Dataset Information

Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration.

ABSTRACT: Habitat fragmentation is a ubiquitous by-product of human activities that can alter the genetic structure of natural populations, with potentially deleterious effects on population persistence and evolutionary potential. When habitat fragmentation results in the subdivision of a population, random genetic drift then leads to the erosion of genetic diversity from within the resulting subpopulation, random genetic drift then leads to the erosion of genetic diversity from within the resulting subpopulations and greater genetic divergence among them. Theoretical and simulation analyses predict that these two main genetic effects of fragmentation, greater differentiation among resulting subpopulation and reduced genetic diversity within them, will proceed at very different rates. Despite important implications for the interpretation of genetics data from fragmented populations, empirical evidence for this phenomenon has been lacking. In this analysis, we carry out an empirical study in population of an alpine meadow-dwelling butterfly, which have become fragmented increasing forest cover over five decades. We show that genetic differentiation among subpopulations (G(ST)) is most highly correlated with contemporary forest cover, while genetics diversity within subpopulation (expected heterozygosity) is better correlated with the spatial pattern of forest cover 40 years in the past. Thus, where habitat fragmentation has occurred in recent decades, genetic differentiation among subpopulation can be near equilibrium while contemporary measures of within subpopulation diversity may substantially overestimate the equilibrium values that will eventually be attained.

SUBMITTER: Keyghobadi N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1578708 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration.

Keyghobadi Nusha N Roland Jens J Matter Stephen F SF Strobeck Curtis C

Proceedings. Biological sciences 20050301 1562

Habitat fragmentation is a ubiquitous by-product of human activities that can alter the genetic structure of natural populations, with potentially deleterious effects on population persistence and evolutionary potential. When habitat fragmentation results in the subdivision of a population, random genetic drift then leads to the erosion of genetic diversity from within the resulting subpopulation, random genetic drift then leads to the erosion of genetic diversity from within the resulting subpo ...[more]

PMID: 15799951

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Research on use of foraging patches has focused on why herbivores visit or quit patches, yet little is known about visits to patches over time. Food quality, as reflected by higher nutritional quality and lower plant defenses, and physical patch characteristics, which offer protection from predators and weather, affect patch use and hence should influence their revisitation. Due to the potentially high costs of moving between patches, fragmented habitats are predicted to complicate foraging decisions of many animals. We aimed to determine how food quality, shelter availability and habitat fragmentation influence tree reuse by a specialist folivore, the koala, in a fragmented agricultural landscape. We GPS-tracked 23 koalas in northern New South Wales, Australia and collated number of revisits, average residence time, and average time-to-return to each tree. We measured tree characteristics including food quality (foliar nitrogen and toxic formylated phloroglucinol compounds, FPCs concentrations), tree size, and tree connectedness. We also modeled the costs of locomotion between trees. Koalas re-visited isolated trees with high leaf nitrogen disproportionately often. They spent longer time in trees with high leaf nitrogen, and in large trees used for shelter. They took longer to return to trees with low leaf nitrogen. Tree connectivity reduced travel costs between patches, being either individual or groups of trees. FPC levels had no detectable effect on patch revisitation. We conclude that food quality and shelter drive koala tree re-visits. Scattered, isolated trees with nutrient-rich leaves are valuable resource patches for koalas despite movement costs to reach them. We GPS-tracked Australia’s iconic koalas within a fragmented agricultural landscape to determine why they would return to the same trees or groups of trees. We found that they selected trees with high nitrogen, and larger trees that provided shelter from the heat. This often involved moving large distances across a hostile cleared landscape. Hence, scattered trees on farms, especially when the trees are of high quality, are essential for arboreal animals.

Dataset Information

Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration.

Publications

Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets