Development and Validation of Deep Learning Model for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Survival with Transarterial Chemoembolization (MC-hccAI 002): a Retrospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Chen Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10905396 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND:Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the second cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the best treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Doxorubicin is the most commonly used drug despite a low level of evidence. AIM:To compare the objective response rate of idarubicin-based TACE (Ida-TACE) against doxorubicin-based TACE (Dox-TACE) in intermediate stage HCC. METHODS:Between January 2012 and December 2014, all patients treated with TACE at our academic hospital were screened. Inclusion criteria were patients with Child-Pugh score A or B, a performance status below or equal to 1, and no prior TACE. Either lipiodol TACE or drug-eluting beads TACE could be performed with 10 mg of idarubicin or 50 mg of doxorubicin. Each patient treated with idarubicin was matched with two doxorubicin-treated patients. The TACE response was assessed by independent radiologists according to the mRECIST criteria. RESULTS:Sixty patients were treated with doxorubicin and thirty with idarubicin. There were 93% and 87% of cirrhotic patients and 87% and 70% of Child-Pugh A in the doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. The median number of HCC per patient was two in both groups with 31% and 26% of single nodules in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Objective response rate after first TACE was 76.7% and 73.3% (P = 0.797) with 41.7% and 40.0% complete response in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Progression-free survival was 7.7 mo in both groups, and liver transplant-free survival was 24.9 mo and 21.9 mo in doxorubicin and idarubicin groups, respectively. Safety profiles were similar in both groups, with grade 3-4 adverse events in 35% of Dox-TACE and 43% of Ida-TACEs. CONCLUSION:Ida-TACE and Dox-TACE showed comparable results in terms of efficacy and safety. Ida-TACE may represent an interesting alternative to Dox-TACE in the management of patients with intermediate stage HCC.
| S-EPMC6969879 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard first-line therapy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no latent-classing indices, concerning repeat conventional TACE or switching to another treatment, have been incorporated into the guidelines. Methods: The unsupervised latent class modeling was applied to identify subphenotypes using the clinical and medical imaging data of 1517 HCC patients after the first TACE from four hospitals (derivation cohort: 597 cases; validation cohort: 920 cases); modeling was conducted independently in each cohort. We then explored the relationship of subphenotypes with clinical outcomes in both cohorts and response to treatment strategies after the first TACE in the derivation cohort. Results: Independent latent class models suggested that a three-class model was optimal for both cohorts. In both cohorts, we identified a TACE-refractory subphenotype (Phenotype 1: PS score 1, stage progress, more intrahepatic lesions, and new intrahepatic lesions), TACE-responsive subphenotype (Phenotype 3: PS score 0, No intrahepatic lesions and new intrahepatic lesions), compared to TACE-intermediate subphenotype (Phenotype 2). Compared to Phenotype 1 or 2, patients in Phenotype 3 had significantly lower 3-month or 3-year mortality (all P<0.001). In the derivation cohort, the effects of treatment strategy (surgery/ablation vs. repeat TACE vs. stop TACE) differed significantly in phenotype 2 but not in phenotype 3 (P=0.721 for interaction). Conclusions: Latent class models identified three subphenotypes for HCC after the first TACE treatment. Differences were significant in clinical outcome and response to treatment strategy after the first TACE among three subphenotypes.
| S-EPMC9516009 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being challenged by increasing studies supporting liver resection (LR); but evidence of survival benefits of LR is lacking. We aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of LR with that of TACE for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC in cirrhotic patients.MethodsA Markov model, comparing LR with TACE over 15 years, was developed based on the data from 31 literatures. Additionally, external validation of the model was performed using a data set (n = 1735; LR: 701; TACE: 1034) from a tertiary center with propensity score matching method. We conducted one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses, in addition to a Monte Carlo analysis with 10 000 patients allocated into each arm.ResultsThe mean expected survival times and survival rates at 5 years were 77.8 months and 47.1% in LR group, and 48.6 months and 25.7% in TACE group, respectively. Sensitivity analyses found that initial LR was the most favorable treatment. The 95% CI for the difference in OS was 2.42-2.46 years between the two groups (P < 0.001). In the validation set, the 5-year survival rates after LR were significantly better than those after TACE before (40.2% vs. 25.9%, P < 0.001) and after matching (43.2% vs 30.9%, P < 0.001), which was comparable to the model results.ConclusionsFor cirrhotic patients with resectable intermediate-stage HCC, LR may provide survival benefit over TACE, but large-scale studies are required to further stratify patients at this stage for different optimal treatments.
| S-EPMC6488138 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Prognosis of patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is unsatisfactory. The present study analyzed the indications for suitable TACE in patients with intermediate stage HCC. Additionally, it was investigated whether further TACE or switching to multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) was more beneficial for patients with HCC recurrence following initial TACE. The present retrospective study included 238 patients with intermediate stage HCC who were initially treated with TACE (median age, 74 years). A decision-tree analysis was employed to investigate the therapeutic effect profiles and overall survival (OS) rates. In the decision-tree analysis for OS, complete response (CR) by initial TACE was selected as the most important variable. In the decision-tree analysis for CR, <3 liver segments with nodule, simple nodular type and within the up-to-seven criteria were selected as the first, second and third variables associated with a high CR rate (35-64%), respectively. In patients with HCC recurrence having ≥3 liver segments with nodule, out of the up-to-seven criteria, and Child-Pugh class A, the median survival time was significantly longer in those who were treated by switching to MKIs compared with further TACE (44.9 vs. 21.9 months; P=0.003). In intermediate stage HCC, the indications for suitable TACE criteria may be '<3 liver segments with nodule', 'simple nodular type', and 'within the up-to-seven criteria'. Additionally, in patients who were ineligible for TACE criteria, the switch to MKIs may improve the prognosis compared with further TACE in cases of HCC recurrence following first TACE.
| S-EPMC7068224 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, all intermediate-stage HCC patients did not benefit from TACE treatment because intermediate-stage HCC encompasses a wide variety of HCCs. Owing to remarkable progress in systemic therapy, including molecular-targeted therapy for advanced-stage HCC, the standard treatment of HCC has recently shifted to systemic therapy. However, it remains controversial as to which treatment should be initially performed for intermediate-stage HCC. In addition, although curative treatment can be considered when the tumor shrinks, the timing of conversion therapy remains uncertain. This review summarizes the advances of HCC treatment and discusses treatment strategies for intermediate-stage HCC.
| S-EPMC10046825 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSwitching to systemic therapy after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness is more inclined to preserve liver function and decrease disease progression. Hence, we conducted a comparison between the advantages of sorafenib therapy and the continuation of TACE in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who developed TACE refractoriness.MethodsThis retrospective cohort work involved 1,200 patients with HCC who received TACE therapy at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022. Out of these, a total of 436 participants were determined to be resistant to TACE treatment throughout their clinical progression. Out of them, 271 were finally included and categorized into two groups: (1) patients who shifted from TACE to sorafenib, and (2) patients who maintained TACE treatment. The study assessed the overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTDP) of patients who were resistant to TACE, comparing both groups based on when they achieved Child-Pugh C or acquired advanced-stage HCC.ResultsFollowing confirmation of refractoriness to TACE therapy, 163 opted to continue with TACE (TACE group), whereas 108 shifted to sorafenib treatment (sorafenib group). The median TTDP was 23.36 months, while the median OS was 25.3 months, in the sorafenib group, and 11.6 and 14.2 months, correspondingly, in the TACE group (p = 0.0001).ConclusionSwitching to sorafenib treatment significantly improved OS and TTDP in patients with intermediate-stage HCC who were refractory to TACE. These finding highlights sorafenib's potential as an effective alternative for managing disease progression in patients unresponsive to TACE, offering a valuable treatment option in this challenging clinical scenario.
| S-EPMC11603851 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIntermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), defined according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, is a heterogeneous condition with variable clinical benefits from transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to develop a simple validated prognostic score based on the predictive factors for survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC treated with TACE.MethodsThree-hundred and fifty patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing initial TACE at Chiba University Hospital (training cohort; n = 187) and two affiliated hospitals (validation cohort; n = 163) were included. Following variables were entered into univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to develop a points-based clinical scoring system: gender, age, etiology, pretreatment, Child-Pugh score, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, C-reactive protein, alfa-fetoprotein, size of the largest lesion, and number and location of lesions.ResultsThe number of lesions and the Child-Pugh score were identified as independent prognostic factors in the training cohort. The development of a 0-7-point prognostic score, named the Chiba HCC in intermediate-stage prognostic (CHIP) score, was based on the sum of three subscale scores (Child-Pugh score = 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively, number of lesions = 0, 2, or 3, respectively, HCV-RNA positivity = 0 or 1, respectively). The generated scores were then differentiated into five groups (0-2 points, 3 points, 4 points, 5 points, and 6-7 points) by the median survival time (65.2, 29.2, 24.3, 13.1, and 8.4 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). These results were confirmed in the external validation cohort (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe CHIP score is easy-to-use and may assist in finding an appropriate treatment strategy for intermediate-stage HCC.
| S-EPMC4412579 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has an established role in advanced HCC. The present study evaluates the role of TACE as a neoadjuvant modality in the management of intermediate HCC [Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) stage IIB].Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis of HCC patients treated between January 2010 and August 2022 was performed. Patients belonging to intermediate-stage HCC (HKLC IIB) were divided into two groups, upfront surgery (UPS) and post-TACE (pTACE). Propensity score matching was done, and the primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 247 patients of HKLC IIB were identified during this period. Of these, 77 patients in each group were considered for analysis after propensity matching. The median follow-up was 36.4 months (0.46-144.26). In the propensity matched population (n = 154), on an intention-to-treat analysis, the median OS of the UPS group and the pTACE group was 30.06 and 39.26 months, respectively (p value = 0.77). In patients who underwent curative resection, the median OS of the UPS group was 30.68 versus 90.97 months in the pTACE group (p value = 0.006) and median DFS was 13.56 months for the UPS group versus 44.02 months in the pTACE group, respectively (p value = 0.013).ConclusionIn intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HKLC IIB), pTACE can be used to better select patients with borderline resectability. Survival was significantly improved in patients who received pTACE and were able to undergo surgical resection.
| S-EPMC11798681 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe selection criteria for hepatic resection (HR) in intermediate-stage (IM) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still controversial. We used real-world data to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in treatment with HR or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).MethodsIn total, 942 patients with IM-HCC were categorized into the HR group and the TACE group. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Curve smoothing was performed through the generalized additive model. The interaction test was performed to evaluate the impact of HR on OS concerning risk factors. Also, we used multiple imputation to deal with missing data.ResultsIn total, 23.0% (n = 225) of patients received HR. At a median OS of 23.7 months, HR was associated with improved OS in the multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HzR) = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.35-0.58; after PSM: HzR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.41-0.77]. Landmark analyses limited to long-term survivors of ≥6 months, ≥1 year, and ≥2 years demonstrated better OS with HR in all subsets (all p < 0.05). After PSM analysis, however, HR increased the risk of death by 20% (HzR = 1.20, 95%CI = 0.67-2.15) in the subgroup of patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≤192 U/L (p for interaction = 0.037). Furthermore, the significant interaction was robust between the LDH and HR with respect to the 1-, 3-, and 5-year observed survival rates (all p < 0.05).ConclusionHR was superior to TACE for intermediate-stage HCC in patients with LDH levels >192 U/L. Moreover, TACE might be suitable for patients with LDH levels ≤192 U/L.
| S-EPMC8579001 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDue to the heterogeneity of patients with Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Bolondi criteria were proposed and patients were divided into four substages. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival of substage B1 patients who were initially treated with a combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (TACE-RFA) or TACE alone.Methods404 patients with stage B1 HCC were retrospectively analyzed from January 2005 to December 2012. 209 patients received TACE-RFA, and 195 received TACE alone as initial treatment. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.Results1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 83.7%, 45.8%, and 24.8% in the TACE-RFA group and 80.7%, 26.4%, and 16.7% in the TACE group, respectively (P=0.003). The corresponding PFS rates were 71.8%, 26.6%, and 13.0% and 59.1%, 11.0%, and 2.2% in the TACE-RFA group and TACE group, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that tumor size (OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.683, P=0.001; PFS: HR = 0.761, P=0.013), along with treatment allocation (OS: HR = 0.701, P=0.003; PFS: HR = 0.620, P < 0.001), was the independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS.ConclusionsCombination TACE and RFA treatment yielded better survival than TACE alone for patients with stage B1 HCC according to the Bolondi criteria.
| S-EPMC6766138 | biostudies-literature