Dataset Information

A review of topotecan in combination chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

ABSTRACT: Treatment of advanced, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer includes radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Radiation has been the primary treatment modality for locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. Concomitant systemic cisplatin chemotherapy and radiation have shown high response rates with improvements in durable remissions and overall survival. Cisplatin has been the standard medication for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Combinations with other chemotherapeutic agents have been the subject of clinical trials with varying results. The toxicity of combination chemotherapy and tolerability of patients are other factors that should be considered in the management of patients with advanced disease. Recently topotecan, in combination with cisplatin, achieved increased response and overall survival rates without further compromising the patients' quality of life. This review focuses on the mechanism of action and toxicities of topotecan, as well as its role as a radio-sensitizer and chemotherapeutic agent in the management of advanced, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer. Other combination modalities and dosages are also discussed.

SUBMITTER: Robati M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2503656 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A review of topotecan in combination chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

Robati Minoo M Holtz David D Dunton Charles J CJ

Therapeutics and clinical risk management 20080201 1

Treatment of advanced, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer includes radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Radiation has been the primary treatment modality for locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. Concomitant systemic cisplatin chemotherapy and radiation have shown high response rates with improvements in durable remissions and overall survival. Cisplatin has been the standard medication for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Combinations with other chemotherapeutic agents have been the ...[more]

PMID: 18728710

Similar Datasets

Project description:As increased angiogenesis has been linked with the progression of ovarian cancer, a number of anti-angiogenic agents have been investigated, or are currently in development, as potential treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Bevacizumab, a recombinant monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, has gained European Medicines Agency approval for the front-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, and for the treatment of first recurrence of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer in combination with carboplatin and gemcitabine. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify available efficacy and safety data for bevacizumab in ovarian cancer as well as for newer anti-angiogenic agents in development. We analyzed published data from randomized, controlled phase II/III clinical trials enrolling women with ovarian cancer to receive treatment with bevacizumab. We also reviewed available data for emerging anti-angiogenic agents currently in phase II/III development, including trebananib, aflibercept, nintedanib, cediranib, imatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib. Significant efficacy gains were achieved with the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy in four randomized, double-blind, phase III trials, both as front-line treatment (GOG-0218 and ICON7) and in patients with recurrent disease (OCEANS and AURELIA). The type and frequency of bevacizumab-related adverse events was as expected in these studies based on published data. Promising efficacy data have been published for a number of emerging anti-angiogenic agents in phase III development for advanced ovarian cancer. Further research is needed to identify predictive or prognostic markers of response to bevacizumab in order to optimize patient selection and treatment benefit. Data from phase III trials of newer anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer are awaited.

Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer and the effect of optimal combination timing on prognosis.MethodsFrom March 2020 to December 2021, the clinical data of 116 patients with advanced cervical cancer who received PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy were collected. The clinical characteristics and adverse events of the patients were recorded until the cut-off date of follow-up. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), and safety; the secondary endpoints were the disease-control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the prognostic factors affecting the PFS of patients and to assess the effect of the timing of combination therapies on PFS.ResultsIn total, 85 patients from 4 study centers were included in this study. The median PFS was 10.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.47-11.13 months], the ORR was 44.7%, the DCR was 75.3%, and the median OS was not reached. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the early combination of chemotherapy with a PD-1 inhibitor provided better PFS than the late combination [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, P=0.001]. Lymph node metastasis (HR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.24-3.38, P=0.005), and previous treatment (HR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.09-3.00, P=0.023) were also independent risk factors for PFS. During the treatment and follow-up periods, the overall incidence of adverse events in this study was 56.5%, and that of grade ≥3 adverse events was 12.9%. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and hypothyroidism were the main treatment-related adverse events, all of which were tolerated, and no serious adverse events leading to death were observed. There were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionsPD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have good efficacy and controllable safety in patients with advanced cervical cancer. The early combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy may provide better survival benefits than the late combination for patients.

Project description:An alternative or follow-up adjunct to conventional maximum tolerated dose (MTD) chemotherapy now in advanced phase III clinical trial assessment is metronomic chemotherapy--the close regular administration of low doses of drug with no prolonged breaks. A number of preclinical studies have shown metronomic chemotherapy can cause long term survival of mice with advanced cancer, including metastatic disease, in the absence of overt toxicity, especially when combined with targeted antiangiogenic drugs. However, similar to MTD chemotherapy acquired resistance eventually develops, the basis of which is unknown. Using a preclinical model of advanced human ovarian (SKOV-3-13) cancer in SCID mice, we show that acquired resistance can develop after terminating prolonged (over 3 months) successful therapy utilizing daily oral metronomic topotecan plus pazopanib, an oral antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Two resistant sublines were isolated from a single mouse, one from a solid tumor (called KH092-7SD, referred to as 7SD) and another from ascites tumor cells (called KH092-7AS, referred to as 7AS). Using these sublines we show acquired resistance to the combination treatment is due to tumor cell alterations that confer relative refractoriness to topotecan. The resistant phenotype is heritable, associated with reduced cellular uptake of topotecan and could not be reversed by switching to MTD topotecan or to another topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, CPT-11, given either in a metronomic or MTD manner nor switching to another antiangiogenic drug, e.g. the anti-VEGFR-2 antibody, DC101, or another TKI, sunitinib. Thus, in this case cross resistance seems to exist between MTD and metronomic topotecan, the basis of which is unknown. However, gene expression profiling revealed several potential genes that are stably upregulated in the resistant lines, that previously have been implicated in resistance to various chemotherapy drugs, and which, therefore, may contribute to the drug resistant phenotype.

Project description:ObjectiveWhile primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is considered the standard of care for women who present with stage IV endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy. We summarized the literature and compared outcomes of PCS compared to NACT and ICS.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2020. Key search terms included multiple descriptors of advanced disease status in combination with "endometrial cancer" and "neoadjuvant chemotherapy". Our review included studies that examined survival and surgical outcomes of patients with stage III or IV endometrial cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery versus those who received primary cytoreductive surgery. We excluded studies examining only patients with leiomyosarcomas, carcinosarcomas, and stromal sarcomas due to the biologic heterogeneity of these malignancies.ResultsThe nine included studies encompassed 5,844 patients, of which 1,317 (22.5%) received NACT and 4,527 received PCS (77.5%). With the exception of a single study, all were retrospective observational studies or case series. Use of NACT in patients with stage IV EC increased from 16.0% in 2010 to 23.9% in 2015. Five studies analyzed median overall survival and all but one reported no significant difference between NACT + ICS vs. PCS. Optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm of residual disease) rates were similar across both treatment groups in three separate analyses, however pooled data suggest improved rates of optimal cytoreduction for NACT + ICS vs. PCS patients (81.9% vs. 51.5% respectively). Patients receiving NACT experienced significantly shorter hospital admissions and lower operative times compared to PCS counterparts.ConclusionsNACT followed by ICS reduces perioperative morbidity while offering similar overall survival.

Dataset Information

A review of topotecan in combination chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

Publications

A review of topotecan in combination chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets