Dataset Information

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose of review

Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management.

Recent findings

Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a multiparameter based risk assessment tool, or as an individual biomarker taking relevant confounders into account. A novel Luminex-based CXCL10 assay has been validated in a multicenter study, and proved to be robust, reproducible, and accurate.

Summary

Urine CXCL10 is a well characterized inflammation biomarker, which can be used to guide performance of surveillance biopsies. Wide implementation into clinical practice depends on the availability of inexpensive, thoroughly validated assays with approval from regulatory authorities.

SUBMITTER: Hirt-Minkowski P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10919271 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation.

Hirt-Minkowski Patricia P Schaub Stefan S

Current opinion in organ transplantation 20240119 2

<h4>Purpose of review</h4>Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management.<h4>Recent findings</h4>Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a mul ...[more]

PMID: 38235748

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionSubclinical inflammation is an important predictor of death-censored graft loss, and its treatment has been shown to improve graft outcomes. Urine CXCL10 outperforms standard post-transplant surveillance in observational studies, by detecting subclinical rejection and early clinical rejection before graft functional decline in kidney transplant recipients.Methods and analysisThis is a phase ii/iii multicentre, international randomised controlled parallel group trial to determine if the early treatment of rejection, as detected by urine CXCL10, will improve kidney allograft outcomes. Incident adult kidney transplant patients (n~420) will be enrolled to undergo routine urine CXCL10 monitoring postkidney transplant. Patients at high risk of rejection, defined as confirmed elevated urine CXCL10 level, will be randomised 1:1 stratified by centre (n=250). The intervention arm (n=125) will undergo a study biopsy to check for subclinical rejection and biopsy-proven rejection will be treated per protocol. The control arm (n=125) will undergo routine post-transplant monitoring. The primary outcome at 12 months is a composite of death-censored graft loss, clinical biopsy-proven acute rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody, inflammation in areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (Banff i-IFTA, chronic active T-cell mediated rejection) and subclinical tubulitis on 12-month surveillance biopsy. The secondary outcomes include decline of graft function, microvascular inflammation at 12 months, development of IFTA at 12 months, days from transplantation to clinical biopsy-proven rejection, albuminuria, EuroQol five-dimension five-level instrument, cost-effectiveness analysis of the urine CXCL10 monitoring strategy and the urine CXCL10 kinetics in response to rejection therapy.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (HS20861, B2017:076) and the local research ethics boards of participating centres. Recruitment commenced in March 2018 and results are expected to be published in 2023. De-identified data may be shared with other researchers according to international guidelines (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [ICJME]).Trial registration numberNCT03206801; Pre-results.

Project description:Background and objectivesUromodulin, produced exclusively in the kidney's thick ascending limb, is a biomarker of kidney tubular health. However, the relationship between urine uromodulin and histologic changes in the kidney tubulointerstitium has not been characterized. In this study, we test the association of urine uromodulin with kidney histologic findings in humans and mice.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe investigated the independent association of urine uromodulin measured at the time of kidney biopsy with histologic features in 364 participants at two academic medical centers from 2015 to 2018 using multivariable linear regression models. This relationship was further examined by comparison of uromodulin staining in murine models of kidney fibrosis and repair.ResultsWe found urine uromodulin to be correlated with serum creatinine (rho=-0.43; P<0.001), bicarbonate (0.20; P<0.001), and hemoglobin (0.11; P=0.03) at the time of biopsy but not with urine albumin (-0.07; P=0.34). Multivariable models controlling for prebiopsy GFR, serum creatinine at biopsy, and urine albumin showed higher uromodulin to be associated with lower severity of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and glomerulosclerosis (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy: -3.5% [95% confidence intervals, -5.7% to -1.2%] and glomerulosclerosis: -3.3% [95% confidence intervals, -5.9% to -0.6%] per two-fold difference in uromodulin). However, when both interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and glomerulosclerosis were included in multivariable analysis, only interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy was independently associated with uromodulin (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy: -2.5% [95% confidence intervals, -4.6% to -0.4%] and glomerulosclerosis: -0.9% [95% confidence intervals, -3.4% to 1.5%] per two-fold difference in uromodulin). In mouse kidneys, uromodulin staining was found to be lower in the fibrotic model than in normal or repaired models.ConclusionsHigher urine uromodulin is independently associated with lower tubulointerstitial fibrosis in both human kidney biopsies and a mouse model of fibrosis.PodcastThis article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2022_08_10_CJN04360422.mp3.

Project description:BackgroundNew renal biomarkers measured in urine promise to increase specificity for risk stratification and early diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) but concomitantly may be altered by urine concentration effects and chronic renal insufficiency. This study therefore directly compared the performance of AKI biomarkers in urine and plasma.MethodsThis single-center, prospective cohort study included 110 unselected adults undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2009 and 2010. Plasma and/or urine concentrations of creatinine, cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM1), and albumin as well as 15 additional biomarkers in plasma and urine were measured during the perioperative period. The primary outcome was AKI defined by AKIN serum creatinine criteria within 72 hours after surgery.ResultsBiomarkers in plasma showed markedly better discriminative performance for preoperative risk stratification and early postoperative (within 24h after surgery) detection of AKI than urine biomarkers. Discriminative power of urine biomarkers improved when concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine, but urine biomarkers had still lower AUC values than plasma biomarkers. Best diagnostic performance 4h after surgery had plasma NGAL (AUC 0.83), cystatin C (0.76), MIG (0.74), and L-FAPB (0.73). Combinations of multiple biomarkers did not improve their diagnostic power. Preoperative clinical scoring systems (EuroSCORE and Cleveland Clinic Foundation Score) predicted the risk for AKI (AUC 0.76 and 0.71) and were not inferior to biomarkers. Preexisting chronic kidney disease limited the diagnostic performance of both plasma and urine biomarkers.ConclusionsIn our cohort plasma biomarkers had higher discriminative power for risk stratification and early diagnosis of AKI than urine biomarkers. For preoperative risk stratification of AKI clinical models showed similar discriminative performance to biomarkers. The discriminative performance of both plasma and urine biomarkers was reduced by preexisting chronic kidney disease.

Dataset Information

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation.

Purpose of review

Recent findings

Summary

Publications

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets