Meta-analysis of robotic-assisted NOSE versus traditional TWSR in colorectal cancer surgery: postoperative outcomes and efficacy
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhan S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11342584 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundNatural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer has been introduced in order to reduce the abdominal incision, demonstrating major development potential in minimally invasive surgery. We are conducting this randomized controlled trial to assess whether robotic NOSES is non-inferior to traditional robotic-assisted surgery for patients with colorectal cancer in terms of primary and secondary outcomes.Method/designAccordingly, a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, and non-inferiority trial will be conducted to discuss the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice extraction surgery compared to traditional robotic-assisted surgery. Here, 550 estimated participants will be enrolled to have 80% power to detect differences with a one-sided significance level of 0.025 in consideration of the non-inferiority margin of 10%. The primary outcome is the incidence of surgical complications, which will be classified using the Clavien-Dindo system.DiscussionThis trial is expected to reveal whether robotic NOSES is non-inferior to traditional robotic-assisted surgery, which is of great significance in regard to the development of robotic NOSES for patients with colorectal cancer in the minimally invasive era. Furthermore, robotic NOSES is expected to exhibit superiority to traditional robotic-assisted surgery in terms of both primary and secondary outcomes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230772 . Registered on January 15, 2020.
| S-EPMC7866755 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this study, the investigators will compare the clinical outcomes of the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
| 2327127 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:AimPostoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) is a common complication following colorectal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of POGD after minimally invasive surgery and to assess the relationship between robotic surgery, POGD, and their outcomes.MethodPatients who had undergone minimally invasive colorectal surgery at our institution between July 2018 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. POGD was diagnosed based on the presence of two or more intestinal symptoms within 72 h or more after surgery. Risk factors were identified through regression analyses, and the impact of POGD on outcomes was assessed using linear regression.The association between those factors was assessed using subgroup analysis and hierarchical regression.ResultsA total of 226 patients were included in the analysis, including 33 with POGD. POGD occurred in 14.6% of patients, with a lower incidence in robotic surgery (7.3%) than in laparoscopic surgery (19.8%). Multivariate analysis indicated that robotic surgery had a protective effect, while blood loss exceeding 50 ml was an independent risk factor for POGD. POGD was also correlated with longer length of stays and higher costs. The association between POGD, length of stay, and cost varied depending on the surgical platform. Robotic surgery exacerbated the effect of POGD on short-term outcomes, which aligned with the observed significant interaction effect.ConclusionPOGD remains a prevalent postoperative disease. Preventive strategies, including meticulous hemostasis techniques and robotic surgery, should be prioritized by healthcare professionals to reduce POGD risk, improve short-term outcomes, and preserve healthcare resources.
| S-EPMC11486807 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are associated with reduced hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the introduction of ERAS care improved the adverse events in colorectal surgery. In a cohort study, mortality, morbidity, and length of stay were compared between ERAS patients and carefully matched historical controls. METHODS: Patients were matched for their type of disease, the type of surgery, P-Possum (Portsmouth-Possum), CR-Possum (Colorectal-Possum) Physiological and Operative Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM), gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. The primary outcome measures of this study were mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcome measures were fluid intake, length of hospital stay, the number of relaparotomies, and the number of readmissions within 30 days. Data on the ERAS patients were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients treated according to the ERAS program were compared with 122 patients who received conventional postoperative care. The two groups were comparable with respect to age, ASA grade, P-Possum (Portsmouth-Possum), CR-Possum (Colorectal-Possum) score, type of surgery, stoma formation, type of disease, and gender. Morbidity was lower in the ERAS group compared to the control group (14.8% versus 33.6% respectively; P = <0.01). Patients in the ERAS group received significantly less fluid and spent fewer days in the hospital (median 6 days, range 3-50 vs. median 9 days, range 3-138; P = 0.032). There was no difference between the ERAS and the control group for mortality (0% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.55) and readmission rate (3.3% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.60). CONCLUSION: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program reduces morbidity and the length of hospital stay for patients undergoing elective colonic or rectal surgery.
| S-EPMC2793377 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundRobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) can achieve traditional clinical outcomes comparable to those of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during the early period after RATS and VATS remain unclear. This study aimed to utilize longitudinal electronic PRO (ePRO) assessments to evaluate symptom burden and functional status between these approaches from patients' perspective.MethodsThis study comprised patients who underwent lobectomy via RATS or VATS for non-small cell lung cancer. We collected multiple-time-point PROs data from the prospective longitudinal study via an ePRO system. Symptom severity and function status were assessed using the perioperative symptom assessment for patients undergoing lung surgery and were analyzed between groups using linear mixed-effects models.ResultsOf the 164 patients, 42 underwent RATS and 122 underwent VATS. After propensity score matching (PSM), 42 RATS and 84 VATS exhibited similar baseline characteristics. During the 7-day postoperative period, participants underwent RATS reported milder pain (p = 0.014), coughing (p < 0.001), drowsiness (p = 0.001), and distress (p = 0.045) compared with those underwent VATS. Moreover, participants in RATS group showed less functional interference with walking (p < 0.001) and general activity (p < 0.001). RATS exhibited a shorter postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.021) but higher hospital cost (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, short-term clinical outcomes of operative time, dissected lymph node stations, chest tube drainage, and postoperative complication rates were comparable.ConclusionPROs are important metrics for assessing patients' recovery after lobectomy. Compared with VATS, RATS may induce less symptom burden and better functional status for patients in the early postoperative period.
| S-EPMC11246782 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to report the experience of robotic-assisted cardiac surgery (RACS) using the Da Vinci robotic surgical system, meanwhile its efficacy and safety was also evaluated by comparing with traditional open-heart surgery (TOHS), thus to provide evidence for a broader application of RACS in clinical practice.MethodsFrom July 2017 to May 2022, a total of 255 patients who underwent cardiac surgery assisted by Da Vinci robotic surgery system in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, which included 134 males with an average age of 52.6±6.3 years and 121 females with an average age of 51.8±5.4 years. They were defined as the RACS group. By searching the hospital's electronic medical record information system, 736 patients with the same disease types who underwent median sternotomy and had complete data in the same period were selected as the TOHS group. Intra- and postoperative clinical results of the both groups were compared, and we focused the following indices including surgery time, reoperation rate for postoperative bleeding, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative hospitalization day, the number of died and withdrawing treatments, and the time of patients back to normal daily activities after discharge.ResultsIn RACS group, 2 patients were scheduled to undergo mitral valvuloplasty (MVP), but they had to change to mitral valve replacement (MVR) due to unsatisfactory results; furthermore, 1 patient who received atrial septal defect (ASD) repair experienced abdominal hemorrhage because a rupture of abdominal aorta which were induced by the femoral arterial cannulation, and this patient eventually died of invalid rescue. As for the comparison of clinical results between both groups, there were no significant statistical differences in reoperation rate for postoperative bleeding, and the number of died and withdrawing treatments between both groups. However, length ICU stay, postoperative hospitalization day, and the time of patients back to normal daily activities after discharge was lower in RACS group in addition to the surgery time.ConclusionsCompared with TOHS, RACS is safe and effective in clinical and is worthy of promotion in an appropriate place.
| S-EPMC10183528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRobotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a growing technique in adult reconstruction. The variations between robotic-assisted and conventional TKA could lead to changes in immediate postoperative outcomes. We aimed to evaluate for differences in postoperative pain, discharge day, as well as post-hospital disposition (home vs subacute rehabilitation facility [SAR]) between robotic-assisted and conventional TKA.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 2 cohorts of patients who underwent either conventional or robotic-assisted TKA between January 2019 and July 2019. Their average pain scores from postoperative day 0, day 1, and day 2 were recorded. Their postoperative discharge day was recorded, as well as their disposition to either home or a SAR. Preoperatively, all patients are offered robotic-assisted TKA, and only those who want the procedure and undergo a preoperative CT scan receive the robotic-assisted surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS.ResultsOne hundred sixty-six patients were identified with 83 in each cohort. No differences between age, race, and gender were found. Despite minor variations in pain levels, the overall postoperative pain score analysis did not strongly favor one technique over the other. The robotic-assisted group had a significantly higher amount of patients discharged to home instead of a SAR and also had a shorter time to discharge than the conventional group.ConclusionsRobotic-assisted TKA has similar postoperative pain scores compared with conventional TKA. The robotic-assisted cohort demonstrated other benefits including earlier discharge and are more likely to be discharged home instead of a SAR.
| S-EPMC7921755 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Robotic technology is positioned to transform the approach to tracheobronchial surgery. With its magnified 3D view, intuitive controls, wristed-instruments, high-fidelity simulation platforms, and the steady implementation of new technical improvement, the robot is well-suited to manage the careful dissection and delicate handling of the airway in tracheobronchial surgery. This innovative technology has the potential to promote the widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques for this complex thoracic surgery.
| S-EPMC7656404 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe introduction of robotic technologies into the field of arthroplasty ushered in promises of increased precision and superior outcomes over conventional methods. However, the effect on outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains debatable, particularly when considering the additional financial burden created by the addition of robotics. The purpose of this study is to examine total cost of care, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative complications in robotic-assisted vs conventional THA recipients.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of the Mariner database was performed within PearlDiver Technologies for patients undergoing THA from 2010 to 2018 (n = 714,859). Patients with robotic-assisted procedures were matched with patients undergoing conventional THA at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking, and obesity status (n = 4630). LOS, total cost of care, readmission rates, and medical and surgical outcomes were examined.ResultsRobotic-assisted patients had shorter average LOS (3.4 vs 3.7 days, P = .001). The mean cost for robotic-assisted patients was $1684 and $1759 less at 90 days and 1 year, respectively (both P = .001). Readmission rates were higher for robotic-assisted patients at 1 year (7.8 vs 6.6%; P = .001), while surgical outcomes were not significantly different at all timepoints (all P > .498). Robotic-assisted patients demonstrated significantly higher blood transfusion rates (4.4 vs 3.2%; P = .001).ConclusionsRobotic-assisted THA was associated with minimal decreases in LOS and costs as compared to conventional methods. However, robotics was associated with slightly higher readmissions and blood transfusions.
| S-EPMC8105177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Stress response to robot-assisted colorectal surgery is largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted a prospective comparative nonrandomized study evaluating the perioperative dynamics of chemokines: IL-8/CXCL8, MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1α/CCL3, MIP-1β/CCL4, RANTES/CCL5, and eotaxin-1/CCL11 in 61 colorectal cancer patients following open colorectal surgery (OCS) or robot-assisted surgery (RACS) in reference to clinical data. Postoperative IL-8 and MCP-1 increase was reduced in RACS with a magnitude of blood loss, length of surgery, and concomitant up-regulation of IL-6 and TNFα as its independent predictors. RANTES at 8 h dropped in RACS and RANTES, and MIP1α/β at 24 h were more elevated in RACS than OCS. IL-8 and MCP-1 at 72 h remained higher in patients subsequently developing surgical site infections, in whom a 2.6- and 2.5-fold increase was observed. IL-8 up-regulation at 24 h in patients undergoing open procedure was predictive of anastomotic leak (AL; 94% accuracy). Changes in MCP-1 and RANTES were predictive of delayed restoration of bowel function. Chemokines behave differently depending on procedure. A robot-assisted approach may be beneficial in terms of chemokine dynamics by favoring Th1 immunity and attenuated angiogenic potential and postoperative ileus. Monitoring chemokine dynamics may prove useful for predicting adverse clinical events. Attenuated chemokine up-regulation results from less severe blood loss and diminished inflammatory response.
| S-EPMC6616914 | biostudies-literature