Dataset Information

A Phase 1/2a Study Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF in RSV-seronegative Toddlers Aged 12-24 Months.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes serious illness in children. The Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine candidate was immunogenic with acceptable safety in a phase 1/2a study of RSV-seropositive children. Here, we assessed its safety and immunogenicity in RSV-seronegative children.

Methods

In this randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a study (NCT03606512; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03606512), RSV-seronegative toddlers aged 12-24 months received Ad26.RSV.preF (2.5 × 10¹⁰ viral particles) or placebo on days 1, 29, and 57 (a meningococcal vaccine [Nimenrix] could substitute for day 57 placebo). Primary endpoints were solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs; 7 days after each vaccination), unsolicited AEs (28 days postvaccination), and serious AEs (first vaccination until study end). Participants were monitored for RSV-respiratory tract infection to assess infection rates and for severe RSV-lower respiratory tract infection as an indication of enhanced disease. RSV-A2 neutralizing, RSV (A and B) preF binding, and RSV postF immunoglobulin G-binding antibodies were evaluated on days 1 (predose), 8, and 85, and after RSV season 1.

Results

Thirty-eight participants were enrolled and vaccinated (Ad26.RSV.preF, n = 20; placebo, placebo/Nimenrix, n = 18). Solicited AEs were more common following Ad26.RSV.preF than placebo; most were mild/moderate. No vaccine-related serious AEs were reported. Five of 19 participants receiving Ad26.RSV.preF and 2/18 receiving placebo or placebo/Nimenrix had confirmed RSV-respiratory tract infection or RSV-associated otitis media; none were considered severe. At the final season 1 study visit, most Ad26.RSV.preF recipients had ≥2-fold increases from baseline in RSV-A2 neutralizing, RSV A and B preF binding, and RSV postF antibodies.

Conclusions

Ad26.RSV.preF was well tolerated and immunogenic in RSV-seronegative toddlers.

SUBMITTER: Langley JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11365064 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Phase 1/2a Study Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF in RSV-seronegative Toddlers Aged 12-24 Months.

Langley Joanne M JM Nolan Terry M TM Rämet Mika M Richmond Peter C PC Rosário Filho Nelson N Haazen Wouter W van den Berg Sara P H SPH Williams Kristi K Bastian Arangassery Rosemary AR Omoruyi Edmund E Williams Durkin Joanna J Salisch Nadine N Van Geet Gunter G van Duijnhoven Wilbert W Heijnen Esther E Callendret Benoit B

Open forum infectious diseases 20240808 9

<h4>Background</h4>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes serious illness in children. The Ad26.RSV.preF vaccine candidate was immunogenic with acceptable safety in a phase 1/2a study of RSV-seropositive children. Here, we assessed its safety and immunogenicity in RSV-seronegative children.<h4>Methods</h4>In this randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a study (NCT03606512; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03606512), RSV-seronegative toddlers aged 12-24 months rece ...[more]

PMID: 39220658

Similar Datasets

Project description:UnlabelledDespite substantial morbidity associated with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, there is no licensed vaccine. MEDI-559 is a live attenuated intranasal vaccine candidate being developed for prevention of lower respiratory illness due to RSV in young children. This randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated safety of MEDI-559 in healthy, RSV-seronegative children. MEDI-559 or placebo was administered on 3 occasions, 2 months apart. Primary safety was based on solicited symptoms (SSs) and adverse events (AEs) collected for 28 days after each dose. Nasal wash samples were collected 3 times after each dose (days 7-10, 12-18, 28-34) and at sick visits. Serum was collected for measuring antibody immune responses to RSV prior to first vaccination and 28 days post final dose. Long-term safety was monitored for 365 days from first dose. SSs were mild and frequent (MEDI-559 84%; placebo 91%); most common SSs were runny/stuffy nose, cough, and irritability/fussiness. AEs occurred in 67% MEDI-559 and 57% placebo recipients: most common AE was upper respiratory tract infection (MEDI-559 35%; placebo 23%). Higher incidence of medically attended lower respiratory illness within 28 days after dosing occurred in the MEDI-559 arm compared to placebo (none associated with vaccine virus shedding). There was no evidence of enhanced RSV disease. Vaccine virus was detected only in MEDI-559 recipients; shedding occurred in 56%subjects, primarily post dose 1. A functional immune response was observed in 59% and 9% MEDI-559 and placebo recipients, respectively, by an RSV microneutralization assay. Vaccine take, assessed by proportion that shed vaccine-type virus or had a seroresponse against RSV, was seen in 95% MEDI-559 subjects. MEDI-559 is therefore biologically active and immunogenic in this seronegative pediatric population. Although the frequency of SSs and AEs was not considered clinically significant, the increase in medically attended lower respiratory illnesses in the vaccine group warrants expanded safety studies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00767416.

Project description:Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause serious lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) among older adults. There is no licensed RSV vaccine. In CYPRESS (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b proof-of concept trial; NCT03982199), an Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine demonstrated 80.0% efficacy for prevention of RSV LRTD and 69.8% efficacy for prevention of any RSV acute respiratory infection in adults aged ≥65 years through the first RSV season. This study evaluated the durability of immune responses elicited by Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein after two RSV seasons (up to 1.5 years post-vaccination) in the overall study population and in groups of participants stratified by age and risk level for severe RSV LRTD. Methods Participants (N=5782) were randomized 1:1 to receive vaccine or placebo before the RSV season. The primary endpoint was first occurrence of RSV LRTD. RSV A2 virus neutralizing antibodies (VNAs; through Day 365), RSV preF binding antibodies (through Day 533), and RSV-F–specific IFN-γ enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot; through Day 533), were evaluated in an immunogenicity subset (n=195; ages 65–74 years: n=141; 75–84 years: n=47; ≥85 years: n=6; increased risk [chronic heart or lung disease]: n=48; non-increased risk: n=147). Results In the vaccine group of the immunogenicity subset, RSV A2 VNAs peaked at Day 15 and were maintained at 2.8-fold over baseline at 1 year. Similarly, RSV preF-specific binding antibodies peaked at Day 15 and were maintained at 2.1-fold above baseline at 1.5 years. Median RSV-F–specific IFN-γ T-cell frequency increased from 34 spot-forming cells (SFC)/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline to 143 SFC/106 PBMCs at 1.5 years. Comparable immune responses were observed in age/risk subgroups. No relevant changes were observed in the placebo group at any time point. Pre-existing Ad26 VNAs did not appear to impact RSV-specific immune response durability. Conclusion Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine was efficacious and elicited robust, durable (to at least 1.5 years) humoral and cellular immune responses in adults aged ≥65 years, older participants (≥75 years), and in participants with increased risk for severe RSV LRTD. Disclosures Christy A. Comeaux, MD, PhD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.: Employee Ann R. Falsey, MD, BioFire Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Merck Sharp & Dohme: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Kristi Williams, PhD, Janssen Research and Development: Employee John E. Ervin, MD, The Alliance for Multispecialty Research – KCM: Contractual agreement for conduct of study protocol Arangassery R. Bastian, PhD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV: Employee Joris Menten, PhD, Janssen Infectious Diseases: Employee Els De Paepe, MSc, Janssen Infectious Diseases: employee Sjouke Vandenberghe, PhD, Janssen Infectious Diseases: Employee Eric K. H. Chan, PhD, Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employee Jerald Sadoff, MD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV: Employee Macaya Douoguih, MD, MPH, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.: Employee Benoit Callendret, PhD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.: Employee Esther Heijnen, MD, PhD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.: Employee.

Project description:(1) Background: Food-based dietary guidelines promote population health and well-being through dietary patterns that reduce chronic disease risk while providing adequate energy and nutrients. In Australia, recommended dietary patterns based on servings per day from the five food groups—fruits, vegetables, cereals and grains, meats and alternatives, and dairy—have been developed for toddlers 1–2 years of age. However, no study has assessed the intake of the five food groups in this age group nationally. (2) Aim: To compare daily servings and the percentage of energy from the five food groups and discretionary foods in toddlers 1–2 years old to the Australian Dietary Guidelines. (3) Methods: Dietary intake was assessed using a one-day food record for 475 toddlers. (4) Results: Apart from fruit and dairy, servings of the five food groups were below the recommendations. Two-thirds of toddlers did not consume enough vegetables, and only 10% consumed the recommended number of servings for cereals and grains. On average, toddlers consumed only half the recommended servings of meat and alternatives. Nearly all toddlers (89%) consumed discretionary foods, which accounted for ~12% of total energy. Forty-five percent of toddlers received breastmilk. On average, breastfed toddlers consumed fewer servings from the five food groups than non-breastfed toddlers. Dairy contributed 20% of daily energy in all toddlers; however, this food group accounted for 13% in breastfed and 32% in non-breastfed toddlers on the day of the food record. (4) Conclusions: Compared to the recommendations, alignment with the servings of the five food group foods was not achieved by most toddlers, except for fruit and dairy. Discretionary foods may have displaced nutritious family foods. Consistent with Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines, many toddlers in this study continued to receive breastmilk but the recommended dietary patterns do not include breastmilk. Dietary modeling, including breastmilk as the primary milk source, is urgently needed, along with practical advice on incorporating breastmilk in a toddler’s diet while optimizing food consumption.

Project description:BackgroundDevelopment and deployment of an effective malaria vaccine would complement existing malaria control measures. A blood stage malaria vaccine candidate, Merozoite Surface Protein-3 (MSP3), produced as a long synthetic peptide, has been shown to be safe in non-immune and semi-immune adults. A phase Ib dose-escalating study was conducted to assess the vaccine's safety and immunogenicity in children aged 12 to 24 months in Korogwe, Tanzania (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00469651).MethodsThis was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, dose escalation phase Ib trial, in which children were given one of two different doses of the MSP3 antigen (15 microg or 30 microg) or a control vaccine (Engerix B). Children were randomly allocated either to the MSP3 candidate malaria vaccine or the control vaccine administered at a schedule of 0, 1, and 2 months. Immunization with lower and higher doses was staggered for safety reasons starting with the lower dose. The primary endpoint was safety and reactogenicity within 28 days post-vaccination. Blood samples were obtained at different time points to measure immunological responses. Results are presented up to 84 days post-vaccination.ResultsA total of 45 children were enrolled, 15 in each of the two MSP3 dose groups and 15 in the Engerix B group. There were no important differences in reactogenicity between the two MSP3 groups and Engerix B. Grade 3 adverse events were infrequent; only five were detected throughout the study, all of which were transient and resolved without sequelae. No serious adverse event reported was considered to be related to MSP3 vaccine. Both MSP3 dose regimens elicited strong cytophilic IgG responses (subclasses IgG1 and IgG3), the isotypes involved in the monocyte-dependant mechanism of Plasmodium falciparum parasite-killing. The titers reached are similar to those from African adults having reached a state of premunition. Furthermore, vaccination induced seroconversion in all vaccinees.ConclusionThe MSP3 malaria vaccine candidate was safe, well tolerated and immunogenic in children aged 12-24 months living in a malaria endemic community. Given the vaccine's safety and its induction of cytophilic IgG responses, its efficacy against P. falciparum infection and disease needs to be evaluated in Phase 2 studies.

Dataset Information

A Phase 1/2a Study Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF in RSV-seronegative Toddlers Aged 12-24 Months.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A Phase 1/2a Study Evaluating Safety and Immunogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF in RSV-seronegative Toddlers Aged 12-24 Months.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets