Dataset Information

Accident and emergency training perspectives in Scotland.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the perspectives of Scottish accident and emergency (A&E) trainees and trainers on current training in the speciality, in order to help develop a simulator based training programme to complement existing training.

Methods

Questionnaires were sent to all Scottish A&E trainees and consultants responsible for training. They were presented with various clinical challenges. Trainees were asked to rate their confidence, experience, knowledge, and training on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Trainers were asked to identify those areas where they felt trainees' performance consistently failed to meet a desired standard, and whether this was the result of lack of training, lack of exposure, or both.

Results

Trainees' response rate was 75%; consultants' was 59.4%. Overall trainees gave scores of 4/5 for confidence and knowledge, 3/5 for experience, and 2/5 for training. The highest scores were for medical, anaesthetics, and interpersonal skills. Consultants attributed lack of exposure to underperformance more frequently than lack of training.

Conclusions

Trainees and trainers agree on the level of exposure to various clinical challenges, but disagree on training. Trainees' levels of confidence and knowledge outweigh their experience and training, suggesting that trainees associate knowledge with clinical competence.

SUBMITTER: McGugan LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2579540 | biostudies-literature | 2006 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Accident and emergency training perspectives in Scotland.

McGugan L A LA Maran N J NJ Glavin R R Nichol N N

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 20060701 7

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the perspectives of Scottish accident and emergency (A&E) trainees and trainers on current training in the speciality, in order to help develop a simulator based training programme to complement existing training.<h4>Methods</h4>Questionnaires were sent to all Scottish A&E trainees and consultants responsible for training. They were presented with various clinical challenges. Trainees were asked to rate their confidence, experience, knowledge, and training on a Lik ...[more]

PMID: 16794090

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesFollowing the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and the subsequent global spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), health systems and the populations who use them have faced unprecedented challenges. We aimed to measure the impact of COVID-19 on the uptake of hospital-based care at a national level.DesignThe study period (weeks ending 5 January to 28 June 2020) encompassed the pandemic announcement by the World Health Organization and the initiation of the UK lockdown. We undertook an interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate the impact of these events on hospital services at a national level and across demographics, clinical specialties and National Health Service Health Boards.SettingScotland, UK.ParticipantsPatients receiving hospital care from National Health Service Scotland.Main outcome measuresAccident and emergency (A&E) attendances, and emergency and planned hospital admissions measured using the relative change of weekly counts in 2020 to the averaged counts for equivalent weeks in 2018 and 2019.ResultsBefore the pandemic announcement, the uptake of hospital care was largely consistent with historical levels. This was followed by sharp drops in all outcomes until UK lockdown, where activity began to steadily increase. This time-period saw an average reduction of -40.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -47.7 to -33.7) in A&E attendances, -25.8% (95% CI: -31.1 to -20.4) in emergency hospital admissions and -60.9% (95% CI: -66.1 to -55.7) in planned hospital admissions, in comparison to the 2018-2019 averages. All subgroup trends were broadly consistent within outcomes, but with notable variations across age groups, specialties and geography.ConclusionsCOVID-19 has had a profoundly disruptive impact on hospital-based care across National Health Service Scotland. This has likely led to an adverse effect on non-COVID-19-related illnesses, increasing the possibility of potentially avoidable morbidity and mortality. Further research is required to elucidate these impacts.

Project description:BackgroundThere is limited understanding of the drivers of increasing infant accident and emergency (A&E) attendances and emergency hospital admissions across England. We examine variations in use of emergency hospital services among infants by local areas in England and investigate the extent to which infant and socio-economic factors explain these variations.MethodsBirth cohort study using linked administrative Hospital Episode Statistics data in England. Singleton live births between 1-April-2012 and 31-March-2019 were followed up for 1 year; from 1-April-2013 (from the discharge date of their birth admission) until their first birthday, death or 31-March-2019. Mixed effects negative binomial models were used to calculate incidence rate ratios for A&E attendances and emergency admissions and mixed effects logistic regression models estimated odds ratio of conversion (the proportion of infants subsequently admitted after attending A&E). Models were adjusted for individual-level factors and included a random effect for local authority (LA).ResultsThe cohort comprised 3,665,414 births in 150 English LAs. Rates of A&E attendances and emergency admissions were highest amongst: infants born < 32 weeks gestation; with presence of congenital anomaly; and to mothers < 20-years-old. Area-level deprivation was positively associated with A&E attendance rates, but not associated with conversion probability. A&E attendance rates were highest in the North East (916 per 1000 child-years, 95%CI: 911 to 921) and London (876 per 1000, 95%CI: 874 to 879), yet London had the lowest emergency admission rates (232 per 1000, 95%CI: 231 to 234) and conversion probability (25% vs 39% in South West). Adjusting for individual-level factors did not significantly affect variability in A&E attendance and emergency admission rates by local authority.ConclusionsDrivers of A&E attendances and emergency admissions include individual-level factors such being born premature, with congenital anomaly and from socio-economically disadvantaged young parent families. Support for such vulnerable infants and families should be provided alongside preventative health care in primary and community care settings. The impact of these services requires further investigation. Substantial geographical variations in rates were not explained by individual-level factors. This suggests more detailed understanding of local and underlying service-level factors would provide targets for further research on mechanisms and policy priority.

Dataset Information

Accident and emergency training perspectives in Scotland.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Accident and emergency training perspectives in Scotland.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets