Dataset Information

Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Physician-initiated advance care planning is desirable, effective, and routinely indicated for competent adult patients, but doctors are often reluctant to begin the necessary conversations.

Objective

To determine whether patients are willing and able to designate a surrogate for medical decision making, when asked to do so as part of routine medical inquiry.

Design, patients, measurements

A survey asking patients to name a health care agent was designed and administered in the context of routine clinical care. Participants were drawn from a consecutive sample of 309 competent adult outpatients. Data were analyzed using ordinary descriptive statistics.

Results

Two hundred ninety-eight of 309 patients (response rate, 96%) completed the survey and were willing and able to specify a proxy for health care. One third of married participants did not choose their spouse as proxy.

Conclusions

Asking patients to identify a surrogate for medical decision making opens the door for ongoing individualized medical care planning in the context of ordinary patient-physician interaction. This approach is applicable to all competent adults. Documenting proxy choice protects a patient's wishes and preferences until more definitive planning is accomplished.

SUBMITTER: Lipkin KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1831656 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry.

Lipkin K Michael KM

Journal of general internal medicine 20061101 11

<h4>Background</h4>Physician-initiated advance care planning is desirable, effective, and routinely indicated for competent adult patients, but doctors are often reluctant to begin the necessary conversations.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether patients are willing and able to designate a surrogate for medical decision making, when asked to do so as part of routine medical inquiry.<h4>Design, patients, measurements</h4>A survey asking patients to name a health care agent was designed and admi ...[more]

PMID: 16879418

Similar Datasets

Project description:CONTEXT:There is need for a short validated self-report instrument for assessing the feeling of being loved. The Feeling Loved instrument asks: "Do you feel loved?" and "How loved do you feel?" as well as "Do you love yourself?" and "How much do you love yourself?" with 100 mm visual analogue scales assessing the continuous response options. OBJECTIVE:To assess convergent and discriminant validity and to explore psychometric structure for this novel self-report measure. DESIGN:Convergent validity comparators include: general mental health, perceived social support, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and positive/negative emotion. Discriminant validity comparators include: gender, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and body mass index. Latent class analysis techniques explore psychometric structure. SETTING:Baseline evaluation for a randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS:Community-recruited adults in Madison, Wisconsin. INTERVENTION:This validation study is based on pre-intervention data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Strength of correlation with comparators is used to assess convergence and discrimination. Goodness-of-fit indicators assess latent class models. RESULTS:Of n?=?412 respondents, 92% answered positively to both Yes/No questions, and 59% self-rated ?75/100 on both 0-to-100 VAS scales. Supporting convergent validity, highly significant (p < 0.001) Spearman's rho=? correlations of a summed Feeling Loved score were: mental health (??=?0.49); social support (??=?0.46); perceived stress (??=?-0.46), depressive symptoms (??=?-0.31), and both positive (??=?0.50) and negative (??=?-0.43) emotion. Significant associations were also found for personality indicators. Supporting discriminant validity, Feeling Loved scores did not correlate significantly with physical health (??=?-0.08), body mass index (??=?0.01), age (??=?0.06), or income (??=?0.07) (p values all ? 0.12). Latent class analysis models suggested a 3-class structure, with strong goodness-of-fit indicators.

Project description:ObjectivesIn routine psychiatric care in Stockholm, Sweden, a comprehensive therapist-guided intervention for clinically significant health anxiety is implemented. However, there is a need for more easily accessible self-care interventions to improve treatment dissemination. This study aimed to transform an existing therapist-guided digital intervention into a self-care intervention, reducing patient burden and used clinical resources while maintaining quality and safety.DesignAn uncontrolled feasibility study.SettingConducted at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Sweden, with nationwide recruitment trough online advertisements.ParticipantsTwenty-five adults used the self-care intervention and underwent telephone assessments, along with completing self-rated questionnaires.InterventionThe newly developed 8-week self-care intervention was designed to be user-friendly without therapist guidance, and to facilitate high levels of behavioural engagement.Primary and secondary outcome measuresIndicators of quality and safety, including changes in health anxiety severity (primary), clinician time, participant adherence, perceived credibility/satisfaction with the intervention and adverse events, were benchmarked against a previous study of the more comprehensive intervention it was based on.ResultsCompared with the original guided intervention, the self-care intervention was condensed in terms of text (up to 70% less reading), duration (8 weeks instead of 12) and number of exercises. Quality indicators were similar to the original version. Most participants worked actively with core components in the self-care intervention. Within-group effects on health anxiety from pretreatment to the 3-month follow-up were large (g=1.37; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.00). No serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThis brief digital self-care intervention shows potential for increasing access to treatment for individuals with health anxiety while reducing the burden on patients and clinical resources. Future studies should investigate the optimal type of intervention and support for different individuals, and if non-inferiority can be established.Trial registration numberNCT05446766.

Project description:BackgroundCOVID-19 restrictions and fear dramatically changed the use of medical care. Understanding the magnitude of cancelled and postponed appointments and associated factors can help identify approaches to mitigate unmet need.ObjectiveTo determine the proportion of medical visits cancelled or postponed and for whom. We hypothesized that adults with serious medical conditions and those with higher anxiety, depressive symptoms, and avoidance-oriented coping would have more cancellations/postponements.DesignFour nationally representative cross-sectional surveys conducted online in May, July, October, and December 2020.Participants59,747 US adults who completed 15-min online surveys. 69% cooperation rate.MeasuresPhysical and mental health visits and cancer screening cancelled or postponed over prior 2 months. Plan to cancel or postpone visits over the next 2 months. Relationship with demographics, medical conditions, local COVID-19 death rate, anxiety, depressive symptoms, coping, intolerance of uncertainty, and perceived COVID-19 risk.Key resultsOf the 58% (N = 34,868) with a medical appointment during the 2 months before the survey, 64% had an appointment cancelled or postponed in May, decreasing to 37% in December. Of the 41% of respondents with scheduled cancer screening, 20% cancelled/postponed, which was stable May to December. People with more medical conditions were more likely to cancel or postpone medical visits (OR 1.19 per condition, 95% CI 1.16, 1.22) and cancer screening (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15, 1.24). Race, ethnicity, and income had weak associations with cancelled/postponed visits, local death rate was unrelated, but anxiety and depressive symptoms were strongly related to cancellations, and this grew between May and December.ConclusionsCancelled medical care and cancer screening were more common among persons with medical conditions, anxiety and depression, even after accounting for COVID-19 deaths. Outreach and support to ensure that patients are not avoiding needed care due to anxiety, depression and inaccurate perceptions of risk will be important.

Project description:Purpose: A qualitative inquiry was conducted to investigate the qualification requirements of medical doctors in different professional fields and from different perspectives. The inquiry was part of an empirical workplace analysis. Methods: Seventy-four structured interviews were conducted and analyzed to examine critical incidents and behaviors of medical doctors working in different professional fields (clinical theory, clinical practice, practitioner) and disciplines, and from three different perspectives (medical doctors, non-medical staff, and patients). In addition, the National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Medical Education (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin / NKLM) was used. Results: The results revealed eleven relevant competencies, which could be categorized into three superordinate competence clusters: interpersonal, work-related, and self-related. The perspectives of medical doctors and non-medical staff included all eleven competencies. However, the perspective of patients did not include one interpersonal and two self-related competencies. Nearly all of the critical behaviors mentioned are included in the NKLM. However, the NKLM also includes behaviors that were not mentioned in the interviews. Conclusions: The behavior-oriented interviews resulted in a requirement profile that is very similar in structure to other competency models in occupational contexts. Comparisons of the different perspectives predominantly revealed similarities. However, the patient perspective also revealed interesting differences compared to the perspectives of medical doctors and non-medical staff. The behavior-related results of the interviews can be directly used for the development of exercises in selection and personnel development contexts and for potential appraisals specific to different medical disciplines. In future steps, the results of this initial qualitative step are to be replicated and extended using quantitative studies and a representative sample. The main overall objective is the definition of relevant competencies both for the selection and development of medical students and for the design of potential appraisals as part of personnel development programs in different medical disciplines.

Dataset Information

Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry.

Background

Objective

Design, patients, measurements

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Brief report: identifying a proxy for health care as part of routine medical inquiry.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets