Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A systematic review of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults: comparison between models based on research cohorts and models based on routinely collected data.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Prediction models can identify fall-prone individuals. Prediction models can be based on either data from research cohorts (cohort-based) or routinely collected data (RCD-based). We review and compare cohort-based and RCD-based studies describing the development and/or validation of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

Medline and Embase were searched via Ovid until January 2023. We included studies describing the development or validation of multivariable prediction models of falls in older adults (60+). Both risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed using the PROBAST and TRIPOD, respectively.

Results

We included and reviewed 28 relevant studies, describing 30 prediction models (23 cohort-based and 7 RCD-based), and external validation of two existing models (one cohort-based and one RCD-based). The median sample sizes for cohort-based and RCD-based studies were 1365 [interquartile range (IQR) 426-2766] versus 90 441 (IQR 56 442-128 157), and the ranges of fall rates were 5.4% to 60.4% versus 1.6% to 13.1%, respectively. Discrimination performance was comparable between cohort-based and RCD-based models, with the respective area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.65 to 0.88 versus 0.71 to 0.81. The median number of predictors in cohort-based final models was 6 (IQR 5-11); for RCD-based models, it was 16 (IQR 11-26). All but one cohort-based model had high bias risks, primarily due to deficiencies in statistical analysis and outcome determination.

Conclusions

Cohort-based models to predict falls in older adults in the community are plentiful. RCD-based models are yet in their infancy but provide comparable predictive performance with no additional data collection efforts. Future studies should focus on methodological and reporting quality.

SUBMITTER: Dormosh N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11231951 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A systematic review of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults: comparison between models based on research cohorts and models based on routinely collected data.

Dormosh Noman N   van de Loo Bob B   Heymans Martijn W MW   Schut Martijn C MC   Medlock Stephanie S   van Schoor Natasja M NM   van der Velde Nathalie N   Abu-Hanna Ameen A  

Age and ageing 20240701 7


<h4>Background</h4>Prediction models can identify fall-prone individuals. Prediction models can be based on either data from research cohorts (cohort-based) or routinely collected data (RCD-based). We review and compare cohort-based and RCD-based studies describing the development and/or validation of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults.<h4>Methods</h4>Medline and Embase were searched via Ovid until January 2023. We included studies describing the development or validation  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10359893 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8923829 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5411980 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6466172 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9291009 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10967162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8022521 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8813677 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5352465 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10859585 | biostudies-literature