Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Public involvement in modernising genitourinary medicine clinics: using general public and patient opinion to influence models of service delivery.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: To determine which of the options available to modernise genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in the UK are most acceptable to patients and potential patients; to assess whether the views of a general population sample differ from those of clinic attenders. . METHODS: A questionnaire was used to explore the acceptability of different ways of delivering sexual healthcare including the potential trade-off between convenience/range of services with cost/staffing constraints. Potential differences in responses by age, sex, ethnicity and current attendance at a GUM clinic were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: 542 respondents in the community and 202 clinic attenders provided responses. Delivery of sexual healthcare by specialist nurses and general practitioners was acceptable to 81% and 72% of interviewees, respectively, assuming common protocols were adhered to. The proportion of individuals who would accept a consultation with a nurse increased to 91% if the waiting time for an appointment could be reduced as a result. Men were less likely to accept a consultation with a nurse (odds ratio (OR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 0.79), and Asian (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.64) and other black (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.87) ethnic groups were less likely to accept a consultation with a general practitioner. 44% of patients preferred walk-in clinics even if waiting times for an appointment were reduced to 48 h. CONCLUSION: Delivery of sexual healthcare by nurses and general practitioners was generally found to be acceptable, although this varies by patient sex and ethnicity. Some differences exist between the preferences of a general population sample compared with clinic attenders, but overall there is a high level of concordance. Walk-in clinics remain a popular choice even when appointment waiting times are short.

SUBMITTER: Ross JD 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2563868 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Public involvement in modernising genitourinary medicine clinics: using general public and patient opinion to influence models of service delivery.

Ross J D C JD   Copas A A   Stephenson J J   Fellows L L   Gilleran G G  

Sexually transmitted infections 20060606 6


<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine which of the options available to modernise genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in the UK are most acceptable to patients and potential patients; to assess whether the views of a general population sample differ from those of clinic attenders. .<h4>Methods</h4>A questionnaire was used to explore the acceptability of different ways of delivering sexual healthcare including the potential trade-off between convenience/range of services with cost/staffing constraints  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7511693 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7688181 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5433532 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4437297 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6049982 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9292232 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7787909 | biostudies-literature