Risk factors of recurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solitary localized renal cell carcinoma
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Chung J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10891047 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose:In this study, we described our initial experience and analyze the learning curve of segmental renal artery branch clamping with hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) using special instruments. Materials and Methods:We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive cases of hand-assisted laparoscopic PN (LPN) between May 2015 and April 2018. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative details, postoperative complications, and warm ischemic time for segmental artery branch clamping were included in our analysis. We used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to generate learning curves. Results:Segmental renal artery branch clamping was successfully completed in 16 of 20 patients. The median tumor size was 2.9 cm (range, 1.7-7.0 cm), median operation time was 185 minutes (range, 140-245 minutes), median blood loss was 291 mL (range, 100-600 mL), and median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4-7 days). The median selective ischemic time was 21 minutes (range, 16-35 minutes). No patient had postoperative complications, acute or delayed bleeding. The median pre- and postoperative serum creatinine levels (0.91 and 0.98 mg/dL, respectively), and the pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (89.7 and 79.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) were similar. Upon visual assessment of the CUSUM plots, a downward inflection point for decreasing total operation time was observed in the 9th case and estimated blood loss in the 12th case. Conclusions:Our study shows that segmental renal artery branch clamping hand-assisted LPN for localized renal tumors is feasible, safe, and has a relatively short learning curve.
| S-EPMC6397929 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo compare the long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) > 4 cm.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent LPN or LRN in our department from January 2012 to December 2017. Of the 151 patients who met the study selection criteria, 54 received LPN, and 97 received LRN. After propensity-score matching, 51 matched pairs were further analyzed. Data on patients' surgical data, complications, histologic data, renal function, and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed.ResultsCompared with the LRN group, the LPN group had a longer operative time (135 min vs. 102.5 min, p = 0.001), larger intraoperative bleeding (150 ml vs. 50 ml, p < 0.001), and required longer stays in hospital (8 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001); however, the level of ECT-GFR was superior at 3, 6, and 12 months (all p < 0.001). Similarly, a greater number of LRN patients developed CKD compared with LPN until postoperative 12 months (58.8% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). In patients with preoperative CKD, LPN may delay the progression of the CKD stage and even improve it when compared to LRN treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups for OS, CSS, MFS, and PFS (p = 0.06, p = 0.30, p = 0.90, p = 0.31, respectively). The surgical method may not be a risk factor for long-term survival prognosis.ConclusionLPN preserves renal function better than LRN and has the potential value of significantly reducing the risk of postoperative CKD, but the long-term survival prognosis of patients is comparable.
| S-EPMC10725398 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors with the reported outcomes of conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and investigate the transition of renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial across 17 academic centers in Japan. Patients with endophytic renal tumors classified as cT1, cN0, cM0 were included and underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. We defined two primary outcomes to assess functional and oncological aspects of the procedure, which were represented by the warm ischemic time and positive surgical margin, respectively. Comparisons were made using control values previously reported in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy studies. In the historical control group, the warm ischemia time was 25.2, and the positive surgical margin was 13%.ResultsOur per-protocol analysis included 98 participants. The mean warm ischemic time was 20.3 min (99% confidence interval 18.3-22.3; p < 0.0001 vs. 25.2). None of the 98 participants had a positive surgical margin (99% confidence interval 0-5.3%; p < 0.0001 vs. 13.0%). The renal function ratio of eGFR before and after protocol treatment multiplied by splits was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.75). Factors such as preoperative eGFR, resected weight, and warm ischemic time influenced the functional loss of the partially nephrectomized kidney after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.ConclusionsRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors offers a shorter warm ischemia time and comparable positive surgical margin rate compared with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
| S-EPMC11420261 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction: For patients with clinically localized renal masses, positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) have been associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence, although some studies have challenged this conclusion. Owing to inconsistent reports and a lack of long-term robotic data, the clinical impact of PSM after RPN remains uncertain. We evaluate long-term (>6 years) survival outcomes after RPN in patients with clinically localized disease with respect to surgical margin status. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent RPN for clinically localized renal masses from June 2007 to December 2012 at Washington University School of Medicine. Disease recurrence and overall survival (OS) were stratified on the presence or absence of PSM. The cohort was analyzed to identify patient- and tumor-specific characteristics associated with PSM. Results: We identified 374 RPNs performed from 2007 to 2012 with a mean follow-up time of 77.7 months (SD 32.2 months). PSM was identified in 12 (3.2%) patients. Patients with PSM were at 14-fold increased risk for recurrence with no difference in OS (p < 0.001, p = 0.130, respectively). Patients with PSM had higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (25% vs 6.4%) and greater blood loss (425 mL vs 203 mL). Conclusion: With an extended follow-up period of 77 months after RPN, we found that PSM substantially increased the risk of recurrence without impacting OS. Our finding that PSM may occur more frequently in older patients with COPD must be confirmed in larger studies.
| S-EPMC8252897 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo compare perioperative outcomes and Trifecta achievement of modified robot-assisted simple enucleation (MRASE) with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for treating clinical T1b renal tumors.MethodsWe analyzed 203 patients who underwent MRASE or RAPN for clinical T1b renal tumors at our institution from September 2014 to June 2018. The two groups were compared regarding perioperative outcome variables. Trifecta was defined as no perioperative complications, negative surgical margin, and ischemia time ≤25 minutes.ResultsIn all, 139 patients underwent MRASE and 64 underwent RAPN respectively. Patients in the MRASE group had shorter operative time (197.7 vs. 215.6 min, P=0.039) and warm ischemic time (21.2 vs. 24.1 min, P=0.004) in comparison to the RAPN group. The groups were comparable in estimated blood loss (230.5 vs. 269.8 mL, P=0.259). Tumor bed suturing was performed with a significantly lower frequency in the MRASE group than in the RAPN group (11.5% vs. 90.6%, P<0.01). The incidence of perioperative complications was similar. The rate of positive surgical margins was similar in both groups (2.2% vs. 6.3%, P=0.284). Trifecta was achieved in 61.2% and 42.2% of MRASE and RAPN patients (P=0.012). On multivariable analysis, the type of procedure, RENAL score, estimated blood loss, and operative time were positive factors for the achievement of Trifecta.ConclusionsIn this series MRASE was superior to RAPN with regard to the achievement of Trifecta in treating T1b renal tumors. Besides, MRASE had better outcomes for shorter operative time, shorter warm ischemic time, and less need for tumor bed suturing as compared with RAPN.
| S-EPMC8039591 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of early vascular release in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to reduce warm ischaemia time (WIT) and minimise renal dysfunction. RAPN is increasingly utilised in the management of small renal masses. To this end it is imperative that WIT is kept to a minimum to maintain renal function.MethodsRAPN was performed via a four-arm robotic transperitoneal approach. The renal artery and vein were individually clamped with robotic vascular bulldog clamps to allow cold scissor excision of the tumour. The cut surface was then sutured with one or two running 3-0 V-Loc (TM) sutures, following which the vascular clamps were released. Specific bleeding vessels were then selectively oversewn and the collecting system repaired. Renorrhaphy was then completed using a running horizontal mattress 0-0 V-Loc (TM) suture.ResultsA total of 16 patients underwent RAPN with a median WIT of 15 minutes (range: 8-25), operative time 230 minutes (range: 180-280) and blood loss of 100 mL (range: 50-1000). There were no transfusions, secondary haemorrhages or urine leaks. There was one focal positive margin in a central 5.5 cm pT3a renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Long-term estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was not significantly different to pre-operative values.ConclusionIn this patient series, early vascular release effectively minimised WIT and maintained renal function without compromising perioperative safety.
| S-EPMC4431378 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe assessed the natural history of renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).MethodsFrom May 2016 to September 2020, 106 patients underwent RAPN for renal tumors at our institution. Among 100 patients, excluding 6 who were ineligible for contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), 4 underwent renal artery selective embolization (RAE), of which 2 cases were emergency RAE within 7 days after RAPN and the other 2 were prophylactic RAE 8 or more days after RAPN. In 98 patients examined for the clinical course of asymptomatic RAP managed by surveillance, excluding the 2 who underwent emergency RAE, routine CE-CT was performed at 7 days, 1 month and 3 months after RAPN. Factors influencing the occurrence of RAP among these 98 patients, including the 2 who underwent emergency RAE and excluding the 2 who underwent prophylactic RAE, were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.ResultsMedian [interquartile range (IOR), range] observation period, age, radiographic tumor size, and maximum diameter of RAP were 20.8 (23.9, 3.0-57.6) months, 63 (18, 22-84) years, 23 (11, 9-48) mm, and 6.6 (5.2, 3.0-16.0) mm, respectively. CE-CT detected 28 RAPs in 23 (23.0%) of 100 patients by 7 days after RAPN and routine CE-CT detected 25 RAPs in 21 (21.4%) of 98 patients excluding 2 who underwent emergency RAE at 7 days after RAPN. RAP was diagnosed by routine CE-CT in 21 (21.4%), 1 (1.0%), and 0 (0%) patients at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months after RAPN, respectively. In univariate analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) 0.144: 69-84 vs. 22-56 years old, P=0.0179], R.E.N.A.L [radius (tumor size as maximal diameter), exophytic/endophytic properties of tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and location relative to polar line] nephrometry score (OR 1.374, P=0.0382), warm ischemic time (OR 1.085, P=0.0393), and renorrhaphy time (OR 1.055, P=0.0408) were significantly associated with the occurrence of RAP. In multivariate analysis, only age (OR 0.124, P=0.0148) was a significant factor.ConclusionsAsymptomatic RAP up to 15 mm in diameter resolved spontaneously 3 months after RAPN. Young age (under 56 years) may be a factor in the development of RAP.
| S-EPMC8511543 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Objective The objective of this work is to assess the relationship between the morphological characteristics of a central tumour and the perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Subjects and Methods We retrospectively analysed the data from 186 patients with central tumours involving the renal sinus, who underwent RAPN in a single‐centre study between February 2015 and June 2022. All cases were assigned a RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative images. The shape of the protruding portion of the tumour was classified into four types: ‘flat’, ‘spherical’, ‘single‐hump’, and ‘complex‐hump’, and was independently assessed by two readers. The trifecta is defined as the warm ischemia time within 25 min, negative surgical margins, and no major postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with the failing trifecta. Results Trifecta was achieved in 113 cases (60.8%), and the achievement rate in flat, spherical, single‐hump, and complex‐hump types was 83.3%, 74.5%, 64.3%, and 21.3%, respectively. Prolonged warm ischemia time was the primary cause of the failure to achieve the trifecta. The rate of positive surgical margins and upstage to pathological T3a was greater for complex humps while the rate of major complications and postoperative GFR preservation did not differ between shapes. On multivariate analysis for failing trifecta achievement, the complex‐hump protrusion was found to be an independent positive predictor (odds ratio: 15.8; p < 0.001), whereas the height and width of protrusion were not significantly related. Conclusions The degree of difficulty varied among central tumours, and it was not possible to precisely measure it with existing scoring systems. Complex‐hump protrusions strongly correlate with failure to achieve the trifecta. Preoperative assessment of the morphology of protrusion is useful for predicting outcomes.
| S-EPMC10447216 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes between robot-assisted (CRO-RAPN) vs. laparoscopic (CRO-LPN) methods of cortical-renorrhaphy-omitting partial nephrectomy. Between July 2012 and June 2020, patients with localized clinical T1-2 renal masses who underwent CRO-RAPN or CRO-LPN were reviewed. The outcomes of the two groups were compared using propensity-score matching. Trifecta was defined as negative surgical margin, warm ischemic time < 25 min, and absence of complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or more until three months postoperatively. The preservation rate of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated at six months postoperatively. Among 291 patients (CRO-RAPN, n = 210; CRO-LPN, n = 81) included in the study, 150 matched pairs of patients were analyzed. Compared to the CRO-LPN group, the CRO-RAPN group was associated with shorter warm ischemic time (13 min vs. 20 min, P < 0.001), shorter total operation time (162 min vs. 212 min, P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (40 mL vs. 119 mL, P = 0.002), lower incidence of overall complications (3% vs. 16%, P = 0.001), higher preservation rate of eGFR at six months postoperatively (93% vs. 89%, P = 0.003), and higher trifecta achievement rate (84% vs. 64%, P = 0.004). CRO-RAPN contributed to shorter warm ischemic time, less blood loss, fewer complications, and higher preservation of renal function, all of which allowed this technique to achieve a higher rate of trifecta compared to CRO-LPN.
| S-EPMC9338244 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMucinous cystadenocarcinoma (MC) of the kidney is a rare renal epithelial tumor originating from the renal pelvic urothelium. There are only a few published reports on MC. Due to its rare and unknown tissue origin, its diagnosis is difficult which almost can be diagnosed through the pathological method.Case presentationIn this case report, we report a female patient whose chief complaint was low back pain lasting for one month. The three-dimensional computed tomography scan of the urinary system detected approximately 7 cm of a left renal cystic mass. The renal cystic mass was diagnosed as MC after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The MC originated from the kidney after completing colorectal adenocarcinoma and ovarian adenocarcinoma.ConclusionsWe reported a case of MC of the kidney which was a rare renal tumor. We not only aimed to present an unusual case of MC and review the previous literature on its pathology and differential diagnosis, but also used new method to treat this type of tumor.
| S-EPMC9852041 | biostudies-literature