Predictors of improvement in left ventricular systolic function after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhao X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC10960375 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) can improve after catheter ablation (CA) in many patients with AF. However, prospective prediction of response can be challenging. The aim of this study was, therefore, to perform a systematic literature review of features associated with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with AF and LVSD undergoing first CA.MethodSystematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to 24 January 2024, for studies involving adult patients with LVSD receiving treatment for AF. The focus was on research articles and clinical trials reporting features associated with changes in LVEF following CA. The review followed PRISMA guidelines.ResultsA total of 789 unique articles were reviewed and 20 were included in the systematic review. Sixty-nine per cent (range, 54-79%) of included patients met the criteria for responder status, which were based on LVEF improvement (usually an increase in LVEF >10% or to >50% at follow-up). Baseline surrogates of myocardial fibrosis on MRI (R2=-0.67), electroanatomical mapping (R2=-0.93) and biochemical surrogates have shown the strongest association with LVEF change. Left atrium and LV chamber size, diastolic dysfunction ECGbased parameters and a known heart failure aetiology have shown prognostic value independently and in combination.DiscussionImaging, clinical and ECG-based surrogates of LV fibrosis may be pre-CA markers of LVEF improvement in patients with AF and LVSD. However, the confounding effect of procedural outcomes should be considered. A composite risk stratification tool would have clinical utility in risk stratification and patient selection; however, prospective studies are needed.
| S-EPMC11865674 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of catheter ablation vs. direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and to define baseline features of patients that will get more benefit from ablation.MethodsFrom July 2013 to October 2014, 97 consecutive single-center patients with persistent AF and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%) underwent DCC followed by amiodarone (n = 40) or circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI; n = 57) according to patient's preference were recruited in the study. Post-ablation recurrence was treated with atrial roof and mitral isthmus lines ablation with or without PVI based on restoration or not of pulmonary vein (PV) potential conduction. Study outcomes were 12-month rate of sustained sinus rhythm (SR) and cardiac function. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with and without cardiac function improvement post ablation.ResultsWith similarly distributed characteristics at baseline, ablation (mean 1.8 procedures) relative to DCC yielded significantly higher level of 12-month SR maintenance rate (68.42% vs. 35%, P = 0.001); and better LVEF and New York Heart Association class. with significant effect for DCC only in maintained SR cases. Post ablation LVEF increased (>20% or to over 55%) in 31 (54.39%) patients with worse baseline cardiac function and ventricular rate control.ConclusionsCatheter ablation relative to cardioversion of persistent AF with symptomatic heart failure yielded better 12-month SR maintenance and cardiac function. Compared with non-responders, patients with improved LVEF post-ablation had poorer ventricular rate control and cardiac function at baseline, suggesting a significant component of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy in this group.
| S-EPMC5370131 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCatheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients reduced the mortality but may increase complications and raise the safety concern.HypothesisCA for AF in HF patients may not increase the complications vs medical treatment, and it may reduce hospitalizations and mortality and improve heart function.MethodsThree groups of AF patients were included in the study: 120 congestive HF for their first CA (AFHF-CA), 150 congestive HF who were undergoing medical therapy (AFHF-Med), and 150 patients with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) (AF-CA).ResultsAfter 30 ± 6 months of follow up, 45.8% of patients in the AFHF-CA and 61.3% of patients in the AF-CA groups maintained sinus rhythm (SR) in comparison with 2.7% in AFHF-Med (P < .01). Hospitalization for HF was significantly lower in AFHF-CA than in AFHF-Med groups (P < .01). Death occurred in 7.5% of patients in the AFHF-CA group, which was lower than 18% in the AFHF-Med group (P < .01). Significant improvements in heart function were shown in the AFHF-CA group compared to the AFHF-Med group, including LVEF (P < .01), LV end-diastolic diameter (P < .01), and New York Heart Association classification (P < .01), as well as the left atrial diameter (P < .01). AFHF-CA patients required additional ablation more often (P < .05). CA had a better prognosis in paroxysmal AF and tachycardia-related diseases.ConclusionCA for AF reduced hospitalizations and mortality and improved heart function, vs medical treatment, and was as safe as CA in those with normal heart function.
| S-EPMC7068063 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Combined 'hybrid' thoracoscopic and percutaneous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a strategy used to treat AF in patients with therapy-resistant symptomatic AF. We aimed to study efficacy and safety of single-stage hybrid AF ablation in patients with symptomatic persistent AF, or paroxysmal AF with failed endocardial ablation, and assess determinants of success and quality of life. METHODS:We included consecutive patients undergoing single-stage hybrid AF ablation. First, we performed epicardial ablation, via thoracoscopic access, to isolate the pulmonary veins and superior caval vein and to create a posterior left atrial box. Thereafter, isolation was assessed endocardially and complementary endocardial ablation was performed, followed by cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Efficacy was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiography and 72-hour Holter monitoring after 3, 6 and 12 months. Recurrence was defined as AF/atrial flutter/tachycardia recorded by electrocardiography or Holter monitoring lasting >30 s during 1‑year follow-up. RESULTS:Fifty patients were included, 57 ± 9 years, 38 (76%) men, 5 (10%) paroxysmal, 34 (68%) persistent and 11 (22%) long-standing persistent AF. At 1‑year 38 (76%) maintained sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic drugs. Majority of recurrences were atrial flutter (9/12 patients). Success was associated with type of AF (p = 0.039). Patients with paroxysmal AF had highest success, patients with longstanding persistent AF had lowest success. Seven (14%) patients had procedure-related complications. Quality of life improved after ablation in patients who maintained sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION:Success of single-stage hybrid AF ablation was 76% off antiarrhythmic drugs, being associated with type of AF. Quality of life improved significantly, Procedure-related complications occurred in 14%.
| S-EPMC6393682 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLeft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent predictor of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Whether LVH can predict the recurrence of arrhythmia after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains unclear.HypothesisPAF patients with baseline-electrocardiographic LVH has a higher recurrence rate after RFCA procedure compared with those without LVH.MethodsA total of 436 patients with PAF undergoing first RFCA were consecutively enrolled and clustered into 2 groups based on electrocardiogram (ECG) findings: non-ECG LVH (218 patients) and ECG LVH (218 patients). LVH was characterized by the Romhilt-Estes point score system; the score ≥5points were defined as LVH.ResultsAt 42 months' (interquartile range, 18.0-60.0 months) follow-up after RFCA, 151 (69.3%) patients in the non-ECG LVH group and 108 (49.5%) patients in the ECG LVH group maintained sinus rhythm without using antiarrhythmic drugs (P < 0.001). Patients with ECG LVH tended to experience a much higher prevalence of stroke and recurrence of atrial arrhythmia episodes compared with those without ECG LVH (log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis found the presence of ECG LVH and left atrial diameter to be independent risk factors for recurrence after adjusting for confounding factors.ConclusionsThe presence of ECG LVH was a strong and independent predictor of recurrence in patients with PAF following RFCA.
| S-EPMC6490114 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) may reflect a subclinical cardiomyopathy that persists after sinus rhythm (SR) restoration, providing a substrate for AF recurrence. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of restoring SR by catheter ablation on left ventricular (LV) function and energetics in patients with AF but no significant comorbidities. METHODS:Fifty-three patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF and without significant valvular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, coronary artery disease, uncontrolled thyroid disease, systemic inflammatory disease, diabetes mellitus, or obstructive sleep apnea (ie, lone AF) undergoing ablation and 25 matched control subjects in SR were investigated. Magnetic resonance imaging quantified LV ejection fraction (LVEF), peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS), and left atrial volumes and function, whereas phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy evaluated ventricular energetics (ratio of phosphocreatine to ATP). AF burden was determined before and after ablation by 7-day Holter monitoring; intermittent ECG event monitoring was also undertaken after ablation to investigate for asymptomatic AF recurrence. RESULTS:Before ablation, both LV function and energetics were significantly impaired in patients compared with control subjects (LVEF, 61% [interquartile range (IQR), 52%-65%] versus 71% [IQR, 69%-73%], P<0.001; PSCS, -15% [IQR, -11 to -18%] versus -18% [IQR, -17% to -19%], P=0.002; ratio of phosphocreatine to ATP, 1.81±0.35 versus 2.05±0.29, P=0.004). As expected, patients also had dilated and impaired left atria compared with control subjects (all P<0.001). Early after ablation (1-4 days), LVEF and PSCS improved in patients recovering SR from AF (LVEF, 7.0±10%, P=0.005; PSCS, -3.5±4.3%, P=0.001) but were unchanged in those in SR during both assessments (both P=NS). At 6 to 9 months after ablation, AF burden reduced significantly (from 54% [IQR, 1.5%-100%] to 0% [IQR 0%-0.1%]; P<0.001). However, LVEF and PSCS did not improve further (both P=NS) and remained impaired compared with control subjects (P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant improvement in atrial function from before ablation (P=NS), and this remained lower than in control subjects (P<0.001). The ratio of phosphocreatine to ATP was unaffected by heart rhythm during assessment and AF burden before ablation (both P=NS). It was unchanged after ablation (P=0.57), remaining lower than in control subjects regardless of both recovery of SR and freedom from recurrent AF (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with lone AF have impaired myocardial energetics and subtle LV dysfunction, which do not normalize after ablation. These findings suggest that AF may be the consequence (rather than the cause) of an occult cardiomyopathy, which persists despite a significant reduction in AF burden after ablation.
| S-EPMC5054971 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7749215 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: It is unclear whether atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (AFCA) improves the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. We evaluated the 1-year change in the H2FPEF score, which reflects the degree of LV diastolic function, after AFCA among patients with a normal LV systolic function. Methods and Results: We included 1,471 patients (30.7% female, median age 60 years, paroxysmal-type AF 68.6%) who had available H2FPEF scores at baseline and at 1-year after AFCA to evaluate the 1-year change in the H2FPEF score (ΔH2FPEF score[1-yr]) after AFCA. Baseline high H2FPEF scores (≥6) were independently associated with the female sex, left atrium (LA) diameter, LV mass index, pericardial fat volume, and a low estimated glomerular filtration rate. One year after AFCA, decreased ΔH2FPEF scores[1-yr] were associated with baseline H2FPEF scores of ≥6 [OR, 4.19 (95% CI, 2.88-6.11), p < 0.001], no diabetes [OR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37-0.98), p = 0.04], and lower pericardial fat volume [OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00), p = 0.003]. Increased ΔH2FPEF scores[1-yr] were associated with a baseline H2FPEF score of <6 [OR, 3.54 (95% CI, 2.08-6.04), p < 0.001] and sustained AF after a recurrence within 1 year [SustainAF[1-yr]; OR, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.01-3.54), p = 0.048]. Throughout a 56-month median follow-up, an increased ΔH2FPEF score[1-yr] resulted in a poorer rhythm outcome of AFCA (at 1 year, log-rank p = 0.003; long-term, log-rank p = 0.010). Conclusions: AFCA appears to improve LV diastolic dysfunction. However, SustainAF[1-yr] may contribute to worsening LV diastolic dysfunction, and it was shown by increased ΔH2FPEF scores[1-yr], which was independently associated with higher risk of AF recurrence rate after AFCA. Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02138695.
| S-EPMC8369029 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCatheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be technically challenging due to difficulty with catheter positioning in the left ventricle (LV) and achieving stable contact. The Hansen Sensei Robotic system (HRS) has been used in atrial fibrillation but its utility in VT is unclear.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the technical feasibility of robotic catheter ablation of LV ventricular tachycardia (VT) using the HRS.MethodsTwenty-three patients underwent LV VT mapping and ablation with the HRS via a transseptal, transmitral valve approach. Nineteen patients underwent substrate mapping and ablation (18 had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 1 had an apical variant of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). Four patients had focal VT requiring LV VT mapping and ablation. Procedural endpoints included substrate modification by endocardial scar border ablation and elimination of late potentials, or elimination of inducible focal VT.ResultsMapping and ablation were entirely robotic without requiring manual catheter manipulation in all patients and reaching all LV regions with stable contact. Fluoroscopy time of the LV procedure was 22.2 ± 11.2 minutes. Radiofrequency time was 33 ± 21 minutes. Total procedural times were 231 ± 76 minutes. Complications included a left groin hematoma (opposite to the HRS sheath), 1 pericardial effusion without tamponade that was drained successfully, and transient right ventricular failure in a patient with previous left ventricular assist device. At 13.4 ± 6.7 months of follow-up (range 1-19 months), recurrence of VT occurred in 3 of 23 patients.ConclusionOur initial experience suggests that the HRS allows successful mapping and ablation of LV VT.
| S-EPMC3298677 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceCatheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has shown limited success.ObjectiveTo determine whether AF drivers could be accurately identified by periodicity and similarity (PRISM) mapping ablation results for persistent AF when added to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective randomized clinical trial was performed between June 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, and included patients with persistent AF enrolled in 3 centers across Asia. Data were analyzed on October 1, 2022.InterventionPatients were assigned to the PRISM-guided approach (group 1) or the conventional approach (group 2) at a 1:1 ratio.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was freedom from AF or other atrial arrhythmia for longer than 30 seconds at 6 and 12 months.ResultsA total of 170 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.0 [12.3] years; 136 men [80.0%]) were enrolled (85 patients in group 1 and 85 patients in group 2). More group 1 patients achieved freedom from AF at 12 months compared with group 2 patients (60 [70.6%] vs 40 [47.1%]). Multivariate analysis indicated that the PRISM-guided approach was associated with freedom from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.33-0.85]).Conclusions and relevanceThe waveform similarity and recurrence pattern derived from high-density mapping might provide an improved guiding approach for ablation of persistent AF. Compared with the conventional procedure, this novel specific substrate ablation strategy reduced the frequency of recurrent AF and increased the likelihood of maintenance of sinus rhythm.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05333952.
| S-EPMC10665974 | biostudies-literature