Dataset Information

Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function.

ABSTRACT: Many protein pairs that share the same fold do not have any detectable sequence similarity, providing a valuable source of information for studying sequence-structure relationship. In this study, we use a stringent data set of structurally similar, sequence-dissimilar protein pairs to characterize residues that may play a role in the determination of protein structure and/or function. For each protein in the database, we identify amino-acid positions that show residue conservation within both close and distant family members. These positions are termed "persistently conserved". We then proceed to determine the "mutually" persistently conserved (MPC) positions: those structurally aligned positions in a protein pair that are persistently conserved in both pair mates. Because of their intra- and interfamily conservation, these positions are good candidates for determining protein fold and function. We find that 45% of the persistently conserved positions are mutually conserved. A significant fraction of them are located in critical positions for secondary structure determination, they are mostly buried, and many of them form spatial clusters within their protein structures. A substitution matrix based on the subset of MPC positions shows two distinct characteristics: (i) it is different from other available matrices, even those that are derived from structural alignments; (ii) its relative entropy is high, emphasizing the special residue restrictions imposed on these positions. Such a substitution matrix should be valuable for protein design experiments.

SUBMITTER: Friedberg I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2373454 | biostudies-literature | 2002 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function.

Friedberg Iddo I Margalit Hanah H

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society 20020201 2

Many protein pairs that share the same fold do not have any detectable sequence similarity, providing a valuable source of information for studying sequence-structure relationship. In this study, we use a stringent data set of structurally similar, sequence-dissimilar protein pairs to characterize residues that may play a role in the determination of protein structure and/or function. For each protein in the database, we identify amino-acid positions that show residue conservation within both cl ...[more]

PMID: 11790845

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is often assumed that in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), two proteins with similar sequences will also have similar structures. Accordingly, it has proved useful to develop subsets of the PDB from which "redundant" structures have been removed, based on a sequence-based criterion for similarity. Similarly, when predicting protein structure using homology modeling, if a template structure for modeling a target sequence is selected by sequence alone, this implicitly assumes that all sequence-similar templates are equivalent. Here, we show that this assumption is often not correct and that standard approaches to create subsets of the PDB can lead to the loss of structurally and functionally important information. We have carried out sequence-based structural superpositions and geometry-based structural alignments of a large number of protein pairs to determine the extent to which sequence similarity ensures structural similarity. We find many examples where two proteins that are similar in sequence have structures that differ significantly from one another. The source of the structural differences usually has a functional basis. The number of such proteins pairs that are identified and the magnitude of the dissimilarity depend on the approach that is used to calculate the differences; in particular sequence-based structure superpositioning will identify a larger number of structurally dissimilar pairs than geometry-based structural alignments. When two sequences can be aligned in a statistically meaningful way, sequence-based structural superpositioning provides a meaningful measure of structural differences. This approach and geometry-based structure alignments reveal somewhat different information and one or the other might be preferable in a given application. Our results suggest that in some cases, notably homology modeling, the common use of nonredundant datasets, culled from the PDB based on sequence, may mask important structural and functional information. We have established a data base of sequence-similar, structurally dissimilar protein pairs that will help address this problem (http://luna.bioc.columbia.edu/rachel/seqsimstrdiff.htm).

Project description:The explosion of protein sequences deduced from genetic code has led to both a problem and a potential resource: Efficient data use requires interpreting the functional impact of sequence change without experimentally characterizing each protein variant. Several groups have hypothesized that interpretation could be aided by analyzing the sequences of naturally occurring homologues. To that end, myriad sequence/function analyses have been developed to predict which conserved, semi-conserved, and nonconserved positions are functionally important. These positions must be discriminated from the nonconserved positions that are functionally silent. However, the assumptions that underlie sequence analyses are based on experimental results that are sparse and usually designed to address different questions. Here, we use three homologues from a test family common to bioinformatics-the LacI/GalR transcription repressors-to test a common assumption: If a position is functionally important for one family member, it has similar importance in all homologues. We generated experimental sequence/function information for each nonconserved position in the 18 amino acids that link the DNA-binding and regulatory domains of three LacI/GalR homologues. We find that the functional importance of each position is preserved among the three linkers, albeit to different degrees. We also find that every linker position contributes to function, which has twofold implications. (1) Since the linker positions range from highly conserved to semi-conserved to nonconserved and contribute to affinity, selectivity, and allosteric response, we assert that sequence/function analyses must identify positions in the LacI/GalR linkers to be qualified as "successful". Many analyses overlook this region since most of the residues do not directly contact ligand. (2) No position in the LacI/GalR linker is functionally silent. This finding is inconsistent with another underlying principle of many analyses: Using sequence sets to discriminate important from non-contributing positions obligates silent positions, which denotes that most homologues tolerate a variety of amino acid substitutions at the position without functional change. Instead, additional combinatorial mutants in the LacI/GalR linkers show that particular substitutions can be silent in a context-dependent manner. Thus, specific permutations of sequence change (rather than change at silent positions) would facilitate neutral drift during evolution. Finally, the combinatorial mutants also reveal functional synergy between semi- and nonconserved positions. Such functional relationships would be missed by analyses that rely primarily upon co-evolution.

Dataset Information

Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function.

Publications

Persistently conserved positions in structurally similar, sequence dissimilar proteins: roles in preserving protein fold and function.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets