Dataset Information

Evaluating the effects of simulation training on stroke thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Ischaemic strokes are medical emergencies, and reperfusion treatment, most commonly intravenous thrombolysis, is time-critical. Thrombolysis administration relies on well-organised pathways of care with highly skilled and efficient clinicians. Simulation training is a widespread teaching modality, but results from studies on the impact of this intervention have yet to be synthesised. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise the evidence and provide a recommendation regarding the effects of simulation training for healthcare professionals on door-to-needle time in the emergency thrombolysis of patients with ischaemic stroke.

Methods

Seven electronic databases were systematically searched (last updated 12th July 2023) for eligible full-text articles and conference abstracts. Results were screened for relevance by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome was door-to-needle time for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration in emergency patients with ischaemic stroke. The secondary outcomes were learner-centred, improvements in knowledge and communication, self-perceived usefulness of training, and feeling 'safe' in thrombolysis-related decision-making. Data were extracted, risk of study bias assessed, and analysis was performed using RevMan™ software (Web version 5.6.0, The Cochrane Collaboration). The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument.

Results

Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis and nineteen in the qualitative synthesis (n = 20,189 total patients). There were statistically significant effects of simulation training in reducing door-to-needle time; mean difference of 15 min [95% confidence intervals (CI) 8 to 21 min]; in improving healthcare professionals' acute stroke care knowledge; risk ratio (RR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.60); and in feeling 'safe' in thrombolysis-related decision-making; RR 0.46 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.59). Furthermore, simulation training improved healthcare professionals' communication and was self-perceived as useful training.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that simulation training improves door-to-needle times for the delivery of thrombolysis in ischaemic stroke. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of the included studies.

SUBMITTER: Aljuwaiser S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10905914 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluating the effects of simulation training on stroke thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aljuwaiser Sameera S Abdel-Fattah Abdel Rahman AR Brown Craig C Kane Leia L Cooper Jamie J Mostafa Alyaa A

Advances in simulation (London, England) 20240229 1

<h4>Background</h4>Ischaemic strokes are medical emergencies, and reperfusion treatment, most commonly intravenous thrombolysis, is time-critical. Thrombolysis administration relies on well-organised pathways of care with highly skilled and efficient clinicians. Simulation training is a widespread teaching modality, but results from studies on the impact of this intervention have yet to be synthesised. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise the evidence and provide a recomm ...[more]

PMID: 38424568

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:There is increasing recognition of the importance of stroke in females to both clinical and public health. The natural course of stroke is worse in females than in males, but the evidence regarding sex disparities in the responses to thrombolysis in stroke patents is still controversial. We compared outcomes after thrombolysis treatment between females and males. METHODS:Clinical trials reported in the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases up to March 13, 2017 were included in this analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and conducted quality assessments. Statistical tests were performed to check for heterogeneity and publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to evaluate the stability of the conclusions. RESULTS:Sixteen reports involving 60,159 patients were available for analysis. The female patients were a 0.89-fold [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.87-0.90, p<0.001], 0.89-fold (95% CI=0.87-0.91, p<0.001), and 1.24-fold (95% CI=1.11-1.36, p<0.001) more likely to obtain good, excellent, and poor functional outcomes, respectively, with no significant difference in the complications of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage among the sexes [risk ratios (RR)=0.99, 95% CI=0.92-1.07, p=0.81] after thrombolysis treatment. In addition, the prevalence of a good functional outcome did not differ significantly between females and males in the intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) group (RR=1.05, 95% CI=0.85-1.29, p=0.67) in a subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS:This study has demonstrated that females often exhibit a worse outcome than males after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), whereas no relevant sex differences were found in outcome or recanalization after IAT, with safety regarding hemorrhage complications from thrombolysis being the same for the sexes. However, IVT should not be withheld from female stroke patients solely based on their sex before the findings are confirmed in further large-scale research.

Project description:OBJECTIVES: The current review examines the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education (SBME) for training health professionals in cardiac physical examination and examines the relative effectiveness of key instructional design features. METHODS: Data sources included a comprehensive, systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus through May 2011. Included studies investigated SBME to teach health profession learners cardiac physical examination skills using outcomes of knowledge or skill. We carried out duplicate assessment of study quality and data abstraction and pooled effect sizes using random effects. RESULTS: We identified 18 articles for inclusion. Thirteen compared SBME to no-intervention (either single group pre-post comparisons or SBME added to other instruction common to all learners, such as traditional bedside teaching), three compared SBME to other educational interventions, and two compared two SBME interventions. Meta-analysis of the 13 no-intervention comparison studies demonstrated that simulation-based instruction in cardiac auscultation was effective, with pooled effect sizes of 1.10 (95 % CI 0.49-1.72; p?<?0.001; I(2)?=?92.4 %) for knowledge outcomes and 0.87 (95 % CI 0.52-1.22; p?<?0.001; I(2) = 91.5 %) for skills. In sub-group analysis, hands-on practice with the simulator appeared to be an important teaching technique. Narrative review of the comparative effectiveness studies suggests that SBME may be of similar effectiveness to other active educational interventions, but more studies are required. LIMITATIONS: The quantity of published evidence and the relative lack of comparative effectiveness studies limit this review. CONCLUSIONS: SBME is an effective educational strategy for teaching cardiac auscultation. Future studies should focus on comparing key instructional design features and establishing SBME's relative effectiveness compared to other educational interventions.

Dataset Information

Evaluating the effects of simulation training on stroke thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evaluating the effects of simulation training on stroke thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets