Dataset Information

A comparison of arterial spin labelling with catheter angiography in evaluating arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To compare the performance of arterial spin labelling (ASL) in evaluating arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) against the current gold standard of catheter angiography.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the published literature using EMBASE and Medline. We included studies that compared ASL to catheter angiography in the assessment of AVMs in three outcome domains: detection, angioarchitectural and haemodynamic features.

Results

From 314 unique citations, 19 studies representing 289 patients with intracranial AVMs met our inclusion criteria. We did not pool data due to marked heterogeneity in study outcome measures. Seven studies showed high diagnostic performance of ASL in identifying arterial feeders, with sensitivity ranging from 84.6 to 100% and specificity ranging from 93.3 to 100%. Six studies showed strong ability in detecting arteriovenous shunting, with sensitivity ranging from 91.7 to 100% and specificity ranging from 90 to 100%. Seven studies demonstrated that ASL could identify nidal location and size as well as catheter angiography, while five studies showed relatively poorer performance in delineating venous drainage. Two studies showed 100% sensitivity of ASL in the identification of residual or obliterated AVMs following stereotactic radiosurgery.

Conclusions

Despite limitations in the current evidence base and technical challenges, this review suggests that ASL has a promising role in the work-up and post-treatment follow-up of AVMs. Larger scale prospective studies assessing the diagnostic performance of ASL are warranted.

Advances in knowledge

ASL demonstrates overall validity in the evaluation of intracranial AVMs.

SUBMITTER: Ramachandran S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10993222 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparison of arterial spin labelling with catheter angiography in evaluating arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.

Ramachandran Sanjeev S Mukherjee Deyashini D Delf Jonathan J Bown Matthew James MJ Kandiyil Neghal N

The British journal of radiology 20200325 1110

<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the performance of arterial spin labelling (ASL) in evaluating arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) against the current gold standard of catheter angiography.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically reviewed the published literature using EMBASE and Medline. We included studies that compared ASL to catheter angiography in the assessment of AVMs in three outcome domains: detection, angioarchitectural and haemodynamic features.<h4>Results</h4>From 314 unique citations, 19 stud ...[more]

PMID: 32208976

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and purposeMicro-arteriovenous malformations are an underrecognized etiology of intracranial hemorrhage. Our study aimed to assess the adjunctive efficacy of intra-arterial conebeam CTA relative to DSA in the diagnosis and surgical planning of intracranial micro-AVMs.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective study of all micro-AVMs (≤1-cm nidus) at our institution. Blinded neuroradiologists qualitatively graded DSA and intra-arterial conebeam CTA images for the detection of specific micro-AVM anatomic parameters (arterial feeder, micronidus, and venous drainer) and defined an overall diagnostic value. Statistical and absolute differences in the overall diagnostic values defined the relative intra-arterial conebeam CTA diagnostic values, respectively. Blinded neurosurgeons reported their treatment approach after DSA and graded the adjunctive value of intra-arterial conebeam CTA to improve or modify treatment. Intra-arterial conebeam CTA efficacy was defined as interobserver agreement in the relative intra-arterial conebeam CTA diagnostic and/or treatment-planning value scores.ResultsTen patients with micro-AVMs presented with neurologic deficits and/or intracranial hemorrhages. Both neuroradiologists assigned a higher overall intra-arterial conebeam CTA diagnostic value (P < .05), secondary to improved evaluation of both arterial feeders and the micronidus, with good interobserver agreement (τ = 0.66, P = .018) in the relative intra-arterial conebeam CTA diagnostic value. Both neurosurgeons reported that integrating the intra-arterial conebeam CTA data into their treatment plan would allow more confident localization for surgical/radiation treatment (8/10; altering the treatment plan in 1 patient), with good interobserver agreement in the relative intra-arterial conebeam CTA treatment planning value (τ = 0.73, P = .025).ConclusionsAdjunctive intra-arterial conebeam CTA techniques are more effective in the diagnostic identification and anatomic delineation of micro-AVMs, relative to DSA alone, with the potential to improve microsurgical or radiosurgery treatment planning.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI are valuable tools for measuring the cellular and vascular properties of brain tumours. This has been well studied in adult patients, however, the biological features of childhood brain tumours are unique, and paediatric-focused studies are less common. We aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) values derived from arterial spin labelling (ASL) in paediatric brain tumours. METHODS:We performed a meta-analysis of published studies reporting ADC and ASL-derived CBF values in paediatric brain tumours. Data were combined using a random effects model in order to define typical parameter ranges for different histological tumour subtypes and WHO grades. New data were also acquired in a 'validation cohort' at our institution, in which ADC and CBF values in treatment naïve paediatric brain tumour patients were measured, in order to test the validity of the findings from the literature in an un-seen cohort. ADC and CBF quantification was performed by two radiologists via manual placement of tumour regions of interest (ROIs), in addition to an automated approach to tumour ROI placement. RESULTS:A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis, constituting data acquired in 542 paediatric patients. Parameters of interest were based on measurements from ROIs placed within the tumour, including mean and minimum ADC values (ADCROI-mean, ADCROI-min) and the maximum CBF value normalised to grey matter (nCBFROI-max). After combination of the literature data, a number of histological tumour subtype groups showed significant differences in ADC values, which were confirmed, where possible, in our validation cohort of 32 patients. In both the meta-analysis and our cohort, diffuse midline glioma was found to be an outlier among high-grade tumour subtypes, with ADC and CBF values more similar to the low-grade tumours. After grouping patients by WHO grade, significant differences in grade groups were found in ADCROI-mean, ADCROI-min, and nCBFROI-max, in both the meta-analysis and our validation cohort. After excluding diffuse midline glioma, optimum thresholds (derived from ROC analysis) for separating low/high-grade tumours were 0.95 × 10-3 mm2/s (ADCROI-mean), 0.82 × 10-3 mm2/s (ADCROI-min) and 1.45 (nCBFROI-max). These thresholds were able to identify low/high-grade tumours with 96%, 83%, and 83% accuracy respectively in our validation cohort, and agreed well with the results from the meta-analysis. Diagnostic power was improved by combining ADC and CBF measurements from the same tumour, after which 100% of tumours in our cohort were correctly classified as either low- or high-grade (excluding diffuse midline glioma). CONCLUSION:ADC and CBF values are useful for differentiating certain histological subtypes, and separating low- and high-grade paediatric brain tumours. The threshold values presented here are in agreement with previously published studies, as well as a new patient cohort. If ADC and CBF values acquired in the same tumour are combined, the diagnostic accuracy is optimised.

Dataset Information

A comparison of arterial spin labelling with catheter angiography in evaluating arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Advances in knowledge

Publications

A comparison of arterial spin labelling with catheter angiography in evaluating arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets