Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-utility analysis of early reconstruction surgery versus conservative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in a lower-middle income country.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The ideal approach for treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is still disputed. This study aimed to determine the more cost-effective strategy by comparing early ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery to conservative treatment (rehabilitation with optional delayed reconstruction) for ACL injury in a lower/middle-income country (LMIC), Indonesia.

Methods

A decision tree model was constructed for cost-utility analysis of early ACLR versus conservative treatment. The transition probabilities between states were obtained from the literature review. Utilities were measured by the EQ-5D-3 L from a prospective cohort study in a local hospital. The costs were obtained from a previous study that elaborated on the burden and cost of ACLR in Indonesia. Effectiveness was expressed in quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs). Principal outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Willingness-to-pay was set at US$12,876 - three times the Indonesian GDP per capita in 2021 - the currently accepted standard in Indonesia as suggested by the World Health Organization Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective criterion (WHO-CHOICE).

Results

The early ACLR group showed an incremental gain of 0.05 QALYs over the conservative treatment group, with a higher overall cost to society of US$976. The ICER of ACLR surgery was US$19,524 per QALY, above the WTP threshold of US$12,876. The ICER was sensitive to cost of conservative treatment, cost of ACLR, and rate of cross-over to delayed ACLR numbers in the conservative treatment group. Using the WTP threshold of US$12,876, the probability of conservative treatment being preferred over early ACLR was 64%.

Conclusions

Based on the current model, early ACLR surgery does not seem more cost-effective compared to conservative treatment for ACL injury patients in Indonesia. Because the result was sensitive to the rate of cross-over probabilities from the conservative treatment alone to delayed ACLR, a future study with a long-term perspective is needed to further elucidate its impact.

SUBMITTER: Deviandri R 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11234700 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-utility analysis of early reconstruction surgery versus conservative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in a lower-middle income country.

Deviandri Romy R   van der Veen Hugo C HC   Purba Abdul Khairul R AKR   Icanervilia Ajeng V AV   Lubis Andri Mt AM   van den Akker-Scheek Inge I   Postma Maarten J MJ  

BMC health services research 20240709 1


<h4>Background</h4>The ideal approach for treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is still disputed. This study aimed to determine the more cost-effective strategy by comparing early ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery to conservative treatment (rehabilitation with optional delayed reconstruction) for ACL injury in a lower/middle-income country (LMIC), Indonesia.<h4>Methods</h4>A decision tree model was constructed for cost-utility analysis of early ACLR versus conservative treatment. The  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8322670 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7451438 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4246405 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11863276 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8085440 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5263705 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3678631 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7587499 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3678617 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6112256 | biostudies-literature