High Rate of Kidney Graft Failure after Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Okumura K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10914208 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
High Rate of Kidney Graft Failure after Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation.
Okumura Kenji K Ohira Suguru S Kai Masashi M Misawa Ryosuke R Wolfe Kevin K Sogawa Hiroshi H Veillette Gregory G Nishida Seigo S Spielvogel David D Lansman Steven S Dhand Abhay A
Kidney360 20240125 2
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundIn spite of renal graft shortage and increasing waiting times for transplant candidates, simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) is an increasingly performed procedure established for patients with combined end-stage cardiac and renal failure. Although data on renal graft outcome in this setting is limited, reports on reduced graft survival in comparison to solitary kidney transplantation (KTx) have led to an ongoing discussion of adequate organ utilization.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted to evaluate prognostic factors and outcomes of 27 patients undergoing HKTx in comparison to a matched cohort of 27 patients undergoing solitary KTx between September 1987 and October 2019 in one of Europe's largest transplant centers.ResultsMedian follow-up was 100.33 (0.46-362.09) months. Despite lower five-year kidney graft survival (62.6% versus 92.1%; 111.73 versus 183.08 months; p = 0.189), graft function and patient survival (138.90 versus 192.71 months; p = 0.128) were not significantly inferior after HKTx in general. However, in case of prior cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy we observed significantly reduced early graft and patient survival (57.00 and 94.09 months, respectively) when compared to patients undergoing solitary KTx (183.08 and 192.71 months; p < 0.001, respectively) or HKTx without prior cardiac surgery (203.22 and 203.22 months; p = 0.016 and p = 0.019, respectively), most probably explained by the significantly increased rate of primary nonfunction (33.3%) and in-hospital mortality (25.0%).ConclusionsOur data demonstrates the increased rate of early kidney graft loss and thus significantly inferior graft survival in high-risk patients undergoing HKTx. Thus, we advocate for a "kidney-after-heart" program in such patients to ensure responsible and reasonable utilization of scarce resources in times of ongoing organ shortage crisis.
| S-EPMC8268408 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Individual HLA mismatches may differentially impact graft survival after kidney transplantation. Therefore, there is a need for a reliable tool to define permissible HLA mismatches in kidney transplantation. We previously demonstrated that donor-derived Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes presented by recipient HLA class II (PIRCHE-II) play a role in de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies formation after kidney transplantation. In the present Dutch multi-center study, we evaluated the possible association between PIRCHE-II and kidney graft failure in 2,918 donor-recipient couples that were transplanted between 1995 and 2005. For these donors-recipients couples, PIRCHE-II numbers were related to graft survival in univariate and multivariable analyses. Adjusted for confounders, the natural logarithm of PIRCHE-II was associated with a higher risk for graft failure [hazard ratio (HR): 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23, p = 0.003]. When analyzing a subgroup of patients who had their first transplantation, the HR of graft failure for ln(PIRCHE-II) was higher compared with the overall cohort (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.34, p < 0.001). PIRCHE-II demonstrated both early and late effects on graft failure in this subgroup. These data suggest that the PIRCHE-II may impact graft survival after kidney transplantation. Inclusion of PIRCHE-II in donor-selection criteria may eventually lead to an improved kidney graft survival.
| S-EPMC5844930 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundArteriovenous (AV) fistulas are considered the gold standard for ensuring safe and long-term vascular access in patients with haemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease. However, previous studies demonstrated that high-flow AV fistulas might add additional cardiovascular burden in the post-transplant setting, leading to frequent fistula closure in this population. Currently, there is no consensus regarding management of high-flow fistulas in post-transplant patients with stable kidney function. The present randomized controlled trial examines the effect of prophylactic AV fistula closure on high-output heart failure.MethodsTwenty-eight kidney transplant patients with stable graft function, absence of pre-existing severe cardiac failure, and brachial arterial flow rate of at least 1,500 mL/min were recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention and control group, respectively. The intervention group was subject to immediate fistula ligature. Patients within the control group were referred to fistula ligature only if the main study endpoint high-output heart failure was reached. The latter was defined by the presence of at least 1 clinical sign (i.e., worsening NYHA score) and at least 2 of the following echocardiographic parameters: diameter of right atrium (major) >53 mm, right atrium (minor) >44 mm, inferior vena cava ≥21 mm, right pulmonary artery >20 mm, TAPSE <16 mm, systolic pulmonal artery pressure >40 mm Hg, and/or left ventricular eccentricity index <1. During a 24-month follow-up period, quarterly measurements of kidney function, NT-proBNP, and lactate dehydrogenase as well as a biannual echocardiographic check-up were performed.ResultsHigh-output heart failure attributable to high-flow fistula was reported in 5 of 13 control patients (38.5%), whereas no patient in the intervention group presented with clinical and echocardiographic signs of high-output heart failure during the follow-up period. Thus, prophylactic ligature of high-flow fistulas avoided high-output heart failure in our patient population (p = 0.013). Three patients in the control group, however, had to undergo fistula ligature due to aneurysm formation (n = 2) and steal phenomenon (n = 1). Median NT-proBNP levels decreased from 317 ng/L pre-ligature to 223 ng/L post-ligature (p = 0.003). Serum creatinine levels did not significantly differ before and after AV fistula ligature (1.69 vs. 1.60 mg/dL, respectively, p = 0.059). Improvement of echocardiographic findings (e.g., a decrease in systolic pulmonary arterial pressure) was found in 7 of 8 ligature patients but did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionProphylactic ligature of high-flow AV fistulas after kidney transplantation can avoid high-output heart failure, and a more liberal approach to close AV fistulas might be justified.
| S-EPMC7592949 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There are no established regulations governing patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplantation, creating the potential for significant center-level variations in clinical practice.MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) file, we examined practice trends and variations in patient selection for SHK at the center level between January 1, 2004 and March 31, 2019.ResultsOverall, SHK is becoming more common with most centers performing heart transplants also performing SHK. Among patients who underwent heart transplant who were receiving dialysis, the rate of SHK varied from 22% to 86% at the center level. Among patients not on dialysis, the median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of patients receiving SHK varied between 19 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 . When adjusting for other factors, the odds of SHK varied 57-fold between the highest and lowest SHK performing centers.ConclusionVariation in SHK at the center level suggests the need for national guidelines around the selection of patients for SHK.
| S-EPMC10067274 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7879118 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The sequence of graft implantation in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) warrants additional study and more targeted focus, since little is known about the short- and long-term effects on the outcome and graft survival after transplantation. 103 patients receiving SPKT in our department between 1999 and 2015 were included in the study. Patients were divided according to the sequence of graft implantation into pancreas-first (PF, n = 61) and kidney-first (KF, n = 42) groups. Clinicopathological characteristics, outcome and survival were reviewed retrospectively. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar. Rates of post-operative complications and graft dysfunction were significantly higher in the PF group compared with the KF group (episodes of acute rejection within the first year after SPKT: 11 (18%) versus 2 (4.8%); graft pancreatitis: 18 (18%) versus 2 (4.8%), p = 0.04; vascular thrombosis of the pancreas: 9 (14.8%) versus 1 (2.4%), p = 0.03; and delayed graft function of the kidney: 12 (19.6%) versus 2 (4.8%), p = 0.019). The three-month pancreas graft survival was significantly higher in the KF group (PF: 77% versus KF: 92.1%; p = 0.037). No significant difference was observed in pancreas graft survival five years after transplantation (PF: 71.6% versus KF: 84.8%; p = 0.104). Kidney graft survival was similar between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed order of graft implantation as an independent prognostic factor for graft survival three months after SPKT (HR 2.6, 1.3-17.1, p = 0.026) and five years (HR 3.7, 2.1-23.4, p = 0.040). Our data indicates that implantation of the pancreas prior to the kidney during SPKT has an influence especially on the early-post-operative outcome and survival rate of pancreas grafts.
| S-EPMC8070486 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is a lack of information regarding which is the best dialysis technique after kidney transplant (KT) failure. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of kidney replacement therapy modality-peritoneal dialysis (TX-PD-TX), haemodialysis (TX-HD-TX) and preemptive deceased donor retransplantation (TX-TX) on patient survival and second KT outcomes.MethodsA retrospective observational study from the Catalan Renal Registry was carried out. We included adult patients with failing of their first KT from 2000 to 2018.ResultsAmong 2045 patients, 1829 started on HD (89.4%), 168 on PD (8.2%) and 48 (2.4%) received a preemptive KT. Non-inclusion on the KT waiting list and HD were associated with worse patient survival. For patients included on the waiting list, the probability of human leucocyte antigens (HLA) sensitization and to receive a second KT was similar in HD and PD. A total of 776 patients received a second KT (38%), 656 in TX-HD-TX, 72 in TX-PD-TX and 48 in TX-TX groups. Adjusted mortality after second KT was higher in TX-HD-TX patients compared with TX-TX and TX-PD-TX groups, without differences between TX-TX and TX-PD-TX groups. Death-censored second graft survival was similar in all three groups.ConclusionsOur results suggest that after first KT failure, PD is superior to HD in reducing mortality in candidates for a second KT without options for preemptive retransplantation.
