Dataset Information

Assessment of gene expression in many samples using vertical arrays.

ABSTRACT: Microarrays and high-throughput sequencing methods can be used to measure the expression of thousands of genes in a biological sample in a few days, whereas PCR-based methods can be used to measure the expression of a few genes in thousands of samples in about the same amount of time. These methods become more costly as the number of biological samples increases or as the number of genes of interest increases, respectively, and these factors constrain experimental design. To address these issues, we introduced 'vertical arrays' in which RNA from each biological sample is converted into multiple, overlapping cDNA subsets and spotted on glass slides. These vertical arrays can be queried with single gene probes to assess the expression behavior in thousands of biological samples in a single hybridization reaction. The spotted subsets are less complex than the original RNA from which they derive, which improves signal-to-noise ratios. Here, we demonstrate the quantitative capabilities of vertical arrays, including the sensitivity and accuracy of the method and the number of subsets needed to achieve this accuracy for most expressed genes.

SUBMITTER: Risques RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2425485 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Assessment of gene expression in many samples using vertical arrays.

Risques Rosa Ana RA Rondeau Gaelle G Judex Martin M McClelland Michael M Welsh John J

Nucleic acids research 20080512 10

Microarrays and high-throughput sequencing methods can be used to measure the expression of thousands of genes in a biological sample in a few days, whereas PCR-based methods can be used to measure the expression of a few genes in thousands of samples in about the same amount of time. These methods become more costly as the number of biological samples increases or as the number of genes of interest increases, respectively, and these factors constrain experimental design. To address these issues ...[more]

PMID: 18474526

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing and isoform level expression profiling is an emerging field of interest within genomics. Splicing sensitive microarrays, with probes targeted to individual exons or exon-junctions, are becoming increasingly popular as a tool capable of both expression profiling and finer scale isoform detection. Despite their intuitive appeal, relatively little is known about the performance of such tools, particularly in comparison with more traditional 3' targeted microarrays. Here, we use the well studied Microarray Quality Control (MAQC) dataset to benchmark the Affymetrix Exon Array, and compare it to two other popular platforms: Illumina, and Affymetrix U133. RESULTS: We show that at the gene expression level, the Exon Array performs comparably with the two 3' targeted platforms. However, the interplatform correlation of the results is slightly lower than between the two 3' arrays. We show that some of the discrepancies stem from the RNA amplification protocols, e.g. the Exon Array is able to detect expression of non-polyadenylated transcripts. More importantly, we show that many other differences result from the ability of the Exon Array to monitor more detailed isoform-level changes; several examples illustrate that changes detected by the 3' platforms are actually isoform variations, and that the nature of these variations can be resolved using Exon Array data. Finally, we show how the Exon Array can be used to detect alternative isoform differences, such as alternative splicing, transcript termination, and alternative promoter usage. We discuss the possible pitfalls and false positives resulting from isoform-level analysis. CONCLUSION: The Exon Array is a valuable tool that can be used to profile gene expression while providing important additional information regarding the types of gene isoforms that are expressed and variable. However, analysis of alternative splicing requires much more hands on effort and visualization of results in order to correctly interpret the data, and generally results in considerably higher false positive rates than expression analysis. One of the main sources of error in the MAQC dataset is variation in amplification efficiency across transcripts, most likely caused by joint effects of elevated GC content in the 5' ends of genes and reduced likelihood of random-primed first strand synthesis in the 3' ends of genes. These effects are currently not adequately corrected using existing statistical methods. We outline approaches to reduce such errors by filtering out potentially problematic data.

Dataset Information

Assessment of gene expression in many samples using vertical arrays.

Publications

Assessment of gene expression in many samples using vertical arrays.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets