Adventitial inversion plus prosthesis eversion suture technique in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Qin W
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10859583 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Adventitial inversion plus prosthesis eversion suture technique in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection.
Qin Wei W Fan Rui R Li Jian J Chen Xin X
JTCVS techniques 20231122
Similar Datasets
Project description:Labral tears are a significant cause of hip pain and are currently the most common indication for hip arthroscopy. Compared with labral debridement, labral repair has significantly better outcomes in terms of both daily activities and athletic pursuits in the setting of femoral acetabular impingement. The classic techniques described in the literature for labral repair all use loop or pass-through intrasubstance labral sutures to achieve a functional hip seal. This hip seal is important for hip stability and optimal joint biomechanics, as well as in the prevention of long-term osteoarthritis. We describe a novel eversion-inversion intrasubstance suturing technique for labral repair and reconstruction that can assist in restoration of the native labrum position by re-creating an optimal seal around the femoral head.
| S-EPMC4738198 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRetrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD) is a rare but life-threatening complication after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). A graft inversion technique was applied to distal anastomosis in total arch replacement for this complicated dissection. We reviewed our results of the processing for this serious complication. The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of this technology.MethodsFrom January 2013 to December 2017, 20 patients (80% male, mean age 50.9 ± 9.5 years) with retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection were scheduled for surgical treatment at our center. All patients underwent an ascending aorta and total aortic arch replacement procedure. The 20 patients were divided into two groups, 1 group involved 9 patients underwent surgery using stepwise technique; the graft inversion technique was performed in the other group containing the remaining 11 patients. The postoperative variables, including cardiopulmonary bypass time, the circulatory arrest time, the aortic cross clamp time, were analyzed. Meanwhile we also analyzed the postoperative mortality and complications to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of surgical treatment for RTAD after TEVAR.ResultsIn-hospital mortality was 10% (2 of 20 patients). No patient developed postoperative paraplegia, renal failure, stroke, or distal anastomotic bleeding. Two patients developed renal insufficiency, one developed neurologic insufficiency, and one developed pulmonary infection, all of which were managed accordingly. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, and circulatory arrest time were significantly shorter in the graft inversion group than in the stepwise group (165.8 ± 37.9 min versus 206.1 ± 46.8 min, p<0.05; 34.5 ± 5.6 min versus 42.4 ± 9.5 min, p<0.05, respectively). The 18 survivors had a mean follow-up of 25.8 ± 18.2 months, and all patients remained alive and well.ConclusionGraft inversion can enable a secure distal anastomosis under good surgical exposure, resulting in reduced durations of CPB, and circulatory arrest for RTAD after TEVAR. Surgical treatment could be a safe alternative for treatment of this patients.
| S-EPMC6360802 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe advantages of prosthesis eversion method in patients diagnosed with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) undergoing ascending aorta replacement (AAR) is unknown. This research is designed to explore it.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of a total of 283 patients diagnosed with type A aortic dissection that underwent surgery in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from March, 2006 to April, 2020. Eighty-eight patients underwent surgical repair with traditional continuous suture technique, and 195 patients received prosthesis eversion. Baseline data, intra-operative data and early-stage clinical results were collected and statistically analyzed.ResultsBaseline data were similar except for age, incidence of hyperlipidemia and taking ACEI/ARB drugs (P<0.05). Cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross-clamp time, circulation arrest time, hemostasis time and total operation time in the traditional method group were far longer than in the prothesis eversion group (P<0.01). The operative mortality was similar (P>0.01). Post-operatively, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean ventilation time, mortality, incidence of re-exploration, tracheostomy, paraplegia, long-term coma and stroke between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in the traditional method group had a longer duration stay in ICU and hospital than patients in the prosthesis eversion group (P<0.05). Patients in the traditional method group received more red blood cells (RBC) (P<0.01), plasma (P<0.05), fibrinogen (P<0.01) and albumin (P<0.05) transfusions, and CoSeal™ surgical sealant (P<0.05) than patients in the prosthesis eversion group.ConclusionsOur experience and statistical analysis showed prosthesis eversion method to have some advantage in reducing blood loss and improving clinical results compared with repair with continuous suture. This technique is both simple to learn and perform.
| S-EPMC7947529 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOne of the crucial aspects of ascending aorta replacement is to achieve hemostasis of the proximal anastomosis. This study aimed to describe a modified prosthesis eversion technique for proximal anastomosis in ascending aorta replacement and compare its operative outcomes with the conventional prosthesis eversion technique.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who had ascending aortic aneurysm and underwent ascending aorta replacement with the modified or conventional prosthesis eversion technique between January 2019 and December 2022 in our center.ResultsA total of 108 patients were included: 55 in the modified group and 53 in the conventional group. The durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping and total operation in the conventional group were longer than those in the modified group. Furthermore, perioperative blood loss and the incidence of re-exploration for bleeding were significantly lower in the modified group. Accordingly, patients in the conventional group accepted more blood transfusion. The modified group had a shorter duration in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and lower total hospitalization costs than those in the conventional group.ConclusionsThe modified prosthesis eversion technique is an effective alternative for proximal anastomosis in ascending aorta replacement, with less blood loss, shorter operation time, and lower rate of postoperative complications compared with the conventional technique.
| S-EPMC10586958 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although the surgical technique for acute type A aortic dissection dramatically improved in recent years, the postoperative mortality and morbidity rates remain high. After the emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, a small tear in the aorta may result in dilation of the false lumen in the future. Some tears originate from the suture line on the anastomosis. This report introduces the novel "plaster technique" that involves using a single interrupted suture with felt and plastering a minimum dose of BioGlue into the suture hole. Similar to patients with acute aortic dissection, we found that the plaster technique using a felt pledget and minimum dose of BioGlue is effective for fragile aortic walls. Moreover, it is a simple, safe, and durable technique to strengthen the suture line.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-022-01351-0.
| S-EPMC9023616 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The management of patients with aortic dissection is challenging and its treatment is an area of development and innovation. Conventional surgical techniques are associated with significant risks in terms of mortality and morbidity in such high-risk patients. As a result of cumulative advances in technology, classical surgical techniques have been improved and enhanced by the newer endovascular approaches, leading to novel surgical hybrid procedures. Impressive early results have been seen with frozen elephant techniques, revascularisation of the supra-aortic branches and branched/fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair-alone procedures. This review describes the techniques involved in the latest hybrid procedures for aortic dissection and their outcomes.
| S-EPMC5808688 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDue to structural valve deterioration of sutureless aortic prosthesis, there is a need for explantation of the prothesis. We introduce a surgical technique to explant sutureless aortic prosthesis, which has a self-expanding stent incorporated into the aortic wall.Case presentationAn 82-year-old man who had undergone sutureless aortic valve replacement 6 years previously underwent redo-aortic and mitral valve replacement because of severe prosthetic aortic valve stenosis and mitral regurgitation. The sutureless prosthesis was explanted using 'lasso technique'. The patient was discharged after 7 days without complications.ConclusionsWe presented a useful technique to explant a sutureless aortic prosthesis.
| S-EPMC9903434 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recently, the use of surgically implanted aortic bioprostheses has been favoured in younger patients. We aimed to analyse the long-term survival and postoperative MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Event) rates in patients after isolated aortic valve replacement. We conducted a single-centre observational retrospective study, including all consecutive patients with isolated aortic valve replacement. 1:1 propensity score matching of the preoperative baseline characteristics was performed. A total of 2172 patients were enrolled in the study. After propensity score matching the study included 428 patients: 214 biological vs. 214 mechanical prostheses, divided into two subgroups: group A < 60 years and group B > 60 years. The mean follow-up time was 7.6 ± 3.9 years. Estimated survival was 97 ± 1.9% and 89 ± 3.4% at 10 years for biological and mechanical prosthesis, respectively in group A (p = 0.06). In group B the survival at 10 years was 79.1 ± 5.8% and 69.8 ± 4.4% for biological and mechanical prosthesis, respectively (p = 0.83). In group A, patients with a bioprosthesis exhibited a tendency for higher cumulative incidence MACCE rates compared to patients with a mechanical prosthesis, p = 0.83 (bio 7.3 ± 5.3% vs. mech 4.6 ± 2.2% at 10 years). In group B, patients with a mechanical prosthesis showed a tendency for higher cumulative incidence MACCE rates compared to patients with bioprosthesis, p = 0.86 (bio 4.3 ± 3.1% vs. mech 9.1 ± 3.1% at 10 years). Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement is similar in patients with a biological and mechanical prosthesis, independent of the patients' age. Moreover, younger patients (<60 years) with bioprosthesis showed a survival benefit, compared to patients with mechanical prosthesis in this age group.
| S-EPMC8658378 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most common ligamentous knee injury and often is encountered in those participating in multidirectional sports. ACL reconstruction is the most commonly performed knee ligament reconstruction and employs a variety of surgical techniques but still is challenged by residual laxity and graft rupture. To help address and prevent future ACL failures, new repair and reconstruction techniques have been employed that incorporate suture augmentation (InternalBrace; Arthrex, Naples, FL), which protects the graft during healing and ligamentization. Our goal of this article is to provide a surgical technique of suture augmentation with ACL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC6928457 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Osteochondral and pure chondral lesions of the knee are common after patellar dislocations. There are multiple described techniques for the fixation of these lesions, including metallic screws, bioabsorbable screws, bioabsorbable implants, and suture devices. The purpose of this article is to describe a surgical technique for surgical fixation of a lateral condyle chondral lesion using knotless all-suture anchors, with second-look knee arthroscopy illustrating healing of the cartilage repair.
| S-EPMC10390841 | biostudies-literature