Dataset Information

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Background: Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). Methods: Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patients with AF were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 22 April 2024. Primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the first AF ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and procedure-related complication rate. Sensitivity analysis including only patients with LVA demonstration at mapping and multiple subgroups analyses were also performed. Results: 1547 patients from 7 studies were included. LVA ablation in addition to PVI reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.81, p < 0.001) with a number needed to treat to prevent recurrence of 10. No difference in procedure time (mean difference [MD] -5.32 min, 95% CI -19.01-8.46 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (MD -1.10 min, 95% CI -2.48-0.28 min, p = 0.12) and complication rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.61, p = 0.54) was observed. Consistent results were demonstrated when considering only patients with LVA during mapping and in prespecified subgroups for AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent), multicentric vs. monocentric trial, and ablation strategy in control group. Conclusions: In patients with AF, ablation of LVAs in addition to PVI reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence without a significant increase in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or complication rate.

SUBMITTER: Valcher S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11313645 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Valcher Stefano S Villaschi Alessandro A Falasconi Giulio G Chiarito Mauro M Giunti Filippo F Novelli Laura L Addeo Lucio L Taormina Antonio A Panico Cristina C Francia Pietro P Saglietto Andrea A Del Monaco Guido G Latini Alessia Chiara AC Carli Sebastiano S Frittella Stefano S Giaj Levra Alessandro A Antonelli Giulia G Preda Alberto A Guarracini Fabrizio F Mazzone Patrizio P Berruezo Antonio A Tritto Massimo M Condorelli Gianluigi G Penela Diego D

Journal of clinical medicine 20240803 15

<b>Background:</b> Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). <b>Methods:</b> Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patien ...[more]

PMID: 39124807

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is not guaranteed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and it is unclear which type of ablation approach should be applied in addition to PVI. This study aimed to compare outcomes and prognosis between empirical linear ablation and low-voltage area (LVA) ablation after PVI for PeAF.MethodsWe enrolled 128 patients with PeAF who were assigned to the linear ablation group (n = 64) and the LVA ablation group (n = 64) using a propensity score-matched model. After PVI and cardioversion, the patients underwent either empirical linear ablation or LVA ablation during sinus rhythm. All patients in the linear ablation group underwent both roof line and mitral valve isthmus (MVI) ablations. An electrical-guided ablation targeting LVA (< 0.5 mV) was performed in the LVA group. When there was no LVA in the LVA group, only PVI was applied. We compared the procedural outcomes and recurrence after ablation between the two groups.ResultsThe baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Fifty patients had LVA (22 and 28 patients in the linear and LVA groups). The roof and MVI lines were completed in 100% and 96.9% of the patients. During the mean follow-up of 279.5 ± 161.3 days, the LVA group had significantly lower recurrence than the linear group (15 patients [23%] vs. 29 patients [45%], p = 0.014). Thirty-five patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs during the follow-up period (linear group, n = 17; LVA group, n = 18); amiodarone and bepridil were administered to most of the patients (15 and 17 patients, respectively). The difference in the prognosis was relevant among the patients with LVA, while this trend was not observed in those without LVA. The LVA ablation group demonstrated significantly lower radiofrequency energy and shorter procedural time compared to the linear ablation group. The recurrence of atrial flutter was more likely to occur in the linear group than in the LVA group (14 [22%] vs. 6 [9.4%], p = 0.052).ConclusionThe electrophysiological-guided LVA ablation is more effective than empirical linear ablation in PeAF patients with LVA. Unnecessary empirical linear ablation might have a risk of iatrogenic gap and atrial flutter recurrence.

Project description:ImportanceThe overall success rate of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remains suboptimal, especially in older patients.ObjectiveTo explore the incremental benefit of low-voltage-area ablation after CPVI in older patients with paroxysmal AF.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized clinical trial was an investigator-initiated trial to compare the efficacy of additional low-voltage-area ablation beyond CPVI vs CPVI alone in older patients with paroxysmal AF. Participants were patients aged 65 to 80 years with paroxysmal AF who were referred for catheter ablation. They were enrolled in 14 tertiary hospitals in China from April 1, 2018, to August 3, 2020, and follow-up occurred through August 15, 2021.InterventionsPatients were randomized (1:1) to undergo CPVI plus low-voltage-area ablation or CPVI alone. Low-voltage areas were defined as areas with amplitude less than 0.5 mV in more than 3 adjacent points. If low-voltage areas existed, additional substrate ablation was performed in the CPVI plus group but not the CPVI alone group.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point of the study was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia as documented by electrocardiogram during a clinical visit or lasting longer than 30 seconds during Holter recordings occurring after a single ablation procedure.ResultsAmong 438 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 70.5 [4.4] years; 219 men [50%]), 24 (5.5%) did not complete the blanking period and were not included for efficacy analysis. After a median follow-up of 23 months, the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia was significantly lower in the CPVI plus group (31/209 patients, 15%) compared with the CPVI alone group (49/205, 24%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95; P = .03). In subgroup analyses, among all patients with low-voltage area, CPVI plus substrate modification was associated with a 51% decreased risk of ATA recurrence compared with CPVI alone (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94; P = .03).Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that additional low-voltage-area ablation beyond CPVI decreased the ATA recurrence in older patients with paroxysmal AF compared with CPVI alone. Our findings merit further replication by larger trials with longer follow-up.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03462628.

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a foundational treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), but the effectiveness of adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) and selective complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation in the roof and anterior wall remains debated. The potential of these additional ablation techniques to improve long-term outcomes for PeAF patients is still uncertain.MethodsThis retrospective study included 151 PeAF patients who underwent first-time catheter ablation at our center. The choice of ablation strategy was based on the operator's clinical judgment, taking into account the patient's specific condition and anatomical features. Patients were divided into two groups: the PVI group, which received PVI alone, and the modified PWI (MPWI) group, which received PVI along with additional PWI and selective CFAEs ablation in the roof and anterior wall. The primary endpoint was the absence of atrial arrhythmia lasting more than 30 s, without antiarrhythmic drugs, at 12 months.ResultsAt the 12-month follow-up, 77.3% of the patients in the MPWI group and 52.1% of the patients in the PVI group remained in sinus rhythm without an atrial arrhythmia recurrence (p = 0.001). The BIC-based Cox regression analysis identified the ablation strategy and atrial fibrillation (AF) duration as independent predictors of recurrence across the cohort. It was found that MPWI significantly reduced the risk of recurrence, while a longer AF duration increased it. In the MPWI group, AF duration, left ventricular internal diameter in systole (LVIDs), and moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation were independent predictors of recurrence. In the PVI group, only the left atrial low voltage area (LVA) index was a significant predictor.ConclusionThe addition of PWI and selective CFAE ablation to PVI significantly improves 12-month arrhythmia-free survival compared to PVI alone, demonstrating the superiority of this combined approach in improving long-term outcomes for patients with persistent AF.

Dataset Information

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets