Dataset Information

Effect of left ventricular endocardial activation pattern on echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To explore the left ventricular (LV) electrical activation pattern in heart failure (HF) and its implication to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Design and setting

Observational study at the University Teaching Hospital.

Patients

23 optimally treated patients with HF with New York Heart Association class III, QRS duration >120 ms and LV ejection fraction <35%.

Interventions

The LV endocardial activation pattern and total activation time (Tat) was determined by non-contact mapping and the LV mechanical dys-synchrony was determined by standard deviation (Ts-SD) and maximal difference (Ts-diff) of time to peak systolic contraction (Ts) among 12 LV segments using tissue Doppler imaging before receiving CRT.

Main outcome measures

Correlation between electrical and mechanical dys-synchrony; volumetric responder to CRT at 3 months; HF hospitalisation or death by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

Homogenous (type I, n = 8) and presence of conduction block (type II, n = 15) patterns were identified. Significant correlation between Tat and Ts-SD/Ts-diff was noted only in type II (r = 0.73/0.56, p = 0.002/0.03). Ts-SD and Ts-diff in type II were significantly longer than type I. 12 patients in type II and 2 in type I were CRT responders (p = 0.01). After 487 (447) days, patients with type II pattern had significantly lower risk of HF hospitalisation or death than those with type I (log rank chi(2) = 5.25; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Patients with type II LV endocardial activation pattern had a more favourable echocardiographic and clinical response to CRT than those with type I pattern.

SUBMITTER: Fung JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1861475 | biostudies-literature | 2007 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of left ventricular endocardial activation pattern on echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Fung Jeffrey W H JW Chan Joseph Y S JY Yip Gabriel W K GW Chan Hamish C K HC Chan Winnie W L WW Zhang Qing Q Yu Cheuk-Man CM

Heart (British Cardiac Society) 20070119 4

<h4>Objective</h4>To explore the left ventricular (LV) electrical activation pattern in heart failure (HF) and its implication to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).<h4>Design and setting</h4>Observational study at the University Teaching Hospital.<h4>Patients</h4>23 optimally treated patients with HF with New York Heart Association class III, QRS duration >120 ms and LV ejection fraction <35%.<h4>Interventions</h4>The LV endocardial activation pattern and total activation time (Tat) was de ...[more]

PMID: 17237127

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsA waiting period of more than 3 months is recommended for patients before undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, due to an anticipated high mortality rate, early implementation of CRT might be beneficial for some patients. We aimed to evaluate the rate and the probability of left ventricular (LV) function improvement and their predictors in patients with heart failure (HF) with indications for CRT.Methods and resultsFrom March 2011 to February 2014, a total of 5625 hospitalized patients for acute HF were consecutively enrolled in 10 tertiary hospitals. Among them, we analysed 1792 patients (mean age 63.96 ± 15.42 years, female 63.1%) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% at the baseline echocardiography and divided them into three groups: 144 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), 136 with wide QRS complexes without LBBB, and 1512 not having these findings (control). We compared and analysed these three groups for improvement of LV function at follow-up echocardiography. In patients who met CRT indications (patients with LBBB or wide QRS complexes without LBBB), logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for no improvement of LV. No improvement of LV was defined as LVEF ≤ 35% at follow-up echocardiography or the composite adverse outcomes: death, heart transplantation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or use of a ventricular assist device before follow-up echocardiography. A classification tree was established using the binary recursive partitioning method to predict the outcome of patients who met CRT indications. In a median follow-up of 11 months, LVEF improvement was observed in 24.3%, 15.4%, and 40.5% of patients with LBBB, wide QRS complexes without LBBB, and control, respectively. Patients meeting CRT indications had higher 3 month mortality rates than the control (24.6% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.002). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that large LV end-systolic dimension [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.15, P < 0.001], low LVEF (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, P = 0.006), diabetes requiring insulin (OR 6.49, 95% CI 2.53-19.33, P < 0.001), and suboptimal medical therapy (OR 6.85, 95% CI 3.21-15.87, P < 0.001) were significant factors predictive of no improvement. A decision tree analysis was consistent with these results.ConclusionsPatients with CRT indications had higher mortality during their follow-up compared with control. LV function improvement was rare in this population, especially when they had some risk factors. These results suggest that the uniform waiting period before CRT implantation could be reconsidered and individualized.

Dataset Information

Effect of left ventricular endocardial activation pattern on echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Objective

Design and setting

Patients

Interventions

Main outcome measures

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Effect of left ventricular endocardial activation pattern on echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure