Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie’s disease: a review of surgical considerations, approaches, and maneuvers
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Good J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10891387 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the mainstay of surgical treatment for patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) and concomitant medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. Special considerations and adjunctive surgical techniques during the IPP procedure are often required for patients with PD to improve residual penile curvature, as well as postoperative penile length. The surgical outcomes and various adjunctive techniques are not significantly different from one another, and selection of the appropriate technique must be tailored to patient-specific factors including the extent of the deformity, the degree of penile shortening, and preoperative patient expectations. The aims of this review were to assess the current literature on published outcomes and surgical techniques involving IPP placement in the treatment of PD. Patient satisfaction and preferences are reported, along with the description and patient selection for surgical techniques that include manual penile modeling, management of refractory curvature with concurrent plication, and correction of severe residual curvature and penile shortening with tunica release and plaque incision and grafting. A thorough description of the available techniques and their associated outcomes may help guide surgeons to the most appropriate choice for their patients.
| S-EPMC4524455 | biostudies-other
Project description:Penile rehabilitation after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation for the treatment of erectile dysfunction includes leaving the device partially inflated so as to preserve the penile length and to maintain hemostasis. With a partially inflated device, the penis becomes more sensitive and more susceptible to unintended insults during the immediate postoperative management. The "Wang Collar," a device intended to protect the penis in the early postoperative period, is hereby described. Three hundred and forty-eight patients had the "Wang Collar" included as part of their post-IPP management from August 2014 to February 2019. The protective collar, devised from a polystyrene cup with the bottom removed, is secured with a tape over the previously dressed and partially inflated penis. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of this device, we conducted surveys on the perioperative staff at three different institutions. The "Wang Collar" has been found to be beneficial in the early postoperative care of patients. Based on the answers to our questionnaire, the perioperative personnel found this device to be highly protective, especially when transporting the patient after IPP surgery, easy to work with, and almost never bothersome or irritative to the patient. We present a novel penile device after IPP placement, which we have found to improve patient satisfaction in the postoperative period. In addition, it eases the care of the patient by the perioperative staff. It is now our routine to use this device after IPP surgery. Further research is necessary to evaluate whether this device can decrease postoperative wound complications.
| S-EPMC7523615 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveMale stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are well established diagnoses within Men's Health, often more specifically within the prostate cancer survivorship cohort. Taken individually, well defined treatment algorithms exist with which many surgeons are comfortable; however, treatment of both in a single setting or staged fashion introduces complexity. Emerging treatment options also exist, and there is immature or minimal data when these are combined with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion, radiation history, and/or variable degrees of incontinence. Our objective was to describe and summarize the currently available treatment options for SUI particularly at the time of IPP insertion.MethodsA literature review was performed to summarize contemporary treatment of SUI at time of IPP placement. Anecdotal experience was added from high volume, subspecialty trained Men's Health and Reconstructive Urologists.Key content and findingsNon-invasive approaches such as pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), behavioral modification, and external compression devices play some limited role in treatment and/or management of SUI, particularly in the early post operative period, or for those unwilling or unable to undergo more definitive intervention. More invasive options such as artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, male sling, or other implantable devices are more appropriate for good surgical candidates with higher bother and/or more severe incontinence. These options can be concomitant or staged relative to IPP placement. Climacturia, particularly with mild or no bothersome SUI, can successfully be addressed at the time of penile prosthesis placement with the utilization of the Mini-Jupette suburethral sling.ConclusionsA variety of treatment options exist for concomitant treatment of SUI at time of IPP, and both safety and efficacy have been demonstrated for many in the same operative setting. As with treatment of ED or SUI in isolation, patient selection, careful counseling, and management of expectations can lead to high patient satisfaction.
| S-EPMC10932632 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivePenile prostheses are an option for the management of erectile dysfunction (ED). Over the years penile prosthesis surgery has become increasingly safe owing to improvements such as antibiotic usage, coated devices, and surgical techniques. However, infection remains a dreaded complication during prosthesis surgery. Efforts to minimize risk of infection in the perioperative period have been extensively studied. Herein, we performed a narrative review on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies for infection prevention during placement of a penile prosthesis with a comparison of infection prevention strategies to other surgical fields.MethodsA literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies evaluating perioperative management of penile prosthesis infection were included. The following search terms were used to for our literature search: penile prosthesis, inflatable penile prosthesis, infection, prevention, perioperative management. Articles were graded based on the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) guidelines and a table was generated with each intervention discussed and its level of evidence based on current literature.Key content and findingsOptimization of patient's comorbid conditions can help reduce risk during prosthesis operations. Monitoring and optimizing a patient's glycemic control has been investigated, but the current literature does not necessarily support a strict hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or pre-operative blood glucose level. Surgical field preparation using chlorhexidine-based solutions has been shown to be superior to iodine-based solutions. Appropriately selected peri-operative antibiotics have also been shown to reduce infection risk. Intraoperatively, the use of coated devices in addition to a 'no touch' technique have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infection. Post operatively, available evidence of antibiotic use has not been demonstrated to be effective in reducing infection rates.ConclusionsSurgical infection following placement of an IPP is a devastating and morbid complication with infection rate up as high as 1-3% in virgin cases and 7-18% in revision cases. While perioperative techniques exist and have reduced risk of infection, more prospective data is needed to evaluate the clinical significance of these different approaches. More research in these areas, along with future options such as nanoparticles, antibiotic coated suture, and next generation sequencing (NGS) for bacterial pathogens, may shed light on further ways to optimize infection reduction strategies for prosthesis surgery.
| S-EPMC11399021 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlternative reservoir placement is increasingly popular during inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery to prevent intraperitoneal positioning, bowel, bladder, or vascular injury in patients with prior pelvic surgeries. Counter incision (CI) can be used for submuscular reservoir placement in high risk patients, however series exploring the safety remain limited.MethodsA database of IPP surgeries was queried for use of a CI during reservoir placement to compare 90-day clinical outcomes in a retrospective case-control study. Primary outcome was device infections, with secondary outcomes including reservoir herniation, hematoma, device malfunction rates, and operative times. Groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Squared tests, with multivariate logistic regression models to identify predictors of infectious complications.ResultsA total of 534 cases met criteria, of which 51 (9.6%) used a CI for reservoir placement. The CI cohort included significantly more removal and replacements, 45.1% vs. 20.9% (P<0.001). Thirty-one CI patients (61.0%) had undergone prior prostatectomy compared to 134 (27.7%) non-CI patients (P=0.001). The most common reasons for CI were prior prostatectomy and inguinal hernia repair. Median operative time was 17 minutes longer in the CI group (74 vs. 57 minutes, P<0.001). Device infection rates were similar (2.0% vs. 4.1%, P=0.71), as were rates of hematoma (5.9% vs. 2.7%, P=0.19), and device malfunction (0.0% vs. 1.4% P=1.00).ConclusionsComplication rates were similar between CI and non-CI cohorts, even in a subset where approximately half the cases were removal and replacements. For physicians not comfortable with alternative placement through a penoscrotal or infrapubic incision, this offers a reasonable alternative and permits use of three-piece devices in patients with a hostile pelvis.
| S-EPMC7807340 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) in a transgender patient's neophallus carries unique considerations versus cis-gender IPP placement in mitigating infection, erosion, and overall complication rates. An example of this includes the lack of an anatomical corpus cavernosum and crura for cylinder placement and anchoring. Multiple grafting approaches and materials have been utilized to mitigate possible cylinder instability and improve anchoring. Here we describe our experience and surgical technique in IPP neophallus placement utilizing a single cylinder with distal and proximal cylinder human cadaver pericardium (Tutoplast®, IOP Ophthalmics, Costa Mesa, CA, USA) grafts. Our goals were to determine postoperative satisfaction and device functionality in patients undergoing transgender neophallus IPP placement using our technique. Both patients report satisfaction and no complications at last follow-up (currently up to 14 and 23 months post-operatively, respectively) with satisfactory erectile function and ability to perform penetrative intercourse. In neophallus IPP placement, the anatomical differences compared to cis-gender IPP operations require unique considerations such as cylinder grafting material selection for proximal cylinder fixation and mitigation of device erosion rates. Optimization of grafting material in neophallus IPP placement in an effort to reduce erosion rates has become increasingly important as frequency of this operation increases. Utilizing human cadaver pericardium graft in distal and proximal cylinder coverage shows beneficial preliminary outcomes in our patients.
| S-EPMC10481199 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6337945 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and the utilization of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) among prostate cancer patients are understudied. The aim of the study was to examine the relationships between ED, prostate cancer treatment type and IPP implantation in a national cohort.Materials and methodsWe identified a retrospective cohort of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare patients diagnosed with locoregional prostate cancer between 2006 and 2011 and treated with surgery or radiation. Chi-square tests were used to detect significant differences in ED rates as well as use of IPP among the subset with ED. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with the use of IPP.ResultsAmong 31,233 patients in our cohort, 10,334 (33.1%) received prostatectomy and 20,899 (66.9%) received radiation. ED within 5 years was significantly more common in the prostatectomy group relative to those the radiation group (65.3% vs. 33.8%, p<0.001). In the subset of 13,812 patients with ED, the radiation group had greater median time to ED diagnosis compared to the prostatectomy group (346 vs. 133 days, p<0.001). IPP implantation was more frequent for prostatectomy patients than for radiation patients (3.6% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001). Cancer treatment type, race, and marital status were significantly associated with IPP utilization.ConclusionsED is highly prevalent among prostate cancer patients, and IPP implantation is be underutilized. ED rates, time to ED diagnosis and utilization of IPP differed significantly by prostate cancer treatment type.
| S-EPMC9091830 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To retrospectively review a series of men who underwent attempted inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion into severely scarred corpora, and to analyze the surgical techniques and instruments that contributed to a successful outcome.All IPP procedures done by a high-volume prosthetic surgeon during a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients with severe intracorporal fibrosis underwent 15 attempted IPP insertion procedures, and are the subject of this review.A standardized surgical approach was employed for all patients. Thirteen of the 15 procedures were successful (i.e., an IPP was inserted, with satisfactory cylinder position). One procedure failed due to corporal obliteration. One patient underwent an initial failed attempt, but was successfully implanted 10 months later. Two of the 14 patients (14%) developed peri-prosthetic infection and were explanted.IPP insertion into scarred corpora is difficult and occasionally impossible. We have developed a standardized surgical approach for these cases, using limited corporal excavation, followed by the use of sequential Uramix and then Carrion-Rossello cavernotomes, that we feel has improved our chance of a successful implant. However, due to the rarity of these cases, it is not possible to make definitive statements concerning the optimal surgical technique.
| S-EPMC5527169 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11535744 | biostudies-literature