| S-EPMC9613432 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about the time-varying determinants of kidney graft failure in children.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of primary pediatric kidney transplant recipients (younger than 18 years) from the Eurotransplant registry (1990-2020). Piece-wise exponential additive mixed models were applied to analyze time-varying recipient, donor, and transplant risk factors. Primary outcome was death-censored graft failure.ResultsWe report on 4528 kidney transplantations, of which 68% with deceased and 32% with living donor. One thousand six hundred and thirty-eight recipients experienced graft failure, and 168 died with a functioning graft. Between 2011 and 2020, the 5-year graft failure risk was 10% for deceased donor and 4% for living donor kidney transplant recipients. Risk of graft failure decreased five-fold from 1990 to 2020. The association between living donor transplantation and the lower risk of graft failure was strongest in the first month post-transplant (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.73) and remained statistically significant until 12 years post-transplant. Risk factors for graft failure in the first 2 years were deceased donor younger than 12 years or older than 46 years, potentially recurrent kidney disease, and panel-reactive antibody >0%. Other determinants of graft failure included dialysis before transplantation (until 5 years post-transplant), human leukocyte antigen mismatch 2-4 (0-15 years post-transplant), human leukocyte antigen mismatch 5-6 (2-12 years post-transplant), and hemodialysis (8-14 years post-transplant). Recipients older than 11 years at transplantation had a higher risk of graft failure 1-8 years post-transplant compared with other age groups, whereas young recipients had a lower risk throughout follow-up. Analysis of the combined effect of post-transplant time and recipient age showed a higher rate of graft failure during the first 5 years post-transplant in adolescents compared with young transplant recipients. In contrast to deceased donor younger than 12 years, deceased donor older than 46 years was consistently associated with a higher graft failure risk.ConclusionsWe report a long-term inverse association between living donor kidney transplantation and the risk of graft failure. The determinants of graft failure varied with time. There was a significant cumulative effect of adolescence and time post-transplant. The ideal donor age window was dependent on time post-transplant.
| S-EPMC10937011 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBiopsy of a transplanted pancreas is sometimes necessary in patients who have undergone simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation and have elevated serum lipase and amylase concentrations. However, the risks associated with pancreatic graft biopsy are high, and the best biopsy technique for different location of pancreatic graft remains unclear.MethodsDepending on the anatomical location of the transplanted pancreas, percutaneous computed tomography (CT) combined with color Doppler-guided puncture biopsy or laparoscopic biopsy was used to obtain samples of transplanted pancreatic tissue that were shallow and deep, respectively.ResultsAfter SPK transplantation, 4 patients developed abnormal serum lipase and amylase concentrations and underwent pancreas graft biopsy, 1 patient underwent percutaneous CT combined with color Doppler-guided puncture biopsy, 2 patients underwent laparoscopic wedge biopsy, and 1 patient underwent laparoscopic and puncture biopsy. All biopsies were performed successfully, with no intra- or postoperative complications (e.g., bleeding, pancreatic leakage, intestinal leakage). Biopsy sampling was effective in 3 patients, including 1 case of acute pancreatic rejection, 1 case of pancreatitis, and 1 case of pancreatic plasmablastic lymphoma. Biopsy failed to retrieve samples in 1 patient with a deep pancreatic graft who underwent laparoscopic wedge biopsy.ConclusionsPancreas graft biopsy is safe and feasible after SPK transplantation. In addition to the two biopsy methods mentioned, other methods can also be used. Different biopsy strategies should be formulated according to the anatomical location of the transplanted pancreas.
| S-EPMC10086771 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPancreas graft status in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKTx) is currently assessed by nonspecific biochemical markers, typically amylase or lipase. Identifying a noninvasive biomarker with good sensitivity in detecting early pancreas graft rejection could improve SPKTx management.MethodsHere, we developed a pilot study to explore donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) performance in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection (P-BPAR) of the pancreas graft in a cohort of 36 SPKTx recipients with biopsy-matched plasma samples. dd-cfDNA was measured using the Prospera test (Natera, Inc.) and reported both as a fraction of the total cfDNA (fraction; %) and as concentration in the recipient's plasma (quantity; copies/mL).ResultsIn the absence of P-BPAR, dd-cfDNA was significantly higher in samples collected within the first 45 d after SPKTx compared with those measured afterward (median, 1.00% versus 0.30%; median, 128.2 versus 35.3 cp/mL, respectively with both; P = 0.001). In samples obtained beyond day 45, P-BPAR samples presented a significantly higher dd-cfDNA fraction (0.83 versus 0.30%; P = 0.006) and quantity (81.3 versus 35.3 cp/mL; P = 0.001) than stable samples. Incorporating dd-cfDNA quantity along with dd-cfDNA fraction outperformed dd-cfDNA fraction alone to detect active rejection. Notably, when using a quantity cutoff of 70 cp/mL, dd-cfDNA detected P-BPAR with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 93.7%, which was more accurate than current biomarkers (area under curve of 0.89 for dd-cfDNA (cp/ml) compared with 0.74 of lipase and 0.46 for amylase).Conclusionsdd-cfDNA measurement through a simple noninvasive blood test could be incorporated into clinical practice to help inform graft management in SPKTx patients.
| S-EPMC9311279 | biostudies-literature