Dataset Information

The effectiveness of intratympanic injections with methylPREDnisolon versus placebo in the treatment of vertigo attacks in MENiere's disease (PREDMEN trial): a study protocol for a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Intratympanic corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of Menière's disease (MD). However, few and small randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of intratympanic corticosteroids have been performed. A recent Cochrane review suggested that a well-conducted placebo-controlled RCT with a large study population is required to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of intratympanic corticosteroids in MD. The following protocol describes a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of methylprednisolone (62.5 mg/mL) to a placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%).

Methods and analysis

We aim to recruit 148 patients with unilateral MD from six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the methylprednisolone or the placebo group. Two injections will be given, one at baseline and one after 2 weeks. Follow-up assessments will be done at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be the frequency of vertigo attacks. Attacks will be evaluated daily with the DizzyQuest app. Secondary outcomes include hearing loss, tinnitus, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and escape medication, (serious) adverse events and cost-effectiveness. These will be evaluated with audiometry and multiple commonly used, validated questionnaires. For the primary and secondary outcomes mixed model analysis, generalised estimating equation analysis and logistic regression analysis will be used.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was submitted via the Clinical Trials Information System, reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft and the local institutional review board of each participating centre. All data will be presented ensuring the integrity and anonymity of patients. Results will be published in scientific journals and presented on (inter)national conferences.

Trial registration number

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System, with the registration ID: NCT05851508.

SUBMITTER: Boreel MME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11367374 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The effectiveness of intratympanic injections with methylPREDnisolon versus placebo in the treatment of vertigo attacks in MENière's disease (PREDMEN trial): a study protocol for a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Boreel Maud Martina Emilie MME van Esch Babette B Schermer Tjard R TR Mol Berber M BM van Benthem Peter Paul PP Bruintjes Tjasse D TD

BMJ open 20240829 8

<h4>Introduction</h4>Intratympanic corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of Menière's disease (MD). However, few and small randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of intratympanic corticosteroids have been performed. A recent Cochrane review suggested that a well-conducted placebo-controlled RCT with a large study population is required to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of intratympanic corticosteroids in MD. The following protocol describes a phase-3 multicen ...[more]

PMID: 39209781

Similar Datasets

Project description:Gentamicin is used as a therapeutic agent for Ménière's disease because of its vestibulotoxicity causing chemo-ablation of the vestibular sensory epithelia. Its use has increased in recent years. However, there is still no consensus about the dose regimen of gentamicin in the treatment of Ménière's disease. In this study two different dose regimen treatment protocols are compared in a placebo controlled study design. The primary objective is to quantify the treatment effect on dizziness, the secondary objective is hearing evaluation.We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with unilateral Ménière's disease according to the AAO-HNS guidelines resistant to conservative medication. Three groups received four injections, administered weekly (four intratympanic injections with 40 mg/mL gentamicin solution, two injections gentamicin solution and two injections of placebo in random order, or four injections with placebo). Outcome measures were the score on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and pure tone audiometry (PTA). Intended follow-up was 2 years.During follow-up one patient exceeded the accepted amount of hearing loss. Further, enrollment was very slow (until 12 months between two patients) and new insights showed an apparent benefit of intratympanic gentamicin treatment (ITG). Therefore we performed an unscheduled interim analysis which showed that PTA threshold shifts reached the stopping criteria in two more patients. Because of this, this study was ended. Of the three patients with the significant PTA threshold shift two were enrolled in the gentamicin group.No conclusions can be drawn concerning doses regimens. Now that new publications have shown that ITG treatment can be an effective and safe treatment, a placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial may not pass the ethical committee because of these recent reports in literature. Still, a dose regimen study (without placebo) on ITG treatment needs to be performed.This trial was registered in The University Medical Center Utrecht/ Gelre hospital Apeldoorn. Protocol ID: 07/343, EudraCT number 2006-005913-37.

Project description:IntroductionA novel coronavirus, designated SARS-CoV-2, caused an international outbreak of a respiratory illness, termed COVID-19 in December 2019. There is a lack of specific therapeutic agents based on evidence for this novel coronavirus infection; however, several medications have been evaluated as a potential therapy. Therapy is required to treat symptomatic patients and decrease the virus carriage duration to limit the communitytransmission.Methods and analysisWe hypothesise that patients with mild COVID-19 treated with favipiravir will have a shorter duration of time to virus clearance than the control group. The primary outcome is to evaluate the effect of favipiravir on the timing of the PCR test conversion from positive to negative within 15 days after starting the medicine.Adults (>18 years, men or nonpregnant women, diagnosed with mild COVID-19 within 5 days of disease onset) are being recruited by physicians participating from the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs and the Ministry of Health ethics committee approved primary healthcare centres. This double-blind, randomised trial comprises three significant parts: screening, treatment and a follow-up period. The treating physician and patients are blinded. Eligible participants are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the therapy group (favipiravir) or a control group (placebo) with 1800 mg by mouth two times per day for the first day, followed by 800 mg two times per day for 4-7 days. Serial nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples are obtained on day 1 (5 days before therapy). On day5±1 day, 10±1 day, 15±2 days, extra nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal PCR COVID-19 samples are requested.The primary analysis population for evaluating both the efficacy and safety outcomes will be a modified intention to treat population. Anticipating a 10% dropout rate, we expect to recruit 288 subjects per arm. The results assume that the hazard ratio is constant throughout the study and that the Cox proportional hazard regression is used to analyse the data.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre Institutional Review Board (28 April 2020) and the Ministry of Health Institutional Review Board (1 July 2020). Protocol details and any amendments will be reported to https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04464408. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNational Clinical Trial Registry (NCT04464408).

Project description:IntroductionBenign recurrent vertigo (BRV), Menière's disease (MD), and vestibular migraine (VM) show many similarities with regard to the course of vertigo attacks and clinical features. In this paper, we elaborate on the decreasing frequency of vertigo attacks observed in a previous study from our group by exploring changes in the duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in patients with BRV, MD, or VM.MethodsFor this 3-year prospective cohort study in our tertiary referral center we recruited patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BRV, MD, or VM by a neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist in our center in 2015-2016. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess the usual duration of vertigo attacks and their potential triggers every 6 months. Main outcome measures were changes in duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in the subgroups of patients with persisting attacks, which were analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression models.Results121 patients were included (BRV: n = 44; MD: n = 43; VM: n = 34) of whom 117 completed the 3-year follow-up period and 57 (48.7%) kept reporting vertigo attacks at one more follow-up measurements. None of the diagnosis groups showed statistically significant shortening of attack duration at the subsequent annual follow-up measurements compared to baseline. At baseline, stress and fatigue being reported as triggers for attacks differed significantly between the three groups (stress: BRV 40.9%, MD 62.8%, VM 76.5%, p = 0.005; fatigue: BRV 31.0%, MD 48.8%, VM 68.8%, p = 0.003). In the VM group, a consistent reduction of stress and fatigue as triggers was observed up until the 24- and the 30-month follow-up measurements, respectively, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0.15 to 0.33 (all p < 0.05). In the MD group, a consistent reduction of head movements as trigger was observed from the 24-month measurement onward (ORs ranging from 0.07 to 0.11, all p < 0.05).ConclusionOur study showed no reduction in vertigo attack duration over time in patients with BRV, MD, and VM who remain to have vertigo attacks. In VM and MD patients with persisting vertigo attacks stress, fatigue and head movements became less predominant triggers for vertigo attacks.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy of intratympanic OTO-104 for the treatment of Ménière's disease.Study designsThree randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies of OTO-104 in patients with Ménière's disease.SettingThe United States and throughout Europe.PatientsIndividuals with Ménière's disease aged 18 to 85 years.InterventionsAll three studies were conducted according to a similar protocol, whereby after a 1-month lead-in period, eligible patients received a single intratympanic injection of either 12 mg OTO-104 (otic formulation of dexamethasone in thermosensitive poloxamer) or placebo (1:1) and were observed for 3 months.Main outcome measuresThe primary efficacy endpoint was measured by the number of definitive vertigo days (DVDs) at month 3. Secondary objective was OTO-104 safety and tolerability including adverse events, audiometry, tympanometry, and otoscopic examinations.ResultsAlthough OTO-104 demonstrated numerically greater reductions in DVD compared with placebo across all three studies, statistical significance versus placebo (primary efficacy endpoint) was only achieved in one study, the AVERTS-2 study (n = 174, p = 0.029). Secondary vertigo efficacy endpoints were statistically significant at month 3 in that study including vertigo severity, the effect of vertigo on daily activity (days at home sick or bedridden), and vertigo frequency. In the AVERTS-1 study, which did not meet the primary endpoint, a subgroup analysis of the 115 patients (69.7% of study population) who did not previously receive intratympanic steroid injections demonstrated that OTO-104 patients had significantly lower mean DVD at month 3 than patients receiving placebo (1.9 for OTO-104 versus 3.0 for placebo; p = 0.045). Importantly, a significant placebo response was observed across studies in Ménière's disease patients. OTO-104 and the intratympanic injection procedure were well tolerated.ConclusionsIn all three high-quality, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter studies, a single intratympanic injection of 12 mg OTO-104 demonstrated numerically greater reductions in vertigo versus placebo in patients with Ménière's disease, but statistical separation from placebo was demonstrated in only one of the studies. OTO-104 was safe and well tolerated.(Otonomy, Inc. funded; NCT02717442, NCT02612337, NCT03664674).

Project description:IntroductionSubarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm carries high morbidity and mortality. Despite huge advances in techniques to secure the aneurysm, there has been little progress in the treatment of the deleterious effects of the haemorrhage.Sulforaphane is an Nrf2 inducer with anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It has been shown to improve clinical outcome in experimental models of SAH, but is unstable. SFX-01 (Evgen Pharma) is a novel composition comprised of synthetic sulforaphane stabilised within an α-cyclodextrin complex. On ingestion, the complex releases sulforaphane making SFX-01 an ideal vehicle for delivery of sulforaphane.Methods and analysisThe objective of the study is to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of SFX-01. This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients aged 18-80 years with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the previous 48 hours. 90 patients will be randomised to receive SFX-01 (300 mg) or placebo two times per day for up to 28 days.Safety will be assessed using blood tests and adverse event reporting.Pharmacokinetics will be assessed based on paired blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sulforaphane levels on day 7. A subgroup will have hourly samples taken during 6 hours post-dosing on days 1 and 7. Pharmacodynamics will be assessed by haptoglobin and malondialdehyde levels, and maximum flow velocity of middle cerebral artery will be measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound.Clinical outcomes will be assessed at days 28, 90 and 180 with modified Rankin Scale, Glasgow Outcome Score, SAH Outcome Tool, Short Form-36, Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome Scales and Check List for Cognitive and Emotional consequences following stroke. MRI at 6 months including quantitative susceptibility mapping and volumetric T1 will measure iron deposition and cortical volume.Safety, CSF sulforaphane concentration and middle cerebral artery flow velocity will be primary outcomes and all others secondary.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from South Central Hampshire A committee. Outcomes of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT02614742.

Project description:BackgroundApnoea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses among preterm infants. AOP often leads to hypoxemia and bradycardia which are associated with an increased risk of death or disability. In addition to caffeine therapy and non-invasive respiratory support, doxapram might be used to reduce hypoxemic episodes and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants, thereby possibly improving their long-term outcome. However, high-quality trials on doxapram are lacking. The DOXA-trial therefore aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of doxapram compared to placebo in reducing the composite outcome of death or severe disability at 18 to 24 months corrected age.MethodsThe DOXA-trial is a double blinded, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada. A total of 396 preterm infants with a gestational age below 29 weeks, suffering from AOP unresponsive to non-invasive respiratory support and caffeine will be randomized to receive doxapram therapy or placebo. The primary outcome is death or severe disability, defined as cognitive delay, cerebral palsy, severe hearing loss, or bilateral blindness, at 18-24 months corrected age. Secondary outcomes are short-term neonatal morbidity, including duration of mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and necrotising enterocolitis, hospital mortality, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics and cost-effectiveness. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat principle.DiscussionDoxapram has the potential to improve neonatal outcomes by improving respiration, but the safety concerns need to be weighed against the potential risks of invasive mechanical ventilation. It is unknown if the use of doxapram improves the long-term outcome. This forms the clinical equipoise of the current trial. This international, multicentre trial will provide the needed high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of doxapram in the treatment of AOP in preterm infants.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04430790 and EUDRACT 2019-003666-41. Prospectively registered on respectively June and January 2020.

Project description:BackgroundEvidence suggests a role for excessive inflammation in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an oral anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis, and coronary disease. We aimed to investigate the effect of colchicine on the composite of COVID-19-related death or hospital admission.MethodsThe present study is a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, adaptive, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The study was done in Brazil, Canada, Greece, South Africa, Spain, and the USA, and was led by the Montreal Heart Institute. Patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by PCR testing or clinical criteria who were not being treated in hospital were eligible if they were at least 40 years old and had at least one high-risk characteristic. The randomisation list was computer-generated by an unmasked biostatistician, and masked randomisation was centralised and done electronically through an automated interactive web-response system. The allocation sequence was unstratified and used a 1:1 ratio with a blocking schema and block sizes of six. Patients were randomly assigned to receive orally administered colchicine (0·5 mg twice per day for 3 days and then once per day for 27 days thereafter) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospital admission for COVID-19. Vital status at the end of the study was available for 97·9% of patients. The analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The COLCORONA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04322682) and is now closed to new participants.FindingsTrial enrolment began in March 23, 2020, and was completed in Dec 22, 2020. A total of 4488 patients (53·9% women; median age 54·0 years, IQR 47·0-61·0) were enrolled and 2235 patients were randomly assigned to colchicine and 2253 to placebo. The primary endpoint occurred in 104 (4·7%) of 2235 patients in the colchicine group and 131 (5·8%) of 2253 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 0·79, 95·1% CI 0·61-1·03; p=0·081). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 96 (4·6%) of 2075 patients in the colchicine group and 126 (6·0%) of 2084 patients in the placebo group (OR 0·75, 0·57-0·99; p=0·042). Serious adverse events were reported in 108 (4·9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 139 (6·3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0·051); pneumonia occurred in 63 (2·9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 92 (4·1%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0·021). Diarrhoea was reported in 300 (13·7%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 161 (7·3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p<0·0001).InterpretationIn community-treated patients including those without a mandatory diagnostic test, the effect of colchicine on COVID-19-related clinical events was not statistically significant. Among patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, colchicine led to a lower rate of the composite of death or hospital admission than placebo. Given the absence of orally administered therapies to prevent COVID-19 complications in community-treated patients and the benefit of colchicine in patients with PCR-proven COVID-19, this safe and inexpensive anti-inflammatory agent could be considered for use in those at risk of complications. Notwithstanding these considerations, replication in other studies of PCR-positive community-treated patients is recommended.FundingThe Government of Quebec, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health, the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation, the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, the Rudin Family Foundation, and philanthropist Sophie Desmarais.

Project description:IntroductionEmerging evidence has shown that an antibiotic first strategy is a viable treatment option for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). Although there has recently been an interest and increase in the use of antibiotics as the primary strategy for treating uncomplicated AA, there is no consensus regarding the optimum antibiotic regimen. In particular, the long-term outcomes of different antibiotic regimens, such as the recurrence rate, still lack evidence. Given that the flora of the appendix is mainly anaerobic bacteria, we hypothesised that antianaerobe regimens could decrease the recurrence rate compared with those that did not include antianaerobic antibiotics.Methods and analysisThe OPTIMA(Optimising the treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis) trial is a multicentre, double-blinded placebo-controlled superiority randomised study aimed to evaluate the role of antianaerobic antibiotics in the resolution of uncomplicated AA. Patients (18-65 years) with uncomplicated AA (without gangrenous, perforated appendicitis, appendiceal abscess, or appendiceal fecaliths) are eligible for inclusion. The primary endpoint of this study is the success rate of the treatment, defined as the resolution of AA resulting in discharge from the hospital without surgical intervention and recurrent symptoms within one year. Secondary endpoints include mortality, postintervention complications, recurrent symptoms up to one year after treatment, hospital stay, sick leave, treatment cost, pain symptom scores and quality of life. Data are reported as the number of cases (%), median (range) and relative risk, which will be analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test or χ2 test, as appropriate. P-value<0.05 will be considered significant.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinling Hospital on 13 November 2018 (2018NZKY-027-01). The trial findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberChiCTR1800018896.