Dataset Information

Localization of protein-binding sites within families of proteins.

ABSTRACT: We address the question of whether or not the positions of protein-binding sites on homologous protein structures are conserved irrespective of the identities of their binding partners. First, for each domain family in the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP), protein-binding sites are extracted from our comprehensive database of structurally defined binary domain interactions (PIBASE). Second, the binding sites within each family are superposed using a structural alignment of its members. Finally, the degree of localization of binding sites within each family is quantified by comparing it with localization expected by chance. We found that 72% of the 1847 SCOP domain families in PIBASE have binding sites with localization values greater than expected by chance. Moreover, 554 (30%) of these families have localizations that are statistically significant (i.e., more than four standard deviations away from the mean expected by chance). In contrast, only 144 (8%) families have significantly low localization. The absence of a significant correlation of the binding site localization with the average sequence and structural conservations in a family suggests that localization can be helpful for describing the functional diversity of protein-protein interactions, complementing measures of sequence and structural conservation. Consideration of the binding site localization may also result in spatial restraints for the modeling of protein assembly structures.

SUBMITTER: Korkin D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2253467 | biostudies-literature | 2005 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Localization of protein-binding sites within families of proteins.

Korkin Dmitry D Davis Fred P FP Sali Andrej A

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 20050804 9

We address the question of whether or not the positions of protein-binding sites on homologous protein structures are conserved irrespective of the identities of their binding partners. First, for each domain family in the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP), protein-binding sites are extracted from our comprehensive database of structurally defined binary domain interactions (PIBASE). Second, the binding sites within each family are superposed using a structural alignment of its member ...[more]

PMID: 16081657

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Many integral membrane proteins, like their non-membrane counterparts, form either transient or permanent multi-subunit complexes in order to carry out their biochemical function. Computational methods that provide structural details of these interactions are needed since, despite their importance, relatively few structures of membrane protein complexes are available. RESULTS: We present a method for predicting which residues are in protein-protein binding sites within the transmembrane regions of membrane proteins. The method uses a Random Forest classifier trained on residue type distributions and evolutionary conservation for individual surface residues, followed by spatial averaging of the residue scores. The prediction accuracy achieved for membrane proteins is comparable to that for non-membrane proteins. Also, like previous results for non-membrane proteins, the accuracy is significantly higher for residues distant from the binding site boundary. Furthermore, a predictor trained on non-membrane proteins was found to yield poor accuracy on membrane proteins, as expected from the different distribution of surface residue types between the two classes of proteins. Thus, although the same procedure can be used to predict binding sites in membrane and non-membrane proteins, separate predictors trained on each class of proteins are required. Finally, the contribution of each residue property to the overall prediction accuracy is analyzed and prediction examples are discussed. CONCLUSION: Given a membrane protein structure and a multiple alignment of related sequences, the presented method gives a prioritized list of which surface residues participate in intramembrane protein-protein interactions. The method has potential applications in guiding the experimental verification of membrane protein interactions, structure-based drug discovery, and also in constraining the search space for computational methods, such as protein docking or threading, that predict membrane protein complex structures.

Project description:The Rep proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) are known to bind to Rep recognition sequences (RRSs) in the AAV inverted terminal repeats (ITRs), the AAV p5 promoter, and the preferred AAV integration site in human chromosome 19, called AAVS1. Integration of the AAV genome into AAVS1 appears to be mediated by an interaction between the Rep proteins of AAV and Rep binding sites within the viral genome and the integration locus. In an attempt to identify potential alternate integration sites, we looked for recognition sites for AAV Rep proteins in the human genome by performing a BLASTN computerized homology search. We used the 16-mer core sequences of the RRSs in the AAV ITRs and AAVS1 separately as query sequences and identified 18 new RRSs in or flanking the genes coding for the following: tyrosine kinase activator protein 1 (TKA-1); colony stimulating factor-1; insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2); histone H2B.1; basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan, also known as perlecan; the AF-9 gene product, which is involved in the chromosomal translocation t (9:11)(p22:q23); the betaB subunit of the hormone known as inhibin; interleukin-2 enhancer binding factor; an endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment resident protein called p63; a global transcription activator (hSNF2L); the beta-actin repair domain; a retinoic acid-inducible factor, also known as midkine; a breast tumor autoantigen; a growth-arrest- and DNA-damage-inducible protein called gadd45; the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor called KIP2, which inhibits several G1 cyclin-cyclin-dependent kinase complexes; and the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer gene (BRCA1). RRSs were also identified in a newly discovered open reading frame on chromosome 10 and in the ERCC1 locus on human chromosome 19. The ability of a maltose binding protein-Rep68 fusion protein to bind to these sequences was confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. These sites may serve as alternate integration sites for AAV or play a role in Rep-mediated effects on human cells.

Project description:Transferrin-binding protein B (TbpB) from Neisseria meningitidis binds human transferrin (hTf) at the surface of the bacterial cell as part of the iron uptake process. To identify hTf binding sites within the meningococcal TbpB, defined regions of the molecule were produced in Escherichia coli by a translational fusion expression system and the ability of the recombinant proteins (rTbpB) to bind peroxidase-conjugated hTf was characterized by Western blot and dot blot assays. Both the N-terminal domain (amino acids [aa] 2 to 351) and the C-terminal domain (aa 352 to 691) were able to bind hTf, and by a peptide spot synthesis approach, two and five hTf binding sites were identified in the N- and C-terminal domains, respectively. The hTf binding activity of three rTbpB deletion variants constructed within the central region (aa 346 to 543) highlighted the importance of a specific peptide (aa 377 to 394) in the ligand interaction. Taken together, the results indicated that the N- and C-terminal domains bound hTf approximately 10 and 1000 times less, respectively, than the full-length rTbpB (aa 2 to 691), while the central region (aa 346 to 543) had a binding avidity in the same order of magnitude as the C-terminal domain. In contrast with the hTf binding in the N-terminal domain, which was mediated by conformational epitopes, linear determinants seemed to be involved in the hTf binding in the C-terminal domain. The host specificity for transferrin appeared to be mediated by the N-terminal domain of the meningococcal rTbpB rather than the C-terminal domain, since we report that murine Tf binds to the C-terminal domain. Antisera raised to both N- and C-terminal domains were bactericidal for the parent strain, indicating that both domains are accessible at the bacterial surface. We have thus identified hTf binding sites within each domain of the TbpB from N. meningitidis and propose that the N- and C-terminal domains together contribute to the efficient binding of TbpB to hTf with their respective affinities and specificities for determinants of their ligand.

Dataset Information

Localization of protein-binding sites within families of proteins.

Publications

Localization of protein-binding sites within families of proteins.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets