Dataset Information

Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

ABSTRACT: Among patients unlikely to attend a scheduled colonoscopy, we examined the impact of peer coach versus educational brochure support and compared these with concurrent patients who did not receive support.From health system data, we identified 275 consecutive patients aged >50 who kept <75% of visits to 4 primary care practices and scheduled for a first colonoscopy from February 1, 2005 to August 31, 2006. Using block randomization, we assigned consenting patients to a phone call by a peer coach trained to address barriers to attendance or to a mailed colonoscopy brochure. Study data came from electronic medical records. Odds ratios of colonoscopy attendance were adjusted for demographic, clinical, and health care factors.Colonoscopy attendance by the peer coach group (N = 70) and brochure group (N = 66) differed by 11% (68.6% vs 57.6%, respectively). Compared with the brochure group, the peer coach group had over twofold greater adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of attendance (2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-4.63) as did 49 patients who met the prespecified criteria for needing no support (2.68, 95% CI = 1.05-6.82) but the AORs did not differ significantly for 41 patients who declined support (0.61, 95% CI = 0.25-1.45) and 49 patients who could not be contacted (0.85, 95% CI = 0.36-2.02). Attendance was less likely for black versus white race (AOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.19-0.72) but more likely for patients with high versus low primary care visit adherence (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.04-5.07).For patients who often fail to keep appointments, peer coach support appears to promote colonoscopy attendance more than an educational brochure.

SUBMITTER: Turner BJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2173918 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Turner Barbara J BJ Weiner Mark M Berry Sheila D SD Lillie Karen K Fosnocht Kevin K Hollenbeak Christopher S CS

Journal of general internal medicine 20071121 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>Among patients unlikely to attend a scheduled colonoscopy, we examined the impact of peer coach versus educational brochure support and compared these with concurrent patients who did not receive support.<h4>Methods</h4>From health system data, we identified 275 consecutive patients aged >50 who kept <75% of visits to 4 primary care practices and scheduled for a first colonoscopy from February 1, 2005 to August 31, 2006. Using block randomization, we assigned consenting patien ...[more]

PMID: 18030540

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPain self-management is an effective, evidence-based treatment for chronic pain. Peer support, in which patients serve as coaches for other patients, has been effective in other chronic conditions and is a potentially promising approach to implementing pain self-management programs using fewer clinical resources.ObjectiveTo test a peer coach-delivered pain self-management program for chronic pain.DesignRandomized controlled trial.ParticipantsVeterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain.InterventionIntervention patients were assigned a trained peer coach for 6 months. Coaches, who were volunteers, were asked to contact their assigned patients, either by phone or in person, twice per month. Coaches and patients were given an intervention manual to guide sessions. The control group was offered a 2-hour pain self-management class.Main measuresThe primary outcome was total pain, assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary outcomes were anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, self-efficacy, social support, patient activation, health-related quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 9 months.Key resultsTwo hundred fifteen patients enrolled (120 intervention, 95 control). Adherence to intervention protocol was low, with only 13% of patients reporting having at least the recommended 12 peer coach meetings over the 6-month intervention. BPI total decreased from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 9 months in both groups. At 9 months, this change was statistically significant (intervention, - 0.40, p = 0.018; control, - 0.47, p = 0.006). There was not a statistically significant difference between groups on BPI at either time point. No secondary outcomes improved significantly in either group after adjusting for multiple comparisons.ConclusionsPatients randomized to peer support did not differ from control patients on primary and secondary outcomes. Other peer support models that do not rely on volunteers might be more effective.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02380690.

Project description:Adopting features of the Chronic Care Model may reduce coronary heart disease risk and blood pressure in vulnerable populations. We evaluated a peer and practice team intervention on reduction in 4-year coronary heart disease risk and systolic blood pressure.A single blind, randomized, controlled trial in two adjacent urban university-affiliated primary care practices. Two hundred eighty African-American subjects aged 40 to 75 with uncontrolled hypertension.Three monthly calls from trained peer patients with well-controlled hypertension and, on alternate months, two practice staff visits to review a personalized 4-year heart disease risk calculator and slide shows about heart disease risks. All subjects received usual physician care and brochures about healthy cooking and heart disease.Change in 4-year coronary heart disease risk (primary) and change in systolic blood pressure, both assessed at 6 months.At baseline, the 136 intervention and 144 control subjects' mean 4-year coronary heart disease risk did not differ (intervention=5.8 % and control=6.4 %, P=0.39), and their mean systolic blood pressure was the same (140.5 mmHg, p=0.83). Endpoint data for coronary heart disease were obtained for 69 % of intervention and 82 % of control subjects. After multiple imputation for missing endpoint data, the reduction in risk among all 280 subjects favored the intervention, but was not statistically significant (difference -0.73 %, 95 % confidence interval: -1.54 % to 0.09 %, p=0.08). Among the 247 subjects with a systolic blood pressure endpoint (85 % of intervention and 91 % of control subjects), more intervention than control subjects achieved a >5 mmHg reduction (61 % versus 45 %, respectively, p=0.01). After multiple imputation, the absolute reduction in systolic blood pressure was also greater for the intervention group (difference -6.47 mmHg, 95 % confidence interval: -10.69 to -2.25, P=0.003). One patient died in each study arm.Peer patient and office-based behavioral support for African-American patients with uncontrolled hypertension did not result in a significantly greater reduction in coronary heart disease risk but did significantly reduce systolic blood pressure.

Dataset Information

Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Publications

Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets