Dataset Information

Comparing the continuous representation of time-series expression profiles to identify differentially expressed genes.

ABSTRACT: We present a general algorithm to detect genes differentially expressed between two nonhomogeneous time-series data sets. As increasing amounts of high-throughput biological data become available, a major challenge in genomic and computational biology is to develop methods for comparing data from different experimental sources. Time-series whole-genome expression data are a particularly valuable source of information because they can describe an unfolding biological process such as the cell cycle or immune response. However, comparisons of time-series expression data sets are hindered by biological and experimental inconsistencies such as differences in sampling rate, variations in the timing of biological processes, and the lack of repeats. Our algorithm overcomes these difficulties by using a continuous representation for time-series data and combining a noise model for individual samples with a global difference measure. We introduce a corresponding statistical method for computing the significance of this differential expression measure. We used our algorithm to compare cell-cycle-dependent gene expression in wild-type and knockout yeast strains. Our algorithm identified a set of 56 differentially expressed genes, and these results were validated by using independent protein-DNA-binding data. Unlike previous methods, our algorithm was also able to identify 22 non-cell-cycle-regulated genes as differentially expressed. This set of genes is significantly correlated in a set of independent expression experiments, suggesting additional roles for the transcription factors Fkh1 and Fkh2 in controlling cellular activity in yeast.

SUBMITTER: Bar-Joseph Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC193530 | biostudies-literature | 2003 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing the continuous representation of time-series expression profiles to identify differentially expressed genes.

Bar-Joseph Ziv Z Gerber Georg G Simon Itamar I Gifford David K DK Jaakkola Tommi S TS

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20030821 18

We present a general algorithm to detect genes differentially expressed between two nonhomogeneous time-series data sets. As increasing amounts of high-throughput biological data become available, a major challenge in genomic and computational biology is to develop methods for comparing data from different experimental sources. Time-series whole-genome expression data are a particularly valuable source of information because they can describe an unfolding biological process such as the cell cycl ...[more]

PMID: 12934016

Similar Datasets

Project description:Increasing evidence has indicated that modulation of epigenetic mechanisms, especially methylation and long-non-coding RNA (lncRNA) regulation, plays a pivotal role in the process of atherosclerosis; however, few studies focused on revealing the epigenetic-related subgroups during atherosclerotic progression using unsupervised clustering analysis. Hence, we aimed to identify the epigenetics-related differentially expressed genes associated with atherosclerosis subtypes and characterize their clinical utility in atherosclerosis. Eighty samples with expression data (GSE40231) and 49 samples with methylation data (GSE46394) from a large artery plaque were downloaded from the GEO database, and aberrantly methylated-differentially expressed (AMDE) genes were identified based on the relationship between methylation and expression. Furthermore, we conducted weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and co-expression analysis to identify the core AMDE genes strongly involved in atherosclerosis. K-means clustering was used to characterize two subtypes of atherosclerosis in GSE40231, and then 29 samples were recognized as validation dataset (GSE28829). In a blood sample cohort (GSE90074), chi-square test and logistic analysis were performed to explore the clinical implication of the K-means clusters. Furthermore, significance analysis of microarrays and prediction analysis of microarrays (PAM) were applied to identify the signature AMDE genes. Moreover, the classification performance of signature AMDE gene-based classifier from PAM was validated in another blood sample cohort (GSE34822). A total of 1,569 AMDE mRNAs and eight AMDE long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were identified by differential analysis. Through the WGCNA and co-expression analysis, 32 AMDE mRNAs and seven AMDE lncRNAs were identified as the core genes involved in atherosclerosis development. Functional analysis revealed that AMDE genes were strongly related to inflammation and axon guidance. In the clinical analysis, the atherosclerotic subtypes were associated with the severity of coronary artery disease and risk of adverse events. Eight genes, including PARP15, SERGEF, PDGFD, MRPL45, UBR1, STAU1, WIZ, and LSM4, were selected as the signature AMDE genes that most significantly differentiated between atherosclerotic subtypes. Ultimately, the area under the curve of signature AMDE gene-based classifier for atherosclerotic subtypes was 0.858 and 0.812 in GSE90074 and GSE34822, respectively. This study identified the AMDE genes (lncRNAs and mRNAs) that could be implemented in clinical clustering to recognize high-risk atherosclerotic patients.

Project description:BackgroundIdentifying differentially expressed genes (DEG) is a fundamental step in studies that perform genome wide expression profiling. Typically, DEG are identified by univariate approaches such as Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) or Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA) for processing cDNA microarrays, and differential gene expression analysis based on the negative binomial distribution (DESeq) or Empirical analysis of Digital Gene Expression data in R (edgeR) for RNA-seq profiling.ResultsHere we present a new geometrical multivariate approach to identify DEG called the Characteristic Direction. We demonstrate that the Characteristic Direction method is significantly more sensitive than existing methods for identifying DEG in the context of transcription factor (TF) and drug perturbation responses over a large number of microarray experiments. We also benchmarked the Characteristic Direction method using synthetic data, as well as RNA-Seq data. A large collection of microarray expression data from TF perturbations (73 experiments) and drug perturbations (130 experiments) extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), as well as an RNA-Seq study that profiled genome-wide gene expression and STAT3 DNA binding in two subtypes of diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma, were used for benchmarking the method using real data. ChIP-Seq data identifying DNA binding sites of the perturbed TFs, as well as known drug targets of the perturbing drugs, were used as prior knowledge silver-standard for validation. In all cases the Characteristic Direction DEG calling method outperformed other methods. We find that when drugs are applied to cells in various contexts, the proteins that interact with the drug-targets are differentially expressed and more of the corresponding genes are discovered by the Characteristic Direction method. In addition, we show that the Characteristic Direction conceptualization can be used to perform improved gene set enrichment analyses when compared with the gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and the hypergeometric test.ConclusionsThe application of the Characteristic Direction method may shed new light on relevant biological mechanisms that would have remained undiscovered by the current state-of-the-art DEG methods. The method is freely accessible via various open source code implementations using four popular programming languages: R, Python, MATLAB and Mathematica, all available at: http://www.maayanlab.net/CD.

Dataset Information

Comparing the continuous representation of time-series expression profiles to identify differentially expressed genes.

Publications

Comparing the continuous representation of time-series expression profiles to identify differentially expressed genes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets