Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression level changes of the dynamic gene profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AECOPD) on day1, 3 and 10, compared to the normal people and stable COPD patients. A five chip study using total RNA recovered from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell of Peripheral Blood.Evaluating the dynamic gene profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AECOPD) on day1, 3 and 10 after the hospital admission, to compared with healthy controls or patients with stable COPD. Slides were scanned at 5 μm/pixel resolution using an Axon GenePix 4000B scanner (Molecular Devices Corporation) piloted by GenePix Pro 6.0 software (Axon). Scanned images (TIFF format) were then imported into NimbleScan software (version 2.5) for grid alignment and expression data analysis. Expression data were normalized through quantile normalization and the Robust Multichip Average (RMA) algorithm included in the NimbleScan software. The Probe level (*_norm_RMA.pair) files and Gene level (*_RMA.calls) files were generated after normalization.
Project description:Investigation of whole genome gene expression level changes of the dynamic gene profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with AECOPD) on day1, 3 and 10, compared to the normal people and stable COPD patients.
Project description:BackgroundAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is a clinical syndrome with various causes. It is not uncommon that COPD patients presenting with dyspnea have multiple causes for their symptoms including AECOPD, pneumonia, or congestive heart failure occurring concurrently.MethodsTo identify clinical, radiographic, and laboratory characteristics that might help distinguish AECOPD from another dominant disease in patients with a history of COPD, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with admitting diagnosis of AECOPD who were screened for a prospective randomized controlled trial from Sep 2016 to Mar 2018. Clinical characteristics, course in hospital, and final diagnosis at discharge were reviewed and adjudicated by two authors. The final diagnosis of each patient was determined based on the synthesis of all presenting signs and symptoms, imaging, and laboratory results. We adhered to AECOPD diagnosis definitions based on the GOLD guidelines. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify any associated features of AECOPD with and without other acute processes contributing to dyspnea.ResultsThree hundred fifteen hospitalized patients with admitting diagnosis of AECOPD were included. Mean age was 72.5 (SD 10.6) years. Two thirds (65.4%) had spirometry defined COPD. The most common presenting symptom was dyspnea (96.5%), followed by cough (67.9%), and increased sputum (57.5%). One hundred and eighty (57.1%) had a final diagnosis of AECOPD alone whereas 87 (27.6%) had AECOPD with other conditions and 48 (15.2%) did not have AECOPD after adjudication. Increased sputum purulence (OR 3.35, 95%CI 1.68-6.69) and elevated venous pCO2 (OR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01 - 1.07) were associated with a diagnosis of AECOPD but these were not associated with AECOPD alone without concomitant conditions. Radiographic evidence of pleural effusion (OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.12 - 0.58) was negatively associated with AECOPD with or without other conditions while radiographic evidence of pulmonary edema (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.11 - 0.91) and lobar pneumonia (OR 0.13, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.25) suggested against the diagnosis of AECOPD alone.ConclusionThe study highlighted the complexity and difficulty of AECOPD diagnosis. A more specific clinical tool to diagnose AECOPD is needed.
Project description:BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common respiratory disease globally, characterized by obstructive ventilatory disorder under pulmonary function tests. Recent years have witnessed a yearly increase in the prevalence of COPD.ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of respiratory virus infections on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and to perform sequencing typing and mutation analysis of viruses with high detection rate.MethodsA total of 1523 inpatients with AECOPD admitted to our hospital from April 1,2020 to March 30,2022 were collected and divided into two groups: the infected group (n= 532) and the non-infected group (n= 991). The related indexes between the two groups were collected and compared (including clinical characteristics and laboratory tests that blood cell count, PCT, CRP, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, influenza A virus, influenza B virus, etc.).ResultsIn the infected group, the proportion of patients with palpitations (49.44% VS 8.07%, P< 0.001), lipid metabolism abnormalities (18.42% VS 39.96%, P< 0.001), heart failure (39.85% VS 29.87%, P< 0.001), disease duration (17.48 ± 7.47 VS 12.45 ± 11.43 d, P< 0.001), and poor prognosis (69.55% VS 17.15%, P< 0.001) were higher than those in the non-infected group; Adenovirus (ADV) accounted for 75.94% (404/532) of all infected viruses. 31 virus strains could be categorized into 16 ADV-C1, one ADV-C5, two ADV-B3, three ADV-B7, two ADV-D17, two ADV-D19, and five ADV-D27, which were similar to the serotypes reported in severe pneumonia. Furthermore, three strains of C1 adenovirus were found to be highly homologous to the original strain AF534906 by sequencing, and the phylogenetic trees of the three main structural genes were all on the same branch as the original strain. Base mutations and amino acid variants were found in each structural gene segment. In clinical data, it's found that patients with mutations are worse than those without mutations.ConclusionRespiratory viruses are common in patients with poor prognosis of AECOPD, especially adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus. Respiratory virus infections will lead to the deterioration of patients with AECOPD, accompanied by longer treatment cycles and poor prognosis.
Project description:BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent respiratory condition and a leading cause of mortality, with acute exacerbations (AECOPD) significantly complicating its management and prognosis. Despite the development of various prognostic prediction models for patients with AECOPD, their performance and clinical applicability remain unclear, necessitating a systematic review to evaluate these models and provide guidance for their future improvement and clinical use.MethodPubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and Medline were searched for studies published from their inception until February 5, 2024. Data extraction and evaluation were conducted using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed to assess the risk of bias and applicability of the models.ResultsAfter deduplication and screening 5942 retrieved articles, 46 studies comprising 53 models were included. Of these, 17 (37.0%) studies developed from studies conducted in China. All models were based on cohort studies. Mortality was the predicted outcome in 27 (50.9%) models. Logistic regression was used in 41 (77.4%) models, while machine learning methods were employed in 9 (17.0%) models. The median (minimum, maximum) sample size for model development was 672 (106, 150,035). The median (minimum, maximum) number of predictors per model was 5 (2, 42). Frequently used predictors included age (n = 28), dyspnea severity scores (n = 12), and PaCO2 (n = 11). The pooled AUC was 0.80 for mortality prediction models and 0.84 for hospitalization-related outcomes. 52 models have a high overall risk of bias, and all models were judged to have low concern regarding applicability. Major sources of bias included insufficient sample sizes (83.0%), reliance on univariate analysis for predictor selection (73.6%), inappropriate internal and external validation methods (54.7%), inappropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria for study subjects (50.9%) and so on. The only model with low bias was the PEARL score.ConclusionCurrent prognostic risk prediction models for patients with AECOPD generally exhibit high bias. Future efforts should standardize model development and validation methods, and develop widely usable clinical models.
Project description:Studies have shown that glycerophospholipids are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study adopted targeted metabolomic analysis to investigate the changes in serum glycerophospholipids in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and their differential expression in patients with different inflammatory subtypes. Patients with AECOPD admitted between January 2015 and December 2017 were enrolled, and their clinical data were collected. The patients' gender, age, body mass index, and lung function were recorded. Routine blood and induced sputum tests were performed. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to detect the serum glycerophospholipid metabolic profiles and to analyze the metabolic profile changes between the acute exacerbation and recovery stages as well as the differences between different inflammatory subtypes. A total of 58 patients were hospitalized for AECOPD, including 49 male patients with a mean age of 74.8 ± 10.0 years. In the metabolic profiles, the expression of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) 18:3, lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) 16:1, and phosphatidylinositol (PI) 32:1 was significantly reduced in the acute exacerbation stage compared to the recovery stage (P < 0.05). The three glycerophospholipids were used to plot the receiver operating characteristic curves to predict the acute exacerbation/recovery stage, and the areas under the curves were all above 70%. There were no differential metabolites between the two groups of patients with blood eosinophil percentage (EOS%) ≥2% and <2% at exacerbation. The expression of LPC 18:3, LPE 16:1, and PI 32:1 was significantly reduced in the acute exacerbation stage compared to the recovery stage in the inflammatory subtype with blood EOS <2% (P < 0.05). Abnormalities in the metabolism of glycerophospholipids may be involved in the onset of AECOPD, especially in the non-eosinophilic subtype.
Project description:ObjectiveTo develop a comprehensive framework for selecting outcomes in evaluating the clinical efficacy of Chinese herbal injections and to scientifically select outcomes for the clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Tan-Re-Qing injection intervening AECOPD.MethodsA comprehensive literature review and consensus methods, including focus groups and Delphi surveys, were utilized.ResultsLiterature analysis identified 513 publications, encompassing regulatory guidance, guidelines, expert consensus, and RCTs. Initial dimensions include clinical efficacy, safety, and health economics. Primary outcomes should align with study objectives. Recommended evaluation domains include death, treatment outcome, future impact, quality of life, and safety. Commonly recommended outcomes comprise mortality, arterial blood gases, CAT, exacerbation frequency, adverse events, and lung function. Network meta-analysis identified specific therapeutic efficacy markers (white blood cell count, IL-6, IL-8). Quality of life assessment recommended SF-12, EQ-5D, or CAT. Emphasis on AECOPD frequency and lung function was noted. Delphi survey yielded 41 outcomes across various domains for evaluating Tan-Re-Qing in AECOPD.ConclusionThe findings contribute to developing a robust and reliable trial design for Tan-Re-Qing injection in AECOPD. The methodology employed in this study ensures a systematic and comprehensive approach to the selection of outcomes for the clinical evaluation of future studies in this field.
Project description:Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in serum lipid metabolite profiles and their relationship with clinical characteristics between patients with eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic AECOPD. Methods: A total of 71 AECOPD patients were enrolled. Eosinophilic AECOPD was defined as blood EOS% ≥ 2% (n = 23), while non-eosinophilic AECOPD, as blood EOS< 2% (n = 48). Clinical data were collected, and serum lipid metabolism profiles were detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The XCMS software package was used to pre-process the raw data, and then, lipid metabolite identification was achieved through a spectral match using LipidBlast library. Differences in lipid profiles and clinical features between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups were analyzed by generalized linear regression. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was applied to screen the most characteristic lipid markers for the eosinophilic phenotype. Results: Eosinophilic AECOPD patients had less hypercapnic respiratory failures, less ICU admissions, a shorter length of stay in the hospital, and a lower fibrinogen level. In the lipid metabolism profiles, 32 significantly different lipid metabolites were screened through a t-test adjusted by using FDR (FDR-adjusted p < 0.05 and VIP> 1). Nine differential lipid metabolites were found to be associated with the three clinical features, namely, hypercapnia respiratory failure, ICU admission, and fibrinogen in further integration analysis. The species of triacylglycerol (TAG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), and diacylglyceryl trimethylhomoserine (DGTS) were high in these eosinophilic AECOPD. The LASSO was applied, and three lipid metabolites were retained, namely, LPC (16:0), TAG (17:0/17:2/17:2), and LPC (20:2). The logistic regression model was fitted using these three markers, and the area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.834 (95% CI: 0.740-0.929). Conclusion: Patients with eosinophilic AECOPD had a unique lipid metabolism status. Species of TAGs and LPCs were significantly increased in this phenotype and were associated with better clinical outcomes.
Project description:Objective: Our aim was to systematically investigate the efficacy of Tanreqing (TRQ) injection on in-hospital outcomes among inpatients with frequent or infrequent AECOPD. Methods: In this ongoing, nationwide multicenter registry designed to investigate clinical characteristics, management, and prognoses of Chinese patients admitted for AECOPD in real-world settings, we collected characteristics, comorbidities, in-hospital prognoses, and information on the COPD assessment test (CAT) questionnaire, PEACE questionnaire, and modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire from each enrolled patient. Frequent AECOPD was determined as being admitted to the hospital ≥1 time or visiting the emergency room (ER) ≥ 2 times due to AECOPD within a year. A propensity match method and univariable and multivariable regression models were performed to analyze the efficacy of TRQ on clinical outcomes for inpatients with frequent AECOPD. Results: A total of 4135 inpatients were involved in the analysis, including 868 administered with TRQ and 3267 not administered with TRQ. After propensity score match, among those administered with TRQ, 493 had frequent AECOPD and 358 had infrequent AECOPD. A significant reduction of CAT score at discharge (TRQ median 12, IQR 8.0-16.0; non-TRQ median 13, IQR 9.0-18.0, p = 0.0297), a lower rate of ICU admission (TRQ 0.8% vs. non-TRQ 2.6%, p = 0.0191), and a shorter length of stay (LOS) (TRQ median 11, IQR 9.0-14.0; non-TRQ median 11, IQR 8.0-14.0, p = 0.004) were observed in the TRQ group, compared with the non-TRQ group among frequent AECOPD patients. In the subgroup analysis, for those with a PEACE score >7 on admission, TRQ contributed to a significantly lower CAT score at discharge (p = 0.0084) and a numerically lower ICU admission rate with a marginal statistical significance. Among those with phlegm-heat symptom complex on admission ≥2, a lower CAT score at discharge and a lower ICU admission were also observed in the TRQ group. Conclusion: TRQ injection had better efficacy in patients with frequent AECOPD in reducing ICU admission and alleviating respiratory symptoms, especially for those with higher severity on admission or more phlegm-heat symptoms.