Dataset Information

Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.

ABSTRACT:

Context

Thousands of adults lost coverage after Oregon's Medicaid program implemented cost containment policies in March 2003. Despite the continuation of comprehensive public health coverage for children, the percentage of uninsured children in the state rose from 10.1 percent in 2002 to 12.3 percent in 2004 (over 110,000 uninsured children). Among the uninsured children, over half of them were likely eligible for public health insurance coverage.

Research objective

To examine barriers low-income families face when attempting to access children's health insurance. To examine possible links between Medicaid cutbacks in adult coverage and children's loss of coverage.

Data source/study setting

Statewide primary data from low-income households enrolled in Oregon's food stamp program.

Study design

Cross-sectional analysis. The primary predictor variable was whether or not any adults in the household recently lost Medicaid coverage. The main outcome variables were children's current insurance status and children's insurance coverage gaps.

Data collection

A mail-return survey instrument was designed to collect information from a stratified, random sample of households with children presumed eligible for publicly funded health insurance programs.

Principal findings

Over 10 percent of children in the study population eligible for publicly funded health insurance programs were uninsured, and over 25 percent of these children had gaps in insurance coverage during a 12-month period. Low-income children who were most likely to be uninsured or have coverage gaps were Hispanic; were teenagers older than 14; were in families at the higher end of the income threshold; had an employed parent; or had a parent who was uninsured. Fifty percent of the uninsured children lived in a household with at least one adult who had recently lost Medicaid coverage, compared with only 40 percent of insured children (p=.040). Similarly, over 51 percent of children with a recent gap in insurance coverage had an adult in the household who lost Medicaid, compared with only 38 percent of children without coverage gaps (p<.0001). After adjusting for ethnicity, age, household income, and parental employment, children living in a household with an adult who lost Medicaid coverage after recent cutbacks had a higher likelihood of having no current health insurance (OR 1.44, 95 percent CI 1.02, 2.04), and/or having an insurance gap (OR 1.79, 95 percent CI 1.36, 2.36).

Conclusions

Uninsured children and those with recent coverage gaps were more likely to have adults in their household who lost Medicaid coverage after recent cutbacks. Although current fiscal constraints prevent many states from expanding public health insurance coverage to more parents, states need to be aware of the impact on children when adults lose coverage. It is critical to develop strategies to keep parents informed regarding continued eligibility and benefits for their children and to reduce administrative barriers to children's enrollment and retention in public health insurance programs.

SUBMITTER: DeVoe JE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2323132 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.

DeVoe Jennifer E JE Krois Lisa L Edlund Tina T Smith Jeanene J Carlson Nichole E NE

Health services research 20080201 1 Pt 2

<h4>Context</h4>Thousands of adults lost coverage after Oregon's Medicaid program implemented cost containment policies in March 2003. Despite the continuation of comprehensive public health coverage for children, the percentage of uninsured children in the state rose from 10.1 percent in 2002 to 12.3 percent in 2004 (over 110,000 uninsured children). Among the uninsured children, over half of them were likely eligible for public health insurance coverage.<h4>Research objective</h4>To examine ba ...[more]

PMID: 18199193

Similar Datasets

Project description:In the United States, health insurance is not universal. Observational studies show an association between uninsured parents and children. This association persisted even after expansions in child-only public health insurance. Oregon's randomized Medicaid expansion for adults, known as the Oregon Experiment, created a rare opportunity to assess causality between parent and child coverage.To estimate the effect on a child's health insurance coverage status when (1) a parent randomly gains access to health insurance and (2) a parent obtains coverage.Oregon Experiment randomized natural experiment assessing the results of Oregon's 2008 Medicaid expansion. We used generalized estimating equation models to examine the longitudinal effect of a parent randomly selected to apply for Medicaid on their child's Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage (intent-to-treat analyses). We used per-protocol analyses to understand the impact on children's coverage when a parent was randomly selected to apply for and obtained Medicaid. Participants included 14409 children aged 2 to 18 years whose parents participated in the Oregon Experiment.For intent-to-treat analyses, the date a parent was selected to apply for Medicaid was considered the date the child was exposed to the intervention. In per-protocol analyses, exposure was defined as whether a selected parent obtained Medicaid.Children's Medicaid or CHIP coverage, assessed monthly and in 6-month intervals relative to their parent's selection date.In the immediate period after selection, children whose parents were selected to apply significantly increased from 3830 (61.4%) to 4152 (66.6%) compared with a nonsignificant change from 5049 (61.8%) to 5044 (61.7%) for children whose parents were not selected to apply. Children whose parents were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid had 18% higher odds of being covered in the first 6 months after parent's selection compared with children whose parents were not selected (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.27). The effect remained significant during months 7 to 12 (AOR=1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19); months 13 to 18 showed a positive but not significant effect (AOR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.14). Children whose parents were selected and obtained coverage had more than double the odds of having coverage compared with children whose parents were not selected and did not gain coverage (AOR=2.37; 95% CI, 2.14-2.64).Children's odds of having Medicaid or CHIP coverage increased when their parents were randomly selected to apply for Medicaid. Children whose parents were selected and subsequently obtained coverage benefited most. This study demonstrates a causal link between parents' access to Medicaid coverage and their children's coverage.

Project description:ImportanceTo reduce postpartum uninsurance and improve postpartum health, the American Rescue Plan included an option for states to extend pregnancy-related Medicaid from 60 days to 1 year after childbirth. Recent estimates of postpartum uninsurance among Medicaid-paid births would provide information on who would benefit from state adoption of this extension.ObjectiveTo estimate rates of postpartum uninsurance among individuals with Medicaid-paid births.Design setting and participantsThis cross-sectional study used survey data from the 2015 to 2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), a representative sample of births in 43 states and New York City, New York, and included PRAMS participants for whom Medicaid was the primary payer for childbirth. The mean weighted PRAMS response rate was 60.9% for the sites and years included in this study. The data were analyzed from December 2020 to January 2021.Interventions or exposuresSelf-reported postpartum uninsurance measured at the time of the PRAMS survey (mean [interquartile range], 4.2 (3.0-5.0) months after birth).Main outcomes and measuresSurvey-weighted rates of postpartum uninsurance and 95% CIs overall, by state, by state Medicaid expansion status, and by maternal sociodemographic characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios of the association between maternal characteristics and postpartum uninsurance.ResultsWe identified 63 370 respondents with a Medicaid-paid birth. Of these, 22 016 (41.1%) were non-Hispanic White individuals, 17 442 (22.0%) non-Hispanic Black individuals, 6808 (13.3%) Spanish-speaking Hispanic individuals, 7000 (13.7%) English-speaking Hispanic individuals, 2410 (4.0%) Asian/Pacific Islander individuals, and 3894 (1.3%) Indigenous individuals. Of these, 41.7% were no longer insured by Medicaid postpartum and 22.0% were uninsured postpartum. The postpartum uninsurance rate was 3 times higher in Medicaid nonexpansion states (36.8%) compared with expansion states (12.8%). Postpartum uninsurance varied significantly across states, ranging from 1.7% in Massachusetts to 56.7% in Texas. There were substantial racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum uninsurance: 54.9% of Hispanic, Spanish-speaking individuals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.2; 95% CI, 5.5-7.0) and 42.8% of Indigenous respondents reported postpartum uninsurance (aOR, 4.3; 95% CI, 3.8-4.9) compared with 15.2% of non-Hispanic White respondents. The odds of postpartum uninsurance was higher among unmarried people (aOR, 1.3 compared with married people; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4), those 35 years and older (aOR, 1.5 compared with those younger than 20 years; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9) and those with lower levels of education (aOR, 0.8 for more than high school compared with less than high school; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional survey study of 43 states, a high proportion of people with Medicaid-paid births were uninsured in the postpartum period, particularly those living in Medicaid nonexpansion states. The study findings suggest that state extensions of pregnancy-related Medicaid eligibility through the first year postpartum could disproportionately benefit Hispanic and Indigenous people, unmarried people, those with lower education levels, and those living in Medicaid nonexpansion states.

Project description:ImportancePolicy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic affected health coverage rates, and the "unwinding" of Medicaid's continuous coverage provision in 2023 and 2024 may cause widespread coverage loss. Recent coverage patterns in national survey and administrative data can inform these issues.ObjectiveTo assess national and state changes in survey-based Medicaid, private insurance, and uninsured rates between 2019 and 2022, as well as how these changes compare with administrative Medicaid enrollment totals.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study analyzes nationally representative survey data for all US residents in the American Community Survey (ACS) from 2019 to 2022 compared with administrative data on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Data analysis was conducted between June 2023 and January 2024.ExposuresThe COVID-19 pandemic, the Medicaid continuous coverage provision, and policy efforts to increase Marketplace coverage.Main outcomes and measuresMedicaid coverage (self-reported [ACS] and administratively recorded [CMS]), survey-reported uninsured, Medicare, and private insurance status.ResultsA nationally representative sample consisted of 12 506 584 US residents of all ages (survey-weighted 59.7% aged 19-64 years and 50.6% female). CMS statistics showed an increase in Medicaid coverage of 5.2 percentage points as a share of the population from 2019 to 2022. However, changes in the uninsured rate and survey-reported Medicaid were smaller: -1.2 (95% CI, -1.3 to -1.2) percentage points and 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.4) percentage points, respectively. There was a 3.9 percentage point increase in the ACS's "undercount" of Medicaid enrollment, compared with CMS data, from 2019 to 2022. This undercount was larger among children than adults but smaller in states that recently expanded Medicaid. Rates of additional forms of coverage (such as private insurance) among those in Medicaid also grew during this time.Conclusion and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study, the uninsured rate declined considerably from 2019 to 2022 but was just one-fourth as large as the growth in administrative Medicaid enrollment under the pandemic continuous coverage provision. Survey-based Medicaid growth was far smaller than administrative growth. This suggests that many people who remained enrolled in Medicaid during the pandemic did not realize that their coverage had continued. These findings have implications for projecting uninsured changes during unwinding, as well as the effect of continuous coverage policies on continuity of care.

Dataset Information

Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.

Context

Research objective

Data source/study setting

Study design

Data collection

Principal findings

Conclusions

Publications

Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing Medicaid coverage: Results from a statewide survey of Oregon families.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets