Project description:Sepsis is the dysregulated immune response to severe infection that is common and lethal among critically ill patients. Fluid administration is a common treatment for hypotension and shock in early sepsis. Fluid therapy can also cause edema and organ dysfunction. Research on the best treatment strategies for sepsis has provided insights on the optimal timing, dose, and type of fluid to treat patients with sepsis. Initial research on early goal-directed therapy for sepsis included an initial bolus of 30 ml/kg of fluid, but more recent research has supported use of smaller volumes. After initial fluid resuscitation, minimizing additional fluid administration may be beneficial, but no single measure has been established as the best method to guide ongoing fluid management in sepsis. Dynamic measures of "fluid responsiveness" can predict which patients will experience an increase in cardiac output from a fluid bolus. Use of such a measure in clinical care remains limited by applicability to patient populations and uncertainty regarding the effect on clinical outcomes. Recent research informs the effect of fluid composition on outcomes for patients with sepsis. Current data support the use of balanced crystalloids, rather than saline, and the use of crystalloids, rather than semisynthetic colloids. The role for albumin administration in sepsis remains uncertain. Future research should focus on determining the optimal volume of fluid during sepsis resuscitation, the effectiveness of measures of "fluid responsiveness" in improving outcomes, the optimal composition of crystalloid solutions, the role of albumin, and the effects of "deresuscitation" after septic shock.
Project description:ObjectiveVasopressin has systemic vasoconstrictive yet pulmonary vasodilatory effects, making it an ideal agent for hypotension management in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)-associated pulmonary hypertension. The side effects of vasopressin in this population, such as hyponatremia, are understudied. This study aims to characterize the effect of vasopressin on sodium concentrations in infants with and without CDH.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients who received vasopressin while admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (blood sodium <135 mmol/L) during vasopressin therapy. Secondary outcomes included time to hyponatremia, dose and duration of vasopressin, incidence of severe hyponatremia (blood sodium <125 mmol/L), and hypertonic saline use. Both blood serum and blood gas sample sodium concentrations were used to compare CDH vs non-CDH patients.ResultsThe average difference between baseline and lowest blood sodium was significant for both CDH and non-CDH patients for all samples (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome, nor in the secondary outcomes of time to hyponatremia or duration of vasopressin infusion. The average dose of vasopressin was higher in the CDH vs non-CDH group (p = 0.018). The incidences of severe hyponatremia and hypertonic saline use were greater in the CDH vs non-CDH group for patients who had blood serum sodium samples collected (p = 0.049 and p = 0.033, respectively).ConclusionsThis study showed that severe hyponatremia occurred more frequently in CDH vs non-CDH patients. Extreme caution is necessary when managing total body sodium in patients with CDH.
Project description:PurposeIntravenous maintenance fluid therapy (IV-MFT) prescribing in acute and critically ill children is very variable among pediatric health care professionals. In order to provide up to date IV-MFT guidelines, the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) undertook a systematic review to answer the following five main questions about IV-MFT: (i) the indications for use (ii) the role of isotonic fluid (iii) the role of balanced solutions (iv) IV fluid composition (calcium, magnesium, potassium, glucose and micronutrients) and v) and the optimal amount of fluid.MethodsA multidisciplinary expert group within ESPNIC conducted this systematic review using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading method. Five databases were searched for studies that answered these questions, in acute and critically children (from 37 weeks gestational age to 18 years), published until November 2020. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed, and meta-analyses were undertaken when appropriate. A series of recommendations was derived and voted on by the expert group to achieve consensus through two voting rounds.Results56 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 16 recommendations were produced. Outcome reporting was inconsistent among studies. Recommendations generated were based on a heterogeneous level of evidence, but consensus within the expert group was high. "Strong consensus" was reached for 11/16 (69%) and "consensus" for 5/16 (31%) of the recommendations.ConclusionsKey recommendations are to use isotonic balanced solutions providing glucose to restrict IV-MFT infusion volumes in most hospitalized children and to regularly monitor plasma electrolyte levels, serum glucose and fluid balance.
Project description:Aim To investigate the sodium composition of maintenance intravenous fluids (mIVF) used by paediatric residents throughout the United States in common clinical scenarios of arginine vasopressin (AVP) excess.Methods We distributed an online survey to paediatric residency programmes asking what type of mIVF (0.2%, 0.45%, 0.9% NaCl or lactated Ringer's solution) they would administer in four common clinical scenarios of AVP excess (gastroenteritis, pneumonia, meningitis and postoperative) in both a 6-month-old (mo) and a 13-year-old (yo) child.Results We had 472 responses, representing 5% of the total paediatric residency population in the United States. Hypotonic mIVF were selected in 78% of children (88.2% of 6 mo and 68.5% of 13 yo). Isotonic mIVF were selected approximately twice as often for patients with meningitis as for those without (21.4% vs. 8.7% 6 mo and 42.8% vs. 27.7% 13 yo; p < 0.001).Conclusions The majority of US paediatric residents would prescribe hypotonic mIVF in disease states associated with AVP excess. However, a significant number of residents are using isotonic mIVF. Isotonic fluids are more likely to be prescribed in older children and children with meningitis.
Project description:Objetive: We sought to determine the association between maintenance intravenous solutions and the presence of hyponatremia in children in pediatric intensive care (PICU). Materials and Methods: An analytical observational study in children hospitalized in the PICU between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients who received maintenance fluids within the first 48 h after admission and who had at least two serum sodium levels drawn during this time were included. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1,668 patients were admitted to the PICU during the study period, 503 of whom met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 24 months (IQR 8-96) and 50.9% were female. Altogether, 24.1% of the children developed hyponatremia; it was more frequent in those who received hypotonic solutions (63 vs. 37%; OR 1.41 95% CI 0.92, 2.15 p = 0.106), who also had a longer hospital stay (20 vs. 14 days, difference in means 8 days, 95% CI 2.67, 13.3, p = 0.001). Children who received loop diuretics and those who were post-operative had a greater risk of developing hyponatremia if they received hypotonic solutions (aOR 2.1 95% CI 1.41, 3.0, p = 0.000). Those with balanced isotonic solutions had a lower risk of developing hyponatremia (aOR 0.59 95% CI 0.35, 0.99, p = 0.004) and hyperchloremia (aOR 0.51 95% CI 0.34, 0.77, p = 0.000), adjusted for disease severity. A greater risk of death was found in the group with severe hyponatremia <130 mEq/L (aOR 9.75 95% CI 1.64-58.15; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Hyponatremia associated with the use of hypotonic maintenance solutions occurs in one out of four children in intensive care. The use of these solutions is associated with a longer hospital stay, and the main risk groups are post-operative patients and those who receive loop diuretics. Clinical studies are needed to determine which maintenance solutions have the greatest efficacy and safety in critically ill children.
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine if increased mortality could be detected with the administration of ceftriaxone and IV calcium in infants through an analysis of a large repository of electronic health records.MethodsPatients were split into 3 groups: 1) neonates, 2) infants, and 3) infants <1 year whose age was not specified. Deaths were classified into mutually exclusive categories based on the administration and timing of ceftriaxone and IV calcium. Crude death rates were calculated, and logistic regression modeling was used to calculate adjusted relative odds of death with associated covariates.ResultsA total of 259,149 infants were identified. Of 79,038 neonates, the proportion of patients that received ceftriaxone and IV calcium within 48 hours who died was 3.8%, compared with 1.95% (IV calcium), 0.3% (ceftriaxone), 1.54% (IV fluids), and 2.03% (parenteral nutrition). For 102,456 infants, the proportions of deaths were 5.47% (ceftriaxone and IV calcium within 48 hours), 0.45% (IV calcium), 0.15% (ceftriaxone), 0.39% (IV fluids), and 5.5% (parenteral nutrition). Multivariate analysis showed increased odds of death in infants who received ceftriaxone and IV calcium within 48 hours, regardless of age, and propensity score-matched analysis showed a more than 2-fold increased risk for death.ConclusionsThe increased risk for death following ceftriaxone and IV calcium administration was noted not only in neonates, but among older infants as well.
Project description:A hyponatremic patient with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) gets normal saline (NS), and the plasma sodium decreases, paradoxically. To explain, desalination is often invoked: if urine is more concentrated than NS, the fluid’s salts are excreted while some water is reabsorbed, exacerbating hyponatremia. But comparing concentrations can be deceiving. They should be converted to quantities because mass balance is key to unlocking the paradox. The [sodium] equation can legitimately be used to track all of the sodium, potassium, and water entering and leaving the body. Each input or output “module” can be counterbalanced by a chosen iv fluid so that the plasma sodium stays stable. This equipoise is expressed in terms of the iv fluid’s infusion rate, an easy calculation called the ratio profile. Knowing the infusion rate that maintains steady state, we can prescribe the iv fluid at a faster rate in order to raise the plasma sodium. Rates less than the ratio profile may risk a paradox, which essentially is caused by an iv fluid underdosing. Selecting an iv fluid that is more concentrated than urine is not enough to prevent paradoxes; even 3% saline can be underdosed. Drinking water adds to the ratio profile and is underestimated in its ability to provoke a paradox. In conclusion, the quantitative approach demystifies the paradoxical worsening of hyponatremia in SIAD and offers a prescriptive guide to keep the paradox from happening. The ratio profile method is objective and quickly deployable on rounds, where it may change patient management for the better.
Project description:I.V. fluid therapy plays a fundamental role in the management of hospitalized patients. While the correct use of i.v. fluids can be lifesaving, recent literature demonstrates that fluid therapy is not without risks. Indeed, the use of certain types and volumes of fluid can increase the risk of harm, and even death, in some patient groups. Data from a recent audit show us that the inappropriate use of fluids may occur in up to 20% of patients receiving fluid therapy. The delegates of the 12th Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Conference sought to obtain consensus on the use of i.v. fluids with the aim of producing guidance for their use. In this article, we review a recently proposed model for fluid therapy in severe sepsis and propose a framework by which it could be adopted for use in most situations where fluid management is required. Considering the dose-effect relationship and side-effects of fluids, fluid therapy should be regarded similar to other drug therapy with specific indications and tailored recommendations for the type and dose of fluid. By emphasizing the necessity to individualize fluid therapy, we hope to reduce the risk to our patients and improve their outcome.
Project description:Newborn infants are prone to sepsis and related inflammation of different organs. Neuroinflammation has been associated with long-term adverse neuronal (neuropsychiatric/neurodegenerative) outcomes, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or even Alzheimer's disease. Despite a vast number of findings on sepsis-induced inflammatory responses in the central nervous system (CNS), how neuroinflammation affects brain development remains largely elusive. In this study, neonates with clinical sepsis and screened for meningitis were included and classified by the neuroinflammation status based on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters (INF vs. NOINF). CSF samples collected from clinical screening were subjected to proteomics analysis. Proteins with differential abundance were subjected to enrichment analysis to reveal affected biological pathways. INF and NOINF infants had similar demographic data and hematological and biochemical parameters in blood and CSF. The CSF proteomes were essentially different between the two groups. All 65 proteins with differential abundance showed lower abundance in the INF group and functionally covered pivotal developmental processes, including axonal and synaptic function and extracellular homeostasis. CSF proteins, PTPRZ1 and IGFBP4, were correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) and ratios of immature/total neutrophils in blood. In general, a substantial change in the CSF protein profile was found under neuroinflammation, and these changes are related to systemic conditions. The results suggest that changes in CSF proteins may be involved in sepsis-affected neurodevelopment, such as disturbances in circuit formation, which has the potential to predispose neonates to long-term adverse outcomes.
Project description:ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of isotonic and hypotonic intravenous fluids in maintenance fluid therapy for term infants.MethodsThis was a multi-centre, prospective, observational study conducted in 21 participating centres from December 30, 2020, to June 30, 2023. The study included term newborns requiring parenteral fluid therapy for maintenance (NCT04781361). The fluid treatment was divided into two groups based on the concentration of sodium in the parenteral fluid, designated as hypotonic (NaCl <130 mmol/L) and isotonic (NaCl = 130-154 mmol/L). The primary outcomes were the change in mean plasma sodium (pNa) levels per hour (∆pNa mmol/L/h), the incidence of hyponatremia (pNa <135 mmol/L) and hypernatremia (pNa >145 mmol/L), and the occurrence of clinically significant changes in sodium levels (∆pNa >0.5 mmol/L/h).ResultsA total of 420 patients from 21 centers were included. The ∆pNa was negative in the hypotonic fluid group and positive in the isotonic fluid group, with a significant difference between the groups [respectively -0.07 ± 0.03 (95% CI: -0.13 to -0.02); 0.04 ± 0.03 (95%CI: -0.02 to 0.09), p = 0.04]. There was no difference between the groups in terms of the development of hypernatremia or a clinically meaningful pNa increase. The hypotonic fluid group had a higher incidence of hyponatremia and a clinically meaningful sodium decrease compared to the isotonic fluid group [7.9% vs. 1.2% (OR:6.5, p:0.03)] and [12.2% vs.4.2% (OR:2.9, p = 0.03)].ConclusionContrary to current understanding, this large-scale study is the first to demonstrate that the use of hypotonic fluids in maintenance fluid therapy for newborns poses a risk of hyponatremia development, whereas isotonic fluid therapy appears safe.