expected numbers of positive SLNBs. A minimally acceptable PCM-generated probability of 8.7% elicited the same number of SLNBs as historically performed (3640 SLNBs), with 1066 positive SLNBs (29.3%), constituting an improvement of 287 additional positive SLNBs compared with 779 actual positive SLNBs (36.8% improvement). In contrast, adopting a 23.7% PCM-generated minimum cutoff probability resulted in performing 1825 SLNBs, or 1815 fewer SLNBs than the actual experience (49.9%). It resulted in the same expected number of positive results (779 SLNBs), for a 42.7% positivity rate.Conclusions and relevanceThis prognostic study/decision analytical model found that the PCM approach outperformed conventional multiple logistic regression analysis in predicting which patients would have positive results on SLNB. These findings suggest that systematically producing and exploiting more accurate SLNB-positivity probabilities could improve the selection of patients with melanoma for SLNB compared with using established guidelines, thus improving the cost-effectiveness of the selection process. Eligibility guidelines to undergo SLNB should include a context-tailored minimum cutoff probability.
| S-EPMC10116363 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9978891 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed less often for older patients with melanoma. We investigated the association of SLNB and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in the elderly.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER: 2010-2019) for patients ≥ 70 years with cT2-4N0M0 melanoma. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of SLNB performance and SLN status on MSS at increasing age cutoffs. In addition, we evaluated the association of different factors with SLNB performance using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 11,548 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy occurred in 6754 (58.5%) patients, 1050 (15.5%) of whom had a positive SLN. On adjusted SEER analysis, a negative SLN was independently associated with improved MSS (overall hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.67) for patients up to 87 years old. Positive SLNB was independently associated with inferior MSS (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.93-1.98). Increasing age groups were significantly associated with decreased SLNB performance.ConclusionsSentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with cancer-specific survival and adds prognostic information for elderly patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performance should not be eliminated in elderly patients based on age alone, unless justified by poor performance status, patient preference, or other surgical contraindications. Decreased SLNB performance with increasing age in our cohort may indicate a missed therapeutic opportunity in the care of elderly patients with melanoma.
| S-EPMC11467064 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to report the additional prognostic information and cost associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with T1b melanoma.Patients and methodsAn institutional database was queried for patients with T1b melanoma (0.8-1.0 mm or < 0.8 mm with ulceration) with at least 5 years of follow-up. Results of SLNB, completion lymphadenectomy (CLND), recurrence, and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed. Institutional costs of melanoma care were converted to Medicare proportional dollars. A Markov model was created to estimate long-term costs.ResultsAmong the total 392 patients, 238 underwent SLNB. Median follow-up was 10.5 years. SLNB was positive in 19 patients (8.0%). Patients who underwent SLNB had higher 10-year nodal recurrence-free survival (98.6% vs. 91.2%, p < 0.001) but not MSS (94.4% vs. 93.2%, p = 0.55). Ulceration (HR 4.7, p = 0.022) and positive sentinel node (HR 11.5, p < 0.001) were associated with worse MSS. Estimates for 5-year costs reflect a fourfold increase in total costs of care associated with SLNB. However, a treatment plan that forgoes adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIIA melanoma but offers systemic therapy for a node-basin recurrence would nullify the additional cost of SLNB.ConclusionsSLNB is prognostic for T1b melanoma. Its impact on the overall cost of melanoma care is intimately tied to systemic therapy in the adjuvant and recurrent settings.
| S-EPMC8366311 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cutaneous malignant melanoma is a rare but fatal disease in East Asia. Despite its increasing incidence, a general lack of awareness about the disease was noted. This study aims to provide population-based prognostic analysis of melanoma with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in Taiwan. We conducted this retrospective cohort study using the data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 1997-2013. The study cohort contains 3284 patients. The 5-year survival rates of patients undergoing SLNB and not undergoing SLNB were 45.5% and 33.6%. In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 80 years [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 2.15] and male (aHR = 1.19) were associated with a poorer prognosis, while high social economic status (SES) (aHR = 0.69) and undergoing SLNB (aHR = 0.84) were good prognostic factors. Old age and low SES were associated with lower percentages of patients undergoing SLNB (P < 0.001). E-value analysis suggested robustness to unmeasured confounding. In conclusion, undergoing SLNB was associated with a better prognosis. The poor prognosis of old age and low SES may be due to decreased percentages of patients undergoing SLNB. Therefore, we recommend that SLNB should be performed on patients, especially in old age or low SES, who are candidates for SLNB according to current guidelines to achieve maximal survival.
| S-EPMC8521595 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo identify suitable diagnostic tools and evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for inguinal lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer.MethodsData from 41 patients with vulvar cancer were evaluated retrospectively, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements, SLN biopsy status, groin lymph node metastasis, and prognosis.ResultsSLN biopsy was conducted in 12 patients who had stage I to III disease. Groin lymphadenectomy was omitted in five of the nine patients with negative SLNs. All SLN-negative patients who did not undergo groin lymphadenectomy showed no evidence of disease after treatment. On MRI, the long and short diameters of the inguinal node were significantly longer in metastasis-positive cases, compared with negative cases, in 25 patients whose nodes were evaluated pathologically (long diameter, 12.8 mm vs. 8.8 mm, p=0.025; short diameter, 9.2 mm vs. 6.7 mm, p=0.041). The threshold of >10.0 mm for the long axis gave a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87.5%, 70.6%, 58.3%, and 92.3%, respectively, using a binary classification test. Decision tree analysis revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 87.5%, 70.6%, and 76.0%, respectively, with the threshold of >10.0 mm for the long axis on MRI. The criteria of >10.0 mm for the long axis on MRI predicted an advanced stage and poorer prognosis using a validation set of 15 cases (p=0.028).ConclusionMinimally invasive surgery after preoperative evaluation on MRI and SLN biopsy is a feasible strategy for patients with vulvar cancer.
| S-EPMC5078820 | biostudies-literature