Dataset Information

Does screening in the emergency department hurt or help victims of intimate partner violence?

ABSTRACT: Recent systematic reviews have noted a lack of evidence that screening for intimate partner violence does more good than harm. We assess whether patients screened for intimate partner violence on a computer kiosk in the emergency department (ED) experienced any adverse events during or subsequent to the ED visit and whether computer kiosk identification and referral of intimate partner violence in the ED setting resulted in safety behaviors or contact with referrals.We conducted a prospective, observational study in which a convenience sample of male and female ED patients triaged to the waiting room who screened positive (on a computer kiosk-based questionnaire) for intimate partner violence in the past year were provided with resources and information and invited to participate in a series of follow-up interviews. At 1-week and 3-month follow-up visits, we assessed intimate partner violence, safety issues, and use of resources. In addition, to obtain an objective measure of safety, we assessed the number of violence-related 911 calls to participant addresses within a call district 6 months before and 6 months after the index ED visit.Of the 2,134 participants in a relationship in the last year, 548 (25.7%) screened positive for intimate partner violence. No safety issues, such as calling security or a partner's interference with the screening, occurred during the ED visit for any patient who disclosed intimate partner violence. Of the 216 intimate partner violence victims interviewed in person and 65 contacted by telephone 1 week later, no intimate partner violence victims reported any injuries or increased intimate partner violence resulting from participating in the study. For the sample in the local police district, there was no increase in the number of intimate partner violence victims who called 911 in the 6 months after the ED visit. Finally, 35% (n=131) reported they had contacted community resources during the 3-month follow-up period.Among patients screening positive for intimate partner violence, there were no identified adverse events related to screening, and many had contacted community resources.

SUBMITTER: Houry D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2276575 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does screening in the emergency department hurt or help victims of intimate partner violence?

Houry Debra D Kaslow Nadine J NJ Kemball Robin S RS McNutt Louise Anne LA Cerulli Catherine C Straus Helen H Rosenberg Eli E Lu Chengxing C Rhodes Karin V KV

Annals of emergency medicine 20080307 4

<h4>Study objective</h4>Recent systematic reviews have noted a lack of evidence that screening for intimate partner violence does more good than harm. We assess whether patients screened for intimate partner violence on a computer kiosk in the emergency department (ED) experienced any adverse events during or subsequent to the ED visit and whether computer kiosk identification and referral of intimate partner violence in the ED setting resulted in safety behaviors or contact with referrals.<h4>M ...[more]

PMID: 18313800

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. Previous studies indicate gaps in identifying and referring female patients with IPV-associated orbital and ocular injuries to ancillary services.ObjectiveTo determine the number of IPV-associated orbital floor fractures, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, and ruptured globes referred to ancillary services in adult female patients following an educational and screening intervention to health care professionals.Design, setting, and participantsThis single-center retrospective quality improvement analysis examined electronic medical records of adult female patients seen in a single level 1 trauma center emergency department and ophthalmology clinic between January 2015 and February 2019, after the initiative began. Female adults who sustained orbital floor fractures, ZMC fractures, or ruptured globes were included. Preinitiative data were previously collected between January 1995 and January 2015 on adult female patients and published. Data analysis for this study occurred from May 2020 to September 2020.InterventionsA 2-part, ongoing initiative began January 2015. First, enhancement of IPV screening protocols in the emergency department was conducted. Second, an educational campaign on IPV injury patterns was presented to residents and faculty in ophthalmology, emergency, otolaryngology, and trauma departments.Main outcomes and measuresComparison of ancillary service involvement preinitiative (January 1995 to January 2015) and postinitiative (January 2015 to February 2019).ResultsA total of 216 adult female patients (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [22.7] years; age range, 18-99 years) sustained orbital floor or ZMC fractures postinitiative. A total of 22 of 216 (10.2%) sustained fractures from IPV compared with 31 of 405 (7.6%) preinitiative (95% CI, -2.2% to 7.3%; P = .28). Documented social work referrals (11 of 31 preinitiative vs 20 of 22 postinitiative; difference, 55% [95% CI, 35%-76%]; P < .001), homegoing safety assessments (1 of 31 preinitiative vs 18 of 22 postinitiative; difference, 79% [95% CI, 61%-96%]; P < .001), and law enforcement involvement (7 of 21 preinitiative vs 16 of 22 postinitiative; difference, 50% [95% CI, 26%-74%]; P < .001) were higher in patients who presented after the initiative with orbital floor and ZMC fractures. A total of 51 adult female patients (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [20.8] years; age range 20-93 years) sustained ruptured globes postinitiative. A total of 5 of 51 patients (9.8%) sustained injury due to IPV postinitiative, compared with 5 of 141 (3.5%) preinitiative (95% patients, -2.5% to 15.0%; P = .08).Conclusions and relevanceFollowing the start of the initiative, referral patterns of adult female patients with IPV-associated orbital fractures improved. Targeted IPV screening of patients with orbital and ocular injuries is essential for effective intervention.

Project description:Intimate partner violence (IPV) and heavy drinking are co-occurring public health problems, but integrated brief interventions for these conditions have not been tested.To determine whether a brief motivational intervention provided at the time of an emergency department (ED) visit reduces IPV and heavy drinking.A randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 US academic urban EDs between January 2011 and December 2014 to assess the effectiveness of a motivational intervention for IPV-involved female ED patients (ages: 18-64 years; N?=?600) who exceeded sex-specific safe drinking limits. All received social service referrals; 2:2:1 to brief intervention (n?=?242), assessed control (n?=?237), or no-contact control (n?=?121).A 20- to 30-minute manual-guided motivational intervention (recorded and monitored for fidelity) delivered by master's-level therapists with a follow-up telephone booster. The assessed control group received the same number of assessments as the brief intervention group; the no-contact control group was assessed only once at 3 months.Incidents of heavy drinking and experiencing IPV measured over prespecified, 12 weekly assessments using an interactive voice response system.Of 600 participants, 80% were black women with a mean age of 32 years. Retention was 89% for 2 or more interactive voice response system calls. Seventy-eight percent of women completed the 3-month interview, 79% at 6 months, and 71% at 12 months. During the 12-week period following the brief motivational intervention, there were no significant differences between the intervention group and the assessed control group on weekly assessments for experiencing IPV (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.06) or heavy drinking (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03). From baseline to 12 weeks, the number of women with any IPV in the past week decreased from 57% (134 of 237) in the intervention group to 43% (83 of 194) and from 63% (145 of 231) in the assessed control group to 41% (77 of 187) (absolute difference of 8%). From baseline to 12 weeks, the number of women with past week heavy drinking decreased from 51% (120 of 236) in the intervention group to 43% (83 of 194) and from 46% (107 of 231) in the assessed control group to 41% (77 of 187) (absolute difference of 3%). At 12 months, 43% (71 of 165) of the intervention group and 47% (78 of 165) of the assessed control group reported no IPV during the previous 3 months and 19% (29 of 152) of the intervention group and 24% (37 of 153) of the control group had reduced their alcohol consumption to sex-specific National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism safe drinking levels.For women experiencing IPV and heavy drinking, the use of a brief motivational intervention in the ED compared with assessed and no-contact controls did not significantly reduce the days of heavy drinking or incidents of IPV. These findings do not support a brief motivational intervention in this setting.clinicaltrials.gov Identifer: NCT01207258.

Dataset Information

Does screening in the emergency department hurt or help victims of intimate partner violence?

Publications

Does screening in the emergency department hurt or help victims of intimate partner violence?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets