Dataset Information

Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme-inhibitor interfaces: implications for the protein-protein docking problem.

ABSTRACT: We have carried out a thorough and systematic sequence-structure study on how the pattern of conservation at the interface differs from the noninteracting surface in seven proteases and their inhibitors. As expected, the interface of a protease could be easily distinguished from the noninteracting surface by a concentrated area of conservation. In contrast, there was less distinction to be made between the interface and the noninteracting surface of inhibitors, and in five of the seven cases, a higher proportion of the interface area was variable compared to the rest of the surface. This is likely to cause a problem for binding-site prediction methods that assume the largest cluster of highly conserved residues on the surface of a protein corresponds to the interface. We conclude that such methods would succeed when applied to our protease test cases, but complications could arise with the inhibitors. These results also impact on methods to solve the protein-protein docking problem that use conservation at the interface to provide the location of the two protein binding sites prior to application of the docking algorithm.

SUBMITTER: Bradford JR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2324006 | biostudies-literature | 2003 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme-inhibitor interfaces: implications for the protein-protein docking problem.

Bradford James R JR Westhead David R DR

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 20030901 9

We have carried out a thorough and systematic sequence-structure study on how the pattern of conservation at the interface differs from the noninteracting surface in seven proteases and their inhibitors. As expected, the interface of a protease could be easily distinguished from the noninteracting surface by a concentrated area of conservation. In contrast, there was less distinction to be made between the interface and the noninteracting surface of inhibitors, and in five of the seven cases, a ...[more]

PMID: 12931008

Similar Datasets

Project description:The protein-protein interaction energy of 12 nonhomologous serine protease-inhibitor and 15 antibody-antigen complexes is calculated using a molecular mechanics formalism and dissected in terms of the main-chain vs. side-chain contribution, nonrotameric side-chain contributions, and amino acid residue type involvement in the interface interaction. There are major differences in the interactions of the two types of protein-protein complex. Protease-inhibitor complexes interact predominantly through a main-chain-main-chain mechanism while antibody-antigen complexes interact predominantly through a side-chain-side-chain or a side-chain-main-chain mechanism. However, there is no simple correlation between the main-chain-main-chain interaction energy and the percentage of main-chain surface area buried on binding. The interaction energy is equally effected by the presence of nonrotameric side-chain conformations, which constitute approximately 20% of the interaction energy. The ability to reproduce the interface interaction energy of the crystal structure if original side-chain conformations are removed from the calculation is much greater in the protease-inhibitor complexes than the antibody-antigen complexes. The success of a rotameric model for protein-protein docking appears dependent on the extent of the main-chain-main-chain contribution to binding. Analysis of (1) residue type and (2) residue pair interactions at the interface show that antibody-antigen interactions are very restricted with over 70% of the antibody energy attributable to just six residue types (Tyr > Asp > Asn > Ser > Glu > Trp) in agreement with previous studies on residue propensity. However, it is found here that 50% of the antigen energy is attributable to just four residue types (Arg = Lys > Asn > Asp). On average just 12 residue pair interactions (6%) contribute over 40% of the favorable interaction energy in the antibody-antigen complexes, with charge-charge and charge/polar-tyrosine interactions being prominent. In contrast protease inhibitors use a diverse set of residue types and residue pair interactions.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Protein-protein recognition is of fundamental importance in the vast majority of biological processes. However, it has already been demonstrated that it is very hard to distinguish true complexes from false complexes in so-called cross-docking experiments, where binary protein complexes are separated and the isolated proteins are all docked against each other and scored. Does this result, at least in part, reflect a physical reality? False complexes could reflect possible nonspecific or weak associations. RESULTS:In this paper, we investigate the twilight zone of protein-protein interactions, building on an interesting outcome of cross-docking experiments: false complexes seem to favor residues from the true interaction site, suggesting that randomly chosen partners dock in a non-random fashion on protein surfaces. Here, we carry out arbitrary docking of a non-redundant data set of 198 proteins, with more than 300 randomly chosen "probe" proteins. We investigate the tendency of arbitrary partners to aggregate at localized regions of the protein surfaces, the shape and compositional bias of the generated interfaces, and the potential of this property to predict biologically relevant binding sites. We show that the non-random localization of arbitrary partners after protein-protein docking is a generic feature of protein structures. The interfaces generated in this way are not systematically planar or curved, but tend to be closer than average to the center of the proteins. These results can be used to predict biological interfaces with an AUC value up to 0.69 alone, and 0.72 when used in combination with evolutionary information. An appropriate choice of random partners and number of docking models make this method computationally practical. It is also noted that nonspecific interfaces can point to alternate interaction sites in the case of proteins with multiple interfaces. We illustrate the usefulness of arbitrary docking using PEBP (Phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein), a kinase inhibitor with multiple partners. CONCLUSIONS:An approach using arbitrary docking, and based solely on physical properties, can successfully identify biologically pertinent protein interfaces.

Dataset Information

Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme-inhibitor interfaces: implications for the protein-protein docking problem.

Publications

Asymmetric mutation rates at enzyme-inhibitor interfaces: implications for the protein-protein docking problem.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets