Dataset Information

Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The reported accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies widely. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of TBNA for mediastinal staging in NSCLC.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and the bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched for studies evaluating TBNA accuracy with no language restriction. Meta-analytical methods were used to construct summary receiver-operating characteristic curves and to pool sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, including six studies that surgically confirmed all TBNA results and enrolled at least 10 patients with and without mediastinal metastasis (tier 1). Methodological quality varied but did not affect diagnostic accuracy. In tier 1 studies the median prevalence of mediastinal metastasis was 34%. Using a random effects model, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 39% (95% CI 17 to 61) and 99% (95% CI 96 to 100), respectively. Compared with tier 1 studies, the median prevalence of mediastinal metastasis (81%; p = 0.002) and pooled sensitivity (78%; 95% CI 71 to 84; p = 0.009) were higher in non-tier 1 studies. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the sensitivity of TBNA depends critically on the prevalence of mediastinal metastasis. The pooled major complication rate was 0.3% (95% CI 0.01 to 4).

Conclusions

When properly performed, TBNA is highly specific for identifying mediastinal metastasis in patients with NSCLC, but sensitivity depends critically on the study methods and patient population. In populations with a lower prevalence of mediastinal metastasis, the sensitivity of TBNA is much lower than reported in recent lung cancer guidelines.

SUBMITTER: Holty JE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1747236 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Holty J-E C JE Kuschner W G WG Gould M K MK

Thorax 20050630 11

<h4>Background</h4>The reported accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies widely. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of TBNA for mediastinal staging in NSCLC.<h4>Methods</h4>Medline, Embase, and the bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched for studies evaluating TBNA accuracy with no language restriction. Meta-analytical methods were used to construct summary receiver-operating characteris ...[more]

PMID: 15994251

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEndobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided mediastinal/hilar cryobiopsy (MedCryoBx) is a relatively new modality, being combined with EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) to improve yield in the diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the diagnostic yield of MedCryoBx versus EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic adenopathy.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search using Google Scholar, Embase, and PubMed/MEDLINE for studies about a diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy using MedCryoBx and EBUS-TBNA. Two authors separately reviewed studies for inherent bias using the Quality Assessment Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Inverse Variance weighting for random effects methodology was used for meta-analysis. Pooled diagnostic yields overall and for subgroups were estimated. Complications of MedCryoBx were reviewed.ResultsTen studies with 844 patients undergoing either biopsy procedure were in the final analysis. A total of 554 patients underwent MedCryoBx and 704 patients EBUS-TBNA. Meta-analysis showed a pooled diagnostic yield of 91% (504 of 554) for MedCryoBx and 81% (567 of 704) for EBUS-TBNA, with odds ratio (OR) of 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6 to 3.91; P<0.001], with I2 of 20%. Subgroup analysis for benign conditions showed increased diagnostic yield with OR of 7.95 (91% MedCryoBx versus 58% EBUS-TBNA, P<0.001) with an I2 of 25%. Subgroup analysis for lymphoma showed a statistically significant increase in pooled diagnostic yield with OR of 11.48 (87% MedCryoBx versus 29% EBUS-TBNA, P=0.001). Mild bleeding (36.5%) without any intervention was the most common complication. Bleeding requiring intervention (0.7%) was noted in patients. Pneumothorax (0.4%) and pneumomediastinum (0.4%) were less common in this analysis.ConclusionsMedCryoBx is a very promising tool for the diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy. It has improved diagnostic yield over EBUS-TBNA in benign and possibly lymphoproliferative diseases, but less so in lung cancer. The complication rates with MedCryoBx are comparable to EBUS-TBNA.

Project description:BackgroundThe current preferred approach for surgical mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma is video-assisted mediastinoscopy. An alternative technique in which lymph nodes are resected instead of biopsied is video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) that is suggested to be superior in detecting N2 disease. Yet, evidence is conflicting and furthermore limited by sample size. The objective was to compare mediastinal staging through VAMLA and video-assisted mediastinoscopy.MethodsA single-center cohort study was conducted. All consecutive patients that underwent surgical mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma by VAMLA (2011 to 2018) were compared to historic video-assisted mediastinoscopy controls (2007 to 2011). Patients with negative surgical mediastinal staging underwent subsequent anatomical resection with systematic regional lymphadenectomy. Primary outcome was the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting N2 disease.ResultsTwo-hundred-sixty-nine video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomies and 118 video-assisted mediastinoscopies were performed. The prevalence of N2 disease was 20% and 26% respectively in the VAMLA and video-assisted mediastinoscopy group, while the rate of unforeseen pN2 resulting from lymph node dissection during anatomical resection was 4% and 11%, respectively. Invasive staging using VAMLA demonstrated superior sensitivity of 0.82 and a negative predictive value of 0.96 when compared to video-assisted mediastinoscopy (0.62 and 0.89, respectively), offering a 64% decrease in risk of unforeseen pN2 following anatomical resection. However, VAMLA is also associated with a 75% risk increase on complications (P=0.36).ConclusionsWe conclude that performing invasive mediastinal lymph node assessment for staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma, VAMLA should be the preferred technique with superior sensitivity and negative predictive value in detecting N2 disease. Though, VAMLA is also associated with an increased risk of complications.

Dataset Information

Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets