Dataset Information

Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A number of protein markers have been investigated as prognostic adjuncts in breast cancer but their translation into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of appropriate validation. Recently, we showed that BCL2 protein expression had prognostic power independent of current used standards. Here, we present the results of a meta-analysis of the association between BCL2 expression and both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in female breast cancer.

Methods

Reports published in 1994-2006 were selected for the meta-analysis using a search of PubMed. Studies that investigated the role of BCL2 expression by immunohistochemistry with a sample size greater than 100 were included. Seventeen papers reported the results of 18 different series including 5,892 cases with an average median follow-up of 92.1 months.

Results

Eight studies investigated DFS unadjusted for other variables in 2,285 cases. The relative hazard estimates ranged from 0.85 - 3.03 with a combined random effects estimate of 1.66 (95%CI 1.25 - 2.22). The effect of BCL2 on DFS adjusted for other prognostic factors was reported in 11 studies and the pooled random effects hazard ratio estimate was 1.58 (95%CI 1.29-1.94). OS was investigated unadjusted for other variables in eight studies incorporating 3,910 cases. The hazard estimates ranged from 0.99-4.31 with a pooled estimate of risk of 1.64 (95%CI 1.36-2.0). OS adjusted for other parameters was evaluated in nine series comprising 3,624 cases and the estimates for these studies ranged from 1.10 to 2.49 with a pooled estimate of 1.37 (95%CI 1.19-1.58).

Conclusion

The meta-analysis strongly supports the prognostic role of BCL2 as assessed by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer and shows that this effect is independent of lymph node status, tumour size and tumour grade as well as a range of other biological variables on multi-variate analysis. Large prospective studies are now needed to establish the clinical utility of BCL2 as an independent prognostic marker.

SUBMITTER: Callagy GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2430210 | biostudies-literature | 2008 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Callagy Grace M GM Webber Mark J MJ Pharoah Paul D P PD Caldas Carlos C

BMC cancer 20080529

<h4>Background</h4>A number of protein markers have been investigated as prognostic adjuncts in breast cancer but their translation into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of appropriate validation. Recently, we showed that BCL2 protein expression had prognostic power independent of current used standards. Here, we present the results of a meta-analysis of the association between BCL2 expression and both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in female breast cancer.<h4> ...[more]

PMID: 18510726

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer is heterogeneous and the existing prognostic classifiers are limited in accuracy, leading to unnecessary treatment of numerous women. B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), an antiapoptotic protein, has been proposed as a prognostic marker, but this effect is considered to relate to oestrogen receptor (ER) status. This study aimed to test the clinical validity of BCL2 as an independent prognostic marker.MethodsFive studies of 11 212 women with early-stage breast cancer were analysed. Individual patient data included tumour size, grade, lymph node status, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy and mortality. BCL2, ER, progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) levels were determined in all tumours. A Cox model incorporating the time-dependent effects of each variable was used to explore the prognostic significance of BCL2.ResultsIn univariate analysis, ER, PR and BCL2 positivity was associated with improved survival and HER2 positivity with inferior survival. For ER and PR this effect was time dependent, whereas for BCL2 and HER2 the effect persisted over time. In multivariate analysis, BCL2 positivity retained independent prognostic significance (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.88, P<0.001). BCL2 was a powerful prognostic marker in ER- (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74, P<0.001) and ER+ disease (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.65, P<0.001), and in HER2- (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49-0.61, P<0.001) and HER2+ disease (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, P<0.001), irrespective of the type of adjuvant therapy received. Addition of BCL2 to the Adjuvant! Online prognostic model, for a subset of cases with a 10-year follow-up, improved the survival prediction (P=0.0039).ConclusionsBCL2 is an independent indicator of favourable prognosis for all types of early-stage breast cancer. This study establishes the rationale for introduction of BCL2 immunohistochemistry to improve prognostic stratification. Further work is now needed to ascertain the exact way to apply BCL2 testing for risk stratification and to standardise BCL2 immunohistochemistry for this application.

Project description:BackgroundHOTAIR, a newly discovered long intergenic noncoding RNA (lincRNA), has been reported to be aberrantly expressed in many types of cancers. This meta-analysis summarizes its potential role as a biomarker in malignancy.MethodsA quantitative meta-analysis was performed through a systematic search in Pubmed, Medline and Web of Science for eligible papers on the prognostic impact of HOTAIR in cancer from inception to Feb. 28, 2014. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to summarize the effect.ResultsNineteen studies were included in the study, with a total of 2033 patients. A significant association was observed between high HOTAIR expression and poor overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer (pooled HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.68-2.93). Place of residence (Asian or Western countries), type of cancer (digestive or non-digestive disease), sample size (more or less than 100), and paper quality (score more or less than 85%) did not alter the significant predictive value of HOTAIR in OS from various kinds of cancer but preoperative status did. By combining HRs from Cox multivariate analyses, we found that HOTAIR expression was an independent prognostic factor for cancer patients (pooled HR 2.26, 95% CI: 1.62-3.15). Subgroup analysis showed that HOTAIR abundance was an independent prognostic factor for cancer metastasis (HR 3.90, 95% CI: 2.25-6.74). For esophageal carcinoma, high HOTAIR expression was significantly associated with TNM stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR 6.90, 95% CI: 2.81-16.9) without heterogeneity. In gastric cancer, HOTAIR expression was found to be significantly associated with lymph node metastases (present vs. absent: OR 4.47, 95% CI: 1.88-10.63) and vessel invasion (positive vs. negative: OR 2.88, 95% CI: 1.38-6.04) without obvious heterogeneity.ConclusionsHOTAIR abundance may serve as a novel predictive factor for poor prognosis in different types of cancers in both Asian and Western countries.

Project description:BackgroundAberrant expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) is associated with cancer progression, initiation and metastasis. MiR34a is a miRNA that has been previously described as a tumour suppressor. Herein, we assess the expression of miR34a in three independent breast cancer cohorts using a quantitative in situ hybridisation assay (qISH) and determined its association with disease-specific death in breast cancer.MethodsThe qISH method was applied to three independent primary breast cancer cohorts (Cohort 1 with 461, Cohort 2 with 279 and Cohort 3 with 795 patients) using 5' and 3' double DIG-labelled LNA-modified probe against miR34a using the protocol described previously. Level of expression measured as automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) score for miR34a was determined for each patient and assessed for association with risk of disease-specific death. An optimal cutpoint was determined using the X-tile software for disease-specific survival in Cohort 1 and this cutpoint was then applied to the other two cohorts after median normalisation of AQUA scores.ResultsLoss of miR34a is associated with poor outcome in three independent breast cancer cohorts (uncorrected log-rank P=0.0188 for Cohort 1, log-rank P=0.0024 for Cohort 2 and log-rank P=0.0455 for Cohort 3). In all three cohorts, loss of miR34a is able to stratify patients with poor disease-specific survival among node-negative patients, but not in node-positive population. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis in Cohort 1 (P=0.0381) and Cohort 2 (P=0.0468) revealed that loss of miR34a is associated with poor outcome, independent of age, node status, receptor status and tumour size.ConclusionLoss of the tumour suppressor, miR34a, identifies a subgroup of breast cancer patients with poor disease-specific survival. This study is consistent with the well-established preclinical observations for miR34a as a tumour suppressor and suggests that miR34a may have future value as a biomarker in breast cancer.

Dataset Information

Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets