Dataset Information

Assessment of the relationship between pre-chip and post-chip quality measures for Affymetrix GeneChip expression data.

ABSTRACT: Gene expression microarray experiments are expensive to conduct and guidelines for acceptable quality control at intermediate steps before and after the samples are hybridised to chips are vague. We conducted an experiment hybridising RNA from human brain to 117 U133A Affymetrix GeneChips and used these data to explore the relationship between 4 pre-chip variables and 22 post-chip outcomes and quality control measures.We found that the pre-chip variables were significantly correlated with each other but that this correlation was strongest between measures of RNA quality and cRNA yield. Post-mortem interval was negatively correlated with these variables. Four principal components, reflecting array outliers, array adjustment, hybridisation noise and RNA integrity, explain about 75% of the total post-chip measure variability. Two significant canonical correlations existed between the pre-chip and post-chip variables, derived from MAS 5.0, dChip and the Bioconductor packages affy and affyPLM. The strongest (CANCOR 0.838, p < 0.0001) correlated RNA integrity and yield with post chip quality control (QC) measures indexing 3'/5' RNA ratios, bias or scaling of the chip and scaling of the variability of the signal across the chip. Post-mortem interval was relatively unimportant. We also found that the RNA integrity number (RIN) could be moderately well predicted by post-chip measures B_ACTIN35, GAPDH35 and SF.We have found that the post-chip variables having the strongest association with quantities measurable before hybridisation are those reflecting RNA integrity. Other aspects of quality, such as noise measures (reflecting the execution of the assay) or measures reflecting data quality (outlier status and array adjustment variables) are not well predicted by the variables we were able to determine ahead of time. There could be other variables measurable pre-hybridisation which may be better associated with expression data quality measures. Uncovering such connections could create savings on costly microarray experiments by eliminating poor samples before hybridisation.

SUBMITTER: Jones L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1524996 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessment of the relationship between pre-chip and post-chip quality measures for Affymetrix GeneChip expression data.

Jones Lesley L Goldstein Darlene R DR Hughes Gareth G Strand Andrew D AD Collin Francois F Dunnett Stephen B SB Kooperberg Charles C Aragaki Aaron A Olson James M JM Augood Sarah J SJ Faull Richard L M RL Luthi-Carter Ruth R Moskvina Valentina V Hodges Angela K AK

BMC bioinformatics 20060419

<h4>Background</h4>Gene expression microarray experiments are expensive to conduct and guidelines for acceptable quality control at intermediate steps before and after the samples are hybridised to chips are vague. We conducted an experiment hybridising RNA from human brain to 117 U133A Affymetrix GeneChips and used these data to explore the relationship between 4 pre-chip variables and 22 post-chip outcomes and quality control measures.<h4>Results</h4>We found that the pre-chip variables were s ...[more]

PMID: 16623940

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMicroarray experiments rely on several critical steps that may introduce biases and uncertainty in downstream analyses. These steps include mRNA sample extraction, amplification and labelling, hybridization, and scanning causing chip-specific systematic variations on the raw intensity level. Also the chosen array-type and the up-to-dateness of the genomic information probed on the chip affect the quality of the expression measures. In the accompanying publication we presented theory and algorithm of the so-called hook method which aims at correcting expression data for systematic biases using a series of new chip characteristics.ResultsIn this publication we summarize the essential chip characteristics provided by this method, analyze special benchmark experiments to estimate transcript related expression measures and illustrate the potency of the method to detect and to quantify the quality of a particular hybridization. It is shown that our single-chip approach provides expression measures responding linearly on changes of the transcript concentration over three orders of magnitude. In addition, the method calculates a detection call judging the relation between the signal and the detection limit of the particular measurement. The performance of the method in the context of different chip generations and probe set assignments is illustrated. The hook method characterizes the RNA-quality in terms of the 3'/5'-amplification bias and the sample-specific calling rate. We show that the proper judgement of these effects requires the disentanglement of non-specific and specific hybridization which, otherwise, can lead to misinterpretations of expression changes. The consequences of modifying probe/target interactions by either changing the labelling protocol or by substituting RNA by DNA targets are demonstrated.ConclusionThe single-chip based hook-method provides accurate expression estimates and chip-summary characteristics using the natural metrics given by the hybridization reaction with the potency to develop new standards for microarray quality control and calibration.

Project description:BackgroundWith the development of new drug combinations and targeted treatments for multiple types of cancer, the ability to stratify categories of patient populations and to develop companion diagnostics has become increasingly important. A panel of 325 RNA biomarkers was selected based on cancer-related biological processes of healthy cells and gene expression changes over time during nonmalignant epithelial cell organization. This "cancer in reverse" approach resulted in a panel of biomarkers relevant for at least 7 cancer types, providing gene expression profiles representing key cellular signaling pathways beyond mutations in "driver genes." Objective. To further investigate this biomarker panel, the objective of the current study is to (1) validate the assay reproducibility for the 325 RNA biomarkers and (2) compare gene expression profiles side by side using two technology platforms.Methods and resultsWe have mapped the 325 RNA transcripts and in a custom NanoString nCounter expression panel to be compared to all potential probe sets in the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0. The experiments were conducted with 10 unique biological formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tumor samples. Each site extracted RNA from four sections of 10-micron thick FFPE tissue over three different days by two different operators using an optimized standard operating procedure and quality control criteria. Samples were analyzed using mas5 in BioConductor and NanoStringNorm in R. Pearson correlation showed reproducibility between sites for all 60 samples with r = 0.995 for Affymetrix and r = 0.999 for NanoString. Correlation in multiple days and multiple users was for Affymetrix r = (0.962 - 0.999) and for NanoString r = (0.982 - 0.991).ConclusionThe 325 RNA biomarkers showed reproducibility in two technology platforms with moderate to high concordance. Future directions include performing clinical validation studies and generating rationale for patient selection in clinical trials using the technically validated assay.

Dataset Information

Assessment of the relationship between pre-chip and post-chip quality measures for Affymetrix GeneChip expression data.

Publications

Assessment of the relationship between pre-chip and post-chip quality measures for Affymetrix GeneChip expression data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets