Dataset Information

Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass?

ABSTRACT: Energetically costly behaviours, such as flight, push physiological systems to their limits requiring metabolic rates (MR) that are highly elevated above the resting MR (RMR). Both RMR and MR during exercise (e.g. flight or running) in birds and mammals scale allometrically, although there is little consensus about the underlying mechanisms or the scaling relationships themselves. Even less is known about the allometric scaling of RMR and MR during exercise in insects. We analysed data on the resting and flight MR (FMR) of over 50 insect species that fly to determine whether RMR and FMR scale allometrically. RMR scaled with body mass to the power of 0.66 (M0.66), whereas FMR scaled with M1.10. Further analysis suggested that FMR scaled with two separate relationships; insects weighing less than 10mg had fourfold lower FMR than predicted from the scaling of FMR in insects weighing more than 10mg, although both groups scaled with M0.86. The scaling exponents of RMR and FMR in insects were not significantly different from those of birds and mammals, suggesting that they might be determined by similar factors. We argue that low FMR in small insects suggests these insects may be making considerable energy savings during flight, which could be extremely important for the physiology and evolution of insect flight.

SUBMITTER: Niven JE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1617160 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass?

Niven Jeremy E JE Scharlemann Jörn P W JP

Biology letters 20050901 3

Energetically costly behaviours, such as flight, push physiological systems to their limits requiring metabolic rates (MR) that are highly elevated above the resting MR (RMR). Both RMR and MR during exercise (e.g. flight or running) in birds and mammals scale allometrically, although there is little consensus about the underlying mechanisms or the scaling relationships themselves. Even less is known about the allometric scaling of RMR and MR during exercise in insects. We analysed data on the re ...[more]

PMID: 17148203

Similar Datasets

Project description:Natural decision-making often involves extended decision sequences in response to variable stimuli with complex structure. As an example, many animals follow odor plumes to locate food sources or mates, but turbulence breaks up the advected odor signal into intermittent filaments and puffs. This scenario provides an opportunity to ask how animals use sparse, instantaneous, and stochastic signal encounters to generate goal-oriented behavioral sequences. Here we examined the trajectories of flying fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) and mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti) navigating in controlled plumes of attractive odorants. While it is known that mean odor-triggered flight responses are dominated by upwind turns, individual responses are highly variable. We asked whether deviations from mean responses depended on specific features of odor encounters, and found that odor-triggered turns were slightly but significantly modulated by two features of odor encounters. First, encounters with higher concentrations triggered stronger upwind turns. Second, encounters occurring later in a sequence triggered weaker upwind turns. To contextualize the latter history dependence theoretically, we examined trajectories simulated from three normative tracking strategies. We found that neither a purely reactive strategy nor a strategy in which the tracker learned the plume centerline over time captured the observed history dependence. In contrast, "infotaxis", in which flight decisions maximized expected information gain about source location, exhibited a history dependence aligned in sign with the data, though much larger in magnitude. These findings suggest that while true plume tracking is dominated by a reactive odor response it might also involve a history-dependent modulation of responses consistent with the accumulation of information about a source over multi-encounter timescales. This suggests that short-term memory processes modulating decision sequences may play a role in natural plume tracking.

Project description:Background/objectivesExercise is a front-line countermeasure used to maintain astronaut health during long-duration spaceflight; however, reductions in metabolic health still occur. Accordingly, we evaluated serial changes in metabolic parameters in a spaceflight analog and evaluated the efficacy of exercise with or without the addition of low-dose testosterone treatment on mitigating adverse metabolic changes.Subjects/methodsHealthy young (<55 years) men were randomly assigned to one of three groups during 70-days of strict, diet controlled, 6° head-down bed rest: Control (CON, n=9), exercise plus testosterone countermeasure (TEX, n=8), or exercise countermeasure plus placebo (PEX, n=9). Basal metabolic rate (BMR), glucose tolerance, and insulin sensitivity were measured before, during, and after bed rest. Exercise energy expenditure and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption were measured in TEX and PEX subjects during bed rest.ResultsLeptin decreased during bed rest (Pre to BR+0 changed from 6.9 ± 5.1, 5.8 ± 4.2, and 4.7 ± 4.1 to 7.9 ±3.6, 6.5 ± 4.6, and 4.1 ±3.0 ug• L-1 for CON, PEX, and TEX respectively). Bed rest induced a decrease in BMR (Pre to BR57 changed from 1655 ± 212, 1629 ± 108, and 1706 ± 146 to 1476 ± 166, 1668 ± 142, and 1603 ± 132 kcal • day-1 ± 95%CI for CON, PEX, and TEX respectively). Similarly, bed rest negatively affected glucose metabolism assessed by 2hr OGTT glucose (Pre to BR66 changed from 6.29 ± 0.72, 5.13 ± 0.72, and 5.87 ± 0.73 to 6.62 ± 0.72, 5.83 ± 0.72, and 7.08 ± 0.72 mmol • L-1 ± 95%CI). Reambulation following bed rest positively affected glucose tolerance in CON (2hr OGTT glucose at BR+12: 5.3 ± 0.72, 6.42 ± 0.73, and 6.04 ± 0.73 mmol • L-1 ± 95%CI). Testosterone protected against bed rest induced insulin resistance (HOMA-IR from Pre to BR+66 changed from 1.74 ± 0.54, 1.18 ± 0.55, and 1.45 ± 0.56 to 2.24 ± 0.56, 1.47 ± 0.54, and 1.07 ± 0.54).ConclusionThis study confirmed that inactivity during 70 days of head-down bed rest adversely affects metabolic health. The daily exercise countermeasures were beneficial but not completely protective of bed rest induced decrements in metabolic health. Supplementary countermeasures such as testosterone may provide additional benefits not provided by exercise alone.

Dataset Information

Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass?

Publications

Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets