Dataset Information

Effect of rosuvastatin on outcomes in chronic haemodialysis patients - design and rationale of the AURORA study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of cardiovascular events. Multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis are present in ESRD and may contribute to the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in this population. In contrast to patients with normal renal function, the benefits of modifying lipid levels on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ESRD on haemodialysis have yet to be confirmed in large prospective randomised trials. A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events (AURORA) will be the first large-scale international trial to assess the effects of statin therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in ESRD patients on chronic haemodialysis.

Methods

More than 2,750 ESRD patients who have been receiving chronic haemodialysis treatment for at least 3 months have been randomised (1:1), irrespective of baseline lipid levels, to treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg or placebo. The primary study endpoint is the time to a major cardiovascular event (first occurrence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke). Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular event-free survival time, time to cardiovascular death, time to non-cardiovascular death, cardiovascular interventions, tolerability of treatment and health economic costs per life-year saved. Study medication will be given until 620 subjects have experienced a major cardiovascular event.

Conclusion

Our hypothesis is that results from AURORA will establish the clinical efficacy and tolerability of rosuvastatin in patients with ESRD receiving chronic haemodialysis and guide the optimal management of this expanding population.

SUBMITTER: Fellstrom B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1175096 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPatients with end-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance haemodialysis treatment experience a dramatic cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Due to the high atherosclerotic and arteriosclerotic burden and profound alterations in haemostasis, they frequently suffer and die from both thromboembolic and bleeding events. This is a particular concern in patients on haemodialysis with atrial fibrillation (AF). Controlled trials on the optimal anticoagulation in patients with AF on haemodialysis are not available. The randomised controlled phase IIIb AXADIA-AFNET 8 trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban in patients with AF requiring haemodialysis.Methods and analysisA total of 222 patients will be randomised in an open-labelled, 1:1 design to receive either apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonist therapy (target international normalised ratio 2.0-3.0). All patients will be treated and followed up for a minimum of 6 months up to a maximum of 24 months. The primary outcome is major or clinically relevant, non-major bleedings or death of any cause. Secondary outcomes include stroke, cardiovascular death and other thromboembolic events, thus exploring the efficacy of apixaban. The first patient was randomised in June 2017.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Landesaertzekammer, Westfalen-Lippe and the Medical Faculty of the University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany (reference number: 2016-598 f-A). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients prior to study participation, including their consent for long-term follow-up. AXADIA-AFNET 8 is an investigator-initiated trial. Sponsor is AFNET, Muenster, Germany. Study findings will be disseminated to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Munich, Germany, and Pfizer, Berlin, Germany, to the participating centres, at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numbersNCT02933697,Pre-results.

Project description:IntroductionPatients with kidney failure receiving chronic haemodialysis have elevated risk of arrhythmias potentially increasing the likelihood of sudden cardiac death, stroke and hospitalisation. The DIALIZE study (NCT03303521) demonstrated that sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) was an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for predialysis hyperkalaemia in patients undergoing haemodialysis. The DIALIZE-Outcomes study evaluates the effect of SZC on sudden cardiac death and arrhythmia-related cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving chronic haemodialysis with recurrent hyperkalaemia.Methods and analysisInternational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 357 study sites across 25 countries. Adults (≥18 years) receiving chronic haemodialysis three times per week with recurrent predialysis serum potassium (K+) ≥5.5 mmol/L post long interdialytic interval (LIDI) are eligible. Patients (~2800) will be randomised 1:1 to SZC or placebo, starting at 5 g orally once daily on non-dialysis days and titrated weekly in 5 g increments (maximum 15 g) to target predialysis serum K+ 4.0-5.0 mmol/L post LIDI. The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy of SZC versus placebo in reducing occurrence of the primary composite endpoint of sudden cardiac death, stroke or arrhythmia-related hospitalisation, intervention or emergency department visit. Secondary endpoints include efficacy of SZC versus placebo in maintaining normokalaemia (serum K+ 4.0-5.5 mmol/L post LIDI) at the 12-month visit, preventing severe hyperkalaemia (serum K+ ≥6.5 mmol/L post LIDI) at the 12-month visit and reducing the incidence of individual cardiovascular outcomes. Safety of SZC will be evaluated. The study is event driven, with participants remaining in the study until 770 primary endpoint events have occurred. Average time in the study is expected to be ~25 months.Ethics and disseminationApproval was obtained from the relevant institutional review board/independent ethics committee from each participating site (approving bodies in supplementary information). The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numbersEudraCT 2020-005561-14 and clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04847232.

Project description:BackgroundFrailty, characterized by vulnerability, reduced reserves and increased susceptibility to severe events, is a significant concern in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients. Sarcopenia, corresponding to the progressive loss of muscle mass and strength, may contribute to frailty by reducing functional capacity, mobility and autonomy. However, consensus lacks on the optimal bedside frailty index for chronic HD patients. This study investigated the influence of frailty on chronic HD patient survival and explored the associated factors.MethodsA total of 135 patients were enrolled from January to April 2019 and then followed up prospectively until April 2022. At inclusion, frailty was assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) tests including gait speed, standing balance and lower limb muscle strength.ResultsFrom a total of 114 prevalent chronic HD patients (66% men, age 67.6 ± 15.1 years), 30 died during the follow-up period of 23.7 months (range 16.8-34.3). Deceased patients were older, had more comorbidities and a higher sarcopenia prevalence (P < .05). The TUG and SPPB test scores were significantly reduced in patients who had died [SPPB total score: 7.2 ± 3.3 versus 9.4 ± 2.5; TUG time 8.7 ± 5.8 versus 13.8 ± 10.5 (P < .05)]. Multivariate analysis showed that a higher SPPB score (total value >9) was associated with a lower mortality risk [hazard ratio 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92); P < .03). Each component of the SPPB test was also associated with mortality in univariate analysis, but only the SPPB balance test remained protective against mortality in multivariate analysis. Older age, lower handgrip strength and lower protein catabolic rate were associated with SPPB total scores <9, SPPB balance score and TUG time >10 s.ConclusionsScreening for frailty is crucial in chronic HD patients, and incorporating SPPB, especially the balance test, provides valuable insights. Diminished muscle strength and inadequate protein intake negatively influence the SPPB score and balance in chronic HD patients. Effective identification and management of frailty can therefore improve outcomes.Clinical trial registration clinicaltrialsgovNCT03845452.