Project description:BackgroundIntravenous thrombolysis is an established treatment to improve functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. However, various acute central nervous system dysfunctions can mimic stroke, where thrombolytic therapy may provide no benefit and carries potential risks. The ability to accurately distinguish stroke mimics vs stroke by telemedicine evaluation is uncertain. This study aims to identify clinical predictors of stroke mimics in patients evaluated via telemedicine for suspected ischemic stroke and treated with thrombolytics.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of patients treated with thrombolytics for suspected acute ischemic stroke via telemedicine at Southern Illinois Healthcare between 2017 and 2024. Data on demographics, past medical history, clinical presentation, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), stroke metrics, and laboratory values were collected. Final diagnoses were categorized as cerebrovascular disease (CD), including acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, and stroke mimic (SM). Outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition.ResultsOf 171 patients treated with thrombolytics via telemedicine, 128 (75%) were diagnosed with CD, and 43 (25%) were SM, with toxic-metabolic encephalopathy being the most common mimic (40%, n = 17). Adjusted forward logistic regression showed age (OR: 0.957, 95% CI: 0.931-0.984, P = .002) and NIHSS (OR: 1.098, 95% CI: 1.032-1.168, P = .003) remained independently associated with SM. The predictive TeleStroke Mimic was score performed with c-statistic of 0.61. SM had shorter median LOS (3 [2-3] vs 3 [2-6], P < .01) and higher rate of discharge home (86% vs 55%, P < .01).ConclusionsIn our population, younger age and higher NIHSS were associated with higher odds of SM diagnosis in patients treated with telemedicine-administered thrombolytics. These variables are insufficient to reliably identify a subgroup of patients evaluated via telemedicine for whom thrombolytics could be withheld. The poor performance of Telestroke Mimic score highlights the need for improved predictive tools. Until larger studies are conducted, telemedicine-administered thrombolytics should adhere to current in-person guidelines.
Project description:BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend withholding antithrombotic therapy (ATT) for at least 24 h in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytic therapy. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis of a single-centre experience on the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy (ATT) started before or after 24 h of intravenous thrombolysis in a cohort of acute ischemic stroke patients.MethodsA total of 139 patients (Rapid ATT group) received antithrombotic therapy before 24 h of thrombolysis, and 33 patients (Standard ATT group) after 24 h. The brain parenchyma and vessel status were assessed using simple CT scan on admission, multimodal CT scan at the end of thrombolysis, and angio-CT/MRI scan at day 3. Functional outcome was scored using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at day 90.ResultsThe two ATT groups had similar demographics, stroke subtypes, baseline NIHSS, thrombolytic strategies, vessel-patency rates at the end of thrombolysis, and incidence of bleeding complications at follow up. At day 3, the Rapid ATT group had a non-significant improved vessel-patency rate than the Standard ATT group. At day 90, a greater proportion of patients in the rapid ATT group had shifted down the mRS, and had improved in the NIHSS score.ConclusionsATT initiated before 24 h of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke patients disclosed no safety concerns compared with a conventional antithrombotic therapy delay of 24 h and showed better functional outcome at follow up. The value of early initiation of ATT after thrombolysis deserves further assessment in randomized controlled trials.
Project description:We present a case of cerebral embolism associated with a left atrial myxoma that was treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy. A 79-year-old right-handed man with no history of neurological or psychiatric illnesses was referred to our hospital because of confusion. He had been self-supported in the activity of daily living and could enjoy gardening until just before his admission. He had aphasia, left conjugate deviation, right hemiparesis, and right pathological reflexes. His NIHSS score was 24. Cranial DWI showed hyperintense lesions in the left middle cerebral artery territory, and MRA revealed left middle cerebral artery occlusion. We started treatment with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase intravenously 3 h after the onset. However, the therapy was ineffective, and the NIHSS score was 25 on the second day. A transthoracic echocardiogram and heart MRI showed a left atrial myxoma. However, surgery was contraindicated because of the patient's poor general condition. Although intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is a reasonable treatment for stroke patients, even with a cardiac myxoma, we cannot always expect good effects, especially if the emboli are parts of the tumor itself. In this case, we could not perform an endovascular mechanical embolectomy; however, we speculate that mechanical embolus retrieval in cerebral ischemia might be effective in such cases.
Project description:We report what we believe is the 1st case in the medical literature in which an intravenous thrombolytic agent was used successfully--without massive intracranial bleeding--to treat acute stroke induced by atrial myxoma. Our patient, who had biatrial myxomas with a dual blood supply from the right coronary artery, presented with cerebral ischemia. Transesophageal echocardiography was essential in clarifying the diagnosis and in helping to direct surgical treatment.
Project description:BackgroundSpecific clinical risk factors may contribute to improving or worsening neurological functions in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients pre-treated with a combined cholesterol reducer and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) therapy. In this study, clinical risk factors associated with good or poor presenting neurological symptoms in ischemic stroke patients with prior cholesterol reducer use, specifically a statin and rtPA therapy was investigated.MethodsRetrospective data for baseline clinical and demographic data for patients with AIS taking cholesterol reducers prior to rtPA treatment from January 2010 to June 2016 in a regional stroke center was analyzed. Improving (NIHSS score ≤ 7) or worsening (NIHSS score > 7) of neurologic functions were the determined measures of treatment outcome. Multivariate logistic regression models identified demographic and clinical factors associated with worsening or improving neurologic functions.ResultsAdjusted multivariate analysis showed that in an AIS population with a combined rtPA and cholesterol reducer medication history, increasing age (OR = 1.032, 95% CI, 1.015-1.048, P < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.859, 95% CI, 1.098-3.149, P = 0.021) demonstrated a likely association with worsening neurologic functions, while direct admission (OR = 0.411, 95% CI, 0.246-0.686, P = 0.001) and being Caucasian (OR = 0.496, 95% CI, 0.297-0.827, P = 0.007) showed an association with improving or progressing neurologic functions.ConclusionA prior cholesterol reducer, namely a statin, plus rtPA combination may be associated with worsening neurological function for elderly AIS patients with atrial fibrillation, while Caucasians directly admitted to a neurology unit are more likely to show an association with progress or improvements in neurologic functions. While combining statin with rtPA treatment may facilitate worsening neurologic functions in elderly AIS patients with atrial fibrillation, they should not be denied of this therapy. The decision to combine statin and rtPA for AIS patients with atrial fibrillation can be done after clinical stabilization following appropriate clinical management.
Project description:ObjectiveClozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment refractory people with schizophrenia, yet many patients only partially respond. Accumulating preclinical and clinical data suggest benefits with minocycline. We tested adjunct minocycline to clozapine in a 10-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Primary outcomes tested were positive, and cognitive symptoms, while avolition, anxiety/depression, and negative symptoms were secondary outcomes.MethodsSchizophrenia and schizoaffective participants (n = 52) with persistent positive symptoms were randomized to receive adjunct minocycline (100 mg oral capsule twice daily; n = 29) or placebo (n = 23).ResultsBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) psychosis factor (P = 0.098; effect size [ES], 0.39) and BPRS total score (P = 0.075; ES, 0.55) were not significant. A change in total BPRS symptoms of more than or equal to 30% was observed in 7 (25%) of 28 among minocycline and 1 (4%) of 23 among placebo participants, respectively (P = 0.044). Global cognitive function (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery) did not differ, although there was a significant variation in size of treatment effects among cognitive domains (P = 0.03), with significant improvement in working memory favoring minocycline (P = 0.023; ES, 0.41). The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total score did not differ, but significant improvement in avolition with minocycline was noted (P = 0.012; ES, 0.34). Significant improvement in the BPRS anxiety/depression factor was observed with minocycline (P = 0.028; ES, 0.49). Minocycline was well tolerated with significantly fewer headaches and constipation compared with placebo.ConclusionsMinocycline's effect on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score and positive symptoms were not statistically significant. Significant improvements with minocycline were seen in working memory, avolition, and anxiety/depressive symptoms in a chronic population with persistent symptoms. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.
Project description:Background and Purpose- Dual antiplatelet treatment poses a risk for increased hemorrhagic transformation (HT) following intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. The aim of this study was to implement a model of experimental stroke with tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)-associated HT in mice on dual antiplatelet treatment to enable mechanistic studies and also to allow for an initial assessment of therapeutic approaches to limit HT. Methods- Male C57BL6 mice were fed with Aspirin and Clopidogrel via drinking water for 3 days. Subsequently, mice were subjected to 2-hour transient middle cerebral artery occlusion, and tPA was infused when indicated. HT was quantified by measuring hemorrhaged areas in brain sections with ImageJ. TTC staining was used to determine infarct size. Platelet function was tested in vitro using flow cytometry and in vivo with standard tail bleeding tests. Results- Both flow cytometry and tail bleeding volumes indicated significantly reduced platelet function following Aspirin and Clopidogrel treatment. While tPA administered 2 hours after onset of middle cerebral artery occlusion did not cause bleeding in control mice (0.51±0.13 mm2), HT significantly increased by 18.9±5.4 mm2 (P=0.0045) in Aspirin and Clopidogrel mice treated with tPA. HT in aspirin and clopidogrel mice not treated with tPA was nonsignificantly elevated by 8.0±4.6 mm2 (P=0.3784) compared with controls. Infarct sizes did not differ between groups. The HT persisted when the tPA dosage was reduced. Conclusions- We successfully established a translational stroke model of tPA treatment under dual antiplatelet treatment. The impaired platelet function led to an increased risk for HT in tPA-treated mice. Reducing the dosage of tPA did not prevent this hemorrhagic complication.