Dataset Information

Safety and efficacy of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Materials and methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database establishment to April 2023. Literature quality was independently evaluated by two investigators using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, and the systematic analysis was made using StateSE15 and RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Four RCTs were included, including 1751 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Meta-analysis showed that the differences in efficacy and adverse events (AEs) between the Deucravacitinib group and placebo group were significant (p < 0.05). The patients in the Deucravacitinib group took orally 3-12 mg daily for 12 sequential weeks or 6 mg daily for 52 sequential weeks. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) reduced by 75% (PASI 75), (PASI 90), and (PASI 100), static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1), Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1 (DLQI 0/1), and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) were significantly higher in the Deucravacitinib group compared to the placebo group, with significant differences (p < 0.05). The most frequently encountered AEs after treatment in the Deucravacitinib group was nasopharyngitis.

Conclusion

Oral administration of Deucravacitinib is effective for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Attention should be paid to the occurrence of AEs, and more RCTs are required to evaluate the relationship between the dose and safety and efficacy.

SUBMITTER: Hu C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11344170 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety and efficacy of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A meta-analysis.

Hu Caixia C Han Xiaomei X Cui Yu Y Zhang Yan Y Cheng Yi Y

Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) 20240801 8

<h4>Background</h4>To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from database establishment to April 2023. Literature quality was independently evaluated by two investigators using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool, and the systemat ...[more]

PMID: 39180322

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPsoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated skin condition with significant detriments to physical/mental health. While systemic therapies are available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, patients can experience therapeutic failure, loss of efficacy, or medical contraindications that require other therapeutic options.ObjectiveWith the recent approval of deucravacitinib, a first-in-class TYK2 small molecule inhibitor administered orally for psoriasis patients, we reviewed data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to synthesize its clinical utility. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of deucravacitinib comparing its clinical efficacy to placebo in psoriasis.MethodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify RCTs studying deucravacitinib in human patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.ResultsOne placebo-controlled Phase II RCT and two placebo-controlled/active-comparator Phase III RCTs were included for review. Patients (N=1953) treated with deucravacitinib 6 mg daily showed marked improvement in disease severity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) and quality-of-life outcomes compared to patients administered comparator (apremilast) and placebo. Clinical improvement given deucravacitinib was noted for scalp psoriasis but not fingernail psoriasis. Meta-analysis (deucravacitinib, n=888; placebo, n=466) comparing rates of clearance (sPGA 0/1) demonstrated superior efficacy of deucravacitinib compared to placebo (odds ratio, 12.87; 95% confidence interval, 8.97-18.48; χ2=4.08, I2=51%). Deucravacitinib was well-tolerated, with similar rate of occurrence and type of adverse events reported among patients treated with placebo or apremilast at Week 12-16. No cardiovascular events, serious infections, or lab abnormalities were noted.ConclusionDeucravacitinib possesses good efficacy, with no report of safety concerns associated with prior JAK inhibitors used for psoriasis. Meta-analysis demonstrated deucravacitinib's superiority compared to placebo, indicating its promising clinical utility. Further studies are needed to observe long-term safety and efficacy, and to compare deucravacitinib to existing treatments.

Project description:IntroductionDeucravacitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, is approved in the United States to treat adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO). This study compared the long-term efficacy of deucravacitinib and adalimumab using results from long-term extension (LTE) trials.MethodsOpen-label LTE trials were identified for an indirect treatment comparison (deucravacitinib: POETYK PSO-LTE [NCT04036435]; adalimumab: REVEAL extension [NCT00195676]). To ensure study design comparability, patients initially randomized to placebo and switched to deucravacitinib or adalimumab after week 16 were compared. The primary outcome was an ≥ 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) at week 112 postrandomization. Secondary outcomes were PASI 75 at week 52 and an ≥ 90% reduction in PASI score (PASI 90) at weeks 52 and 112. Missing PASI data were imputed. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted; individual patient-level data from POETYK PSO-LTE were reweighted to balance baseline characteristics with those from the REVEAL extension.ResultsBefore reweighting, on average, patients in the POETYK PSO-LTE (N = 329) versus the REVEAL (N = 345) extension were older, had a lower body weight, received more prior systemic treatments, and had higher baseline PASI scores and week 16 placebo PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates. Following reweighting, adjusted week 112 PASI 75 response rates were significantly higher for deucravacitinib versus adalimumab (67.2% vs. 54.0%; mean difference [95% CI], 13.2 [4.0-22.5] percentage points). Deucravacitinib had a numerically higher adjusted week 112 PASI 90 response rate (41.3% vs. 34.0%; mean difference [95% CI], 7.3 [-2.0 to 16.7] percentage points). The treatments had similar week 52 adjusted PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates.ConclusionIn this interim analysis, adults with moderate to severe PsO had higher long-term response rates at 2 years when treated with deucravacitinib versus adalimumab. Deucravacitinib response rates remained stable whereas adalimumab response rates declined in year 2.

Project description:ImportanceSafe and effective long-term treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis are needed.ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of deucravacitinib through 3 years (week 148) in the randomized POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and nonrandomized long-term extension (LTE) trials.Design, setting, and participantsPSO-1/PSO-2 were global, 52-week, randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trials in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. After completing 52 weeks of treatment in PSO-1/PSO-2, patients could enroll in the prespecified, ongoing, nonrandomized LTE trial. The peak of the global COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the LTE trial. Patient enrollment in the LTE started August 12, 2019; safety and efficacy were assessed through June 15, 2022; and these data were analyzed through June 28, 2024.InterventionsThe PSO-1/PSO-2 trials randomized patients 1:2:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib, 6 mg once daily, or apremilast, 30 mg twice daily. Patients enrolling in the LTE trial received open-label deucravacitinib, 6 mg once daily.Main outcomes and measuresSafety outcomes were evaluated in patients who received 1 or more doses of deucravacitinib. Efficacy outcomes included 75% or greater or 90% or greater reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75/90) and static Physician Global Assessment scores of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) and were assessed in patients who received deucravacitinib treatment from day 1 of the parent trials who continued in the LTE trial.ResultsOf 1519 patients who received 1 or more doses of deucravacitinib, 513 received continuous deucravacitinib treatment from day 1 and entered the LTE trial. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 person-years were decreased or similar in the 1-year vs 3-year cumulative periods, respectively, for adverse events (AEs) (229.2 vs 144.8; 95% CI, 215.4-243.9 vs 137.1-153.0), serious AEs (5.7 vs 5.5; 95% CI, 4.4-7.4 vs 4.7-6.4), discontinuations due to AEs (4.4 vs 2.4; 95% CI, 3.3-5.9 vs 2.0-3.0), and deaths (0.2 vs 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8 vs 0.2-0.6). Incidence rates of the most common AEs (EAIR per 100 person-years ≥5) during the 1-year and 3-year cumulative periods, respectively, were nasopharyngitis (26.1 vs 11.4; 95% CI, 23.0-29.8 vs 10.2-12.7), COVID-19 (0.5 vs 8.0; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2 vs 7.1-9.1), and upper respiratory tract infection (13.4 vs 6.2; 95% CI, 11.3-16.0 vs 5.4-7.2). EAIRs for AEs of interest, including herpes zoster, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignant diseases, remained low and were decreased or comparable between the 1-year and 3-year cumulative periods. Clinical response rates were maintained through 3 years.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this integrated analysis of the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and nonrandomized LTE trials demonstrate a consistent safety profile and durable clinical response of continuous treatment with deucravacitinib through 3 years of treatment in patients with psoriasis.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03624127, NCT03611751, and NCT04036435.

Project description:IntroductionBiologic treatments have made complete skin clearance in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis a real possibility. Although clinical trials demonstrated the superiority of bimekizumab over secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, direct comparisons with other biologics are not available. This systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of bimekizumab versus other biologic systemic therapies for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.MethodsWe conducted an SLR to retrieve published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsycINFO on 13 January 2022. Two NMA types were used to analyse the long-term achievement of 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100): (1) NMA of cumulative clinical benefits, based on the area under the curve, from week 0 to 52; (2) multinomial NMA at weeks 44‒60. Binomial NMA was used to evaluate long-term serious adverse events (SAEs).ResultsThe SLR identified 38 RCTs, of which 19 were included in the NMA. Bimekizumab 320 mg administered every 4 weeks to week 16 then every 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) showed a greater cumulative average number of days of PASI 100 response compared with all other biologics. These differences were statistically significant versus all biologics, except risankizumab 150 mg. The multinomial NMA demonstrated that interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were the most efficacious treatments. No significant differences were found in long-term occurrence of SAEs.ConclusionBimekizumab 320 mg Q4W/Q8W was superior to most other treatments in maintaining complete skin clearance during the first year of treatment. It demonstrated a greater cumulative average number of days with completely clear skin while displaying a comparable safety profile compared with all other biologics.

Project description:IntroductionDeucravacitinib, a newly approved oral medication for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, demonstrated efficacy versus apremilast and placebo in two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) indirectly compared deucravacitinib with other relevant systemic biologic/nonbiologic treatments.MethodsOnline databases were searched for RCTs published through October 2021. Eligible studies were head-to-head comparisons between systemic therapies and/or placebo reporting 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Comparisons included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, and IL 12/23 inhibitors, and systemic nonbiologics. A multinomial Bayesian NMA was used to derive estimates of the relative efficacy of deucravacitinib and other systemic therapies. Response probabilities for each treatment and corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for achieving a PASI response were calculated over short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up (weeks 10-16, 24-28, and 44-60).ResultsThe NMA included 47 RCTs. Deucravacitinib showed the highest PASI 75 response rates among nonbiologic systemic therapies across time points. Deucravacitinib PASI 75 response rate (95% CrI) over short-term follow-up was 54.1% (46.5-61.6), within the range of first-generation biologics (etanercept, 39.7% [31.6-48.3]; infliximab, 79.0% [74.0-83.5]). At mid-term follow-up, deucravacitinib PASI 75 increased to 63.3% (58.0-68.4). At long-term follow-up, deucravacitinib PASI 75 was 65.9% (58.0-73.4), comparable to first-generation biologics adalimumab (62.8%; 55.3-69.6) and ustekinumab (68.0%; 64.6-71.5).ConclusionsPatients receiving deucravacitinib were more likely to achieve PASI 75 response versus apremilast and methotrexate across all time points. The long-term PASI 75 response rate for deucravacitinib was similar to those of adalimumab and ustekinumab. The approval of deucravacitinib offers patients the choice of an oral therapy with long-term efficacy similar to that of some biologics.

Project description:IntroductionThe clinical benefits of biologic and oral treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis are well-established, but efficacy outcomes can vary across therapies. Comparative efficacy analysis can be highly informative in clinical settings with multiple therapeutic options. This study assessed the short-term and long-term comparative efficacy of biologic and oral treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.MethodsA systematic literature review identified phase 2/3/4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through to 1 July 2020 for Food and Drug Administration- or European Medicines Agency-licensed treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 response rates at the end of the primary response (short-term: 10-16 weeks from baseline) and maintenance periods (long-term: 48-52 weeks from baseline) were estimated using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were estimated to present the relative ranking of treatments.ResultsIn the short term (N = 71 RCTs), the PASI 90 response rates were highest for ixekizumab (72.9%, SUCRA 0.951), risankizumab (72.5%, 0.940), and brodalumab (72.0%, 0.930), which were significantly higher than those for guselkumab (65.0%, 0.795), secukinumab (65.0%, 0.794), infliximab (56.8%, 0.702), certolizumab (400 mg: 49.6%, 0.607; 200 mg: 42.2%, 0.389), ustekinumab (90 mg: 47.9%, 0.568; weight-based: 45.7%, 0.505; 45 mg: 44.6%, 0.460), adalimumab (43.0%, 0.410), tildrakizumab (200 mg: 39.7%, 0.327; 100 mg: 37.2%, 0.268), etanercept (18.0%, 0.171), apremilast (12.4%, 0.090), and dimethyl fumarate (12.2%, 0.092). The PASI 100 response rates were highest for ixekizumab (41.4%), risankizumab (40.8%), and brodalumab (40.3%). In the long term (N = 11 RCTs), the PASI 90 rate was highest for risankizumab (85.3%, SUCRA: 0.998), which were significantly higher than those for brodalumab (78.8%, 0.786), guselkumab (78.1%, 0.760), ixekizumab (72.1%, 0.577), secukinumab (67.0%, 0.450), ustekinumab (weight-based: 55.0%, 0.252), adalimumab (51.6%, 0.176), and etanercept (37.9%, 0.001). Risankizumab had the highest PASI 100 response rate (65.4%), followed by brodalumab (55.7%) and guselkumab (54.8%).ConclusionsIxekizumab, risankizumab, and brodalumab had the highest short-term efficacy, and risankizumab had the highest long-term efficacy.

Project description:IntroductionA growing number of biologics have recently been approved in China for psoriasis treatment, and some of these are eligible for Chinese medical insurance, resulting in a significant increase in the number of patients receiving these biologics. Nevertheless, real-world data on the efficacy and safety of biologics for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Chinese patients are limited, and relevant pharmacoeconomic studies are lacking. Therefore, we performed a prospective, single-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) and secukinumab (SEC) in real-world practice. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was also conducted.MethodsParticipants were enrolled between January 2019 and December 2020 at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Baseline and follow-up assessments were conducted, and an appropriate statistical analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 183 patients were included. At week 12, the number of patients achieving a psoriasis area and severity index reduction of 75% (PASI 75) with SEC treatment was higher than that with ADA and methotrexate (MTX) (SEC versus ADA versus MTX, 90.59% versus 58.70% versus 17.14%, respectively). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 44.83% and 56.36% of patients in the SEC and ADA groups, respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratio in the SEC group was 46,311.83 Chinese yuan(CNY), compared with 17,580.92 CNY in the ADA group.ConclusionIn real-world practice, SEC and ADA are effective and safe for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treatment in Chinese patients. On the basis of drug prices during our study period without considering access to health insurance, ADA was more cost-effective in real-world practice. Adalimumab and secukinumab are two monoclonal antibodies used for the treatment of psoriasis, which target different cytokines in the pathogenesis. A growing number of biologics have recently been approved in China for psoriasis treatment including adalimumab and secukinumab, which are eligible for Chinese medical insurance, resulting in a significant increase in the number of patients receiving these biologics. With the purpose of evaluating its efficacy and safety in the real world, we registered the data of eligible patients in West China Hospital, Sichuan University over the past two years and conducted statistical analysis. In order to provide different therapeutic strategies for patients based on case-specific needs and access to financial resources, we performed pharmacoeconomic analyses to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the two drugs. Our study demonstrated that adalimumab and secukinumab were effective and safe for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Chinese patients in the real-world practice. Based on drug prices during our study period and without taking into consideration access to health insurance, ADA was more cost-effective in real-world practice.

Dataset Information

Safety and efficacy of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A meta-analysis.

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Safety and efficacy of Deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets