Dataset Information

Orthologous transcription factors in bacteria have different functions and regulate different genes.

ABSTRACT: Transcription factors (TFs) form large paralogous gene families and have complex evolutionary histories. Here, we ask whether putative orthologs of TFs, from bidirectional best BLAST hits (BBHs), are evolutionary orthologs with conserved functions. We show that BBHs of TFs from distantly related bacteria are usually not evolutionary orthologs. Furthermore, the false orthologs usually respond to different signals and regulate distinct pathways, while the few BBHs that are evolutionary orthologs do have conserved functions. To test the conservation of regulatory interactions, we analyze expression patterns. We find that regulatory relationships between TFs and their regulated genes are usually not conserved for BBHs in Escherichia coli K12 and Bacillus subtilis. Even in the much more closely related bacteria Vibrio cholerae and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, predicting regulation from E. coli BBHs has high error rates. Using gene-regulon correlations, we identify genes whose expression pattern differs between E. coli and S. oneidensis. Using literature searches and sequence analysis, we show that these changes in expression patterns reflect changes in gene regulation, even for evolutionary orthologs. We conclude that the evolution of bacterial regulation should be analyzed with phylogenetic trees, rather than BBHs, and that bacterial regulatory networks evolve more rapidly than previously thought.

SUBMITTER: Price MN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC1971122 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Seizure incidence is increased in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and mouse models, and treatment with the antiseizure drug levetiracetam improves cognition. We reported that one mechanism by which seizures can exert persistent effects on cognition is through accumulation of ΔFosB, a transcription factor with a long half-life. Even the infrequent seizures that spontaneously occur in transgenic mice expressing human amyloid precursor protein (APP) lead to persistent increases in ΔFosB in the hippocampus, similar to what we observed in patients with AD or temporal lobe epilepsy. ΔFosB epigenetically regulates expression of target genes, however, whether ΔFosB targets the same genes when induced by seizures in different neurological conditions is not clear. We performed ChIP-sequencing to assess the repertoire of ΔFosB target genes in APP mice and in pilocarpine-treated wildtype mice (Pilo mice), a pharmacological model of epilepsy. These mouse models allowed us to compare AD, in which seizures occur in the context of high levels of amyloid beta, and epilepsy, in which recurrent seizures occur without AD-specific pathophysiology. Network profiling of genes bound by ΔFosB in APP mice, Pilo mice, and respective control mice revealed that functional domains modulated by ΔFosB in the hippocampus are expanded and diversified in APP and Pilo mice (vs. respective controls). Domains of interest in both disease contexts involved neuronal excitability and neurotransmission, neurogenesis, chromatin remodeling, and cellular stress and neuroinflammation. To assess the gene targets bound by ΔFosB regardless of seizure etiology, we focused on 442 genes with significant ΔFosB binding in both APP and Pilo mice (vs. respective controls). Functional analyses identified pathways that regulate membrane potential, glutamatergic signaling, calcium homeostasis, complement activation, neuron-glia population maintenance, and chromatin dynamics. RNA-sequencing and qPCR measurements in independent mice detected altered expression of several ΔFosB targets shared in APP and Pilo mice. Our findings indicate that seizure-induced ΔFosB can bind genes in patterns that depend on seizure etiology, but can bind other genes regardless of seizure etiology. Understanding the factors that underlie these differences, such as chromatin accessibility and/or abundance of co-factors, could reveal novel insights into the control of gene expression in disorders with recurrent seizures.

Project description:BackgroundAs originally defined, orthologous genes implied a reflection of the history of the species. In recent years, many studies have examined the concordance between orthologous gene trees and species trees in bacteria. These studies have produced contradictory results that may have been influenced by orthologous gene misidentification and artefactual phylogenetic reconstructions. Here, using a method that allows the detection and exclusion of false positives during identification of orthologous genes, we address the question of whether putative orthologous genes within bacteria really reflect the history of the species.ResultsWe identified a set of 370 orthologous genes from the bacterial order Rhizobiales. Although manifesting strong vertical signal, almost every orthologous gene had a distinct phylogeny, and the most common topology among the orthologous gene trees did not correspond with the best estimate of the species tree. However, each orthologous gene tree shared an average of 70% of its bipartitions with the best estimate of the species tree. Stochastic error related to gene size affected the concordance between the best estimated of the species tree and the orthologous gene trees, although this effect was weak and distributed unevenly among the functional categories. The nodes showing the greatest discordance were those defined by the shortest internal branches in the best estimated of the species tree. Moreover, a clear bias was evident with respect to the function of the orthologous genes, and the degree of divergence among the orthologous genes appeared to be related to their functional classification.ConclusionOrthologous genes do not reflect the history of the species when taken as individual markers, but they do when taken as a whole. Stochastic error affected the concordance of orthologous genes with the species tree, albeit weakly. We conclude that two important biological causes of discordance among orthologous genes are incomplete lineage sorting and functional restriction.

Dataset Information

Orthologous transcription factors in bacteria have different functions and regulate different genes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets