Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A randomized controlled trial of a psychoeducational group program for unipolar depression in adults in Norway (NCT00319540).


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Coping with Depression Course (CWD) has shown to be effective in the treatment of depression. However, there are very few randomized controlled trials on unipolar depression in adults. AIMS:To test the effect of a modified CWD on unipolar depression in a randomized controlled trial design in adults. METHODS:Participants were recruited through mass media, tested by BDI and clinical interview, and randomized into intervention group (N = 81) and control group (N = 74). The program was mainly conducted by nurses with background in psychiatry and primary health care, and the intervention encompassed 8 weekly sessions of 2 1/2 hours, with 3 booster sessions. RESULTS:By "intention-to-treat" analysis a statistically significant effect on depressive symptoms at follow up at 6 months was found, and the level of symptoms was sustained after 12 months. CONCLUSION:The study shows that the intervention is effective in the treatment of unipolar depression, and suitable for specialized psychiatric services as well as primary health care.

SUBMITTER: Dalgard OS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1538590 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A randomized controlled trial of a psychoeducational group program for unipolar depression in adults in Norway (NCT00319540).

Dalgard Odd Steffen OS  

Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH 20060628


<h4>Background</h4>Coping with Depression Course (CWD) has shown to be effective in the treatment of depression. However, there are very few randomized controlled trials on unipolar depression in adults.<h4>Aims</h4>To test the effect of a modified CWD on unipolar depression in a randomized controlled trial design in adults.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants were recruited through mass media, tested by BDI and clinical interview, and randomized into intervention group (N = 81) and control group (N = 7  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4650332 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10252280 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2518035 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3551665 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6784998 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4468784 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7561374 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6066443 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5237273 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2803110 | biostudies-literature