Dataset Information

Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

ABSTRACT: Retinal rods and cones share a phototransduction pathway involving cyclic GMP. Cones are typically 100 times less photosensitive than rods and their response kinetics are several times faster, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Almost all proteins involved in phototransduction have distinct rod and cone variants. Differences in properties between rod and cone pigments have been described, such as a 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state (active conformation) of cone pigment and its higher rate of spontaneous isomerization, but their contributions to the functional differences between rods and cones remain speculative. We have addressed this question by expressing human or salamander red cone pigment in Xenopus rods, and human rod pigment in Xenopus cones. Here we show that rod and cone pigments when present in the same cell produce light responses with identical amplification and kinetics, thereby ruling out any difference in their signalling properties. However, red cone pigment isomerizes spontaneously 10,000 times more frequently than rod pigment. This high spontaneous activity adapts the native cones even in darkness, making them less sensitive and kinetically faster than rods. Nevertheless, additional factors are probably involved in these differences.

SUBMITTER: Kefalov V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2581816 | biostudies-literature | 2003 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Kefalov Vladimir V Fu Yingbin Y Marsh-Armstrong Nicholas N Yau King-Wai KW

Nature 20031001 6957

Retinal rods and cones share a phototransduction pathway involving cyclic GMP. Cones are typically 100 times less photosensitive than rods and their response kinetics are several times faster, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Almost all proteins involved in phototransduction have distinct rod and cone variants. Differences in properties between rod and cone pigments have been described, such as a 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state (active conformation) of cone pig ...[more]

PMID: 14523449

Similar Datasets

Project description:As part of the visual cycle, the retinal chromophore in both rod and cone visual pigments undergoes reversible Schiff base hydrolysis and dissociation following photobleaching. We characterized light-activated release of retinal from a short-wavelength-sensitive cone pigment (VCOP) in 0.1% dodecyl maltoside using fluorescence spectroscopy. The half-time (t(1/2)) of release of retinal from VCOP was 7.1 s, 250-fold faster than that of rhodopsin. VCOP exhibited pH-dependent release kinetics, with the t(1/2) decreasing from 23 to 4 s with the pH decreasing from 4.1 to 8, respectively. However, the Arrhenius activation energy (E(a)) for VCOP derived from kinetic measurements between 4 and 20 °C was 17.4 kcal/mol, similar to the value of 18.5 kcal/mol for rhodopsin. There was a small kinetic isotope (D(2)O) effect in VCOP, but this effect was smaller than that observed in rhodopsin. Mutation of the primary Schiff base counterion (VCOP(D108A)) produced a pigment with an unprotonated chromophore (?(max) = 360 nm) and dramatically slowed (t(1/2) ~ 6.8 min) light-dependent retinal release. Using homology modeling, a VCOP mutant with two substitutions (S85D and D108A) was designed to move the counterion one ?-helical turn into the transmembrane region from the native position. This double mutant had a UV-visible absorption spectrum consistent with a protonated Schiff base (?(max) = 420 nm). Moreover, the VCOP(S85D/D108A) mutant had retinal release kinetics (t(1/2) = 7 s) and an E(a) (18 kcal/mol) similar to those of the native pigment exhibiting no pH dependence. By contrast, the single mutant VCOP(S85D) had an ~3-fold decreased retinal release rate compared to that of the native pigment. Photoactivated VCOP(D108A) had kinetics comparable to those of a rhodopsin counterion mutant, Rho(E113Q), both requiring hydroxylamine to fully release retinal. These results demonstrate that the primary counterion of cone visual pigments is necessary for efficient Schiff base hydrolysis. We discuss how the large differences in retinal release rates between rod and cone visual pigments arise, not from inherent differences in the rate of Schiff base hydrolysis but rather from differences in the properties of noncovalent binding of the retinal chromophore to the protein.

Project description:Cone rod dystrophies (CRDs) (prevalence 1/40,000) are inherited retinal dystrophies that belong to the group of pigmentary retinopathies. CRDs are characterized by retinal pigment deposits visible on fundus examination, predominantly localized to the macular region. In contrast to typical retinitis pigmentosa (RP), also called the rod cone dystrophies (RCDs) resulting from the primary loss in rod photoreceptors and later followed by the secondary loss in cone photoreceptors, CRDs reflect the opposite sequence of events. CRD is characterized by primary cone involvement, or, sometimes, by concomitant loss of both cones and rods that explains the predominant symptoms of CRDs: decreased visual acuity, color vision defects, photoaversion and decreased sensitivity in the central visual field, later followed by progressive loss in peripheral vision and night blindness. The clinical course of CRDs is generally more severe and rapid than that of RCDs, leading to earlier legal blindness and disability. At end stage, however, CRDs do not differ from RCDs. CRDs are most frequently non syndromic, but they may also be part of several syndromes, such as Bardet Biedl syndrome and Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 (SCA7). Non syndromic CRDs are genetically heterogeneous (ten cloned genes and three loci have been identified so far). The four major causative genes involved in the pathogenesis of CRDs are ABCA4 (which causes Stargardt disease and also 30 to 60% of autosomal recessive CRDs), CRX and GUCY2D (which are responsible for many reported cases of autosomal dominant CRDs), and RPGR (which causes about 2/3 of X-linked RP and also an undetermined percentage of X-linked CRDs). It is likely that highly deleterious mutations in genes that otherwise cause RP or macular dystrophy may also lead to CRDs. The diagnosis of CRDs is based on clinical history, fundus examination and electroretinogram. Molecular diagnosis can be made for some genes, genetic counseling is always advised. Currently, there is no therapy that stops the evolution of the disease or restores the vision, and the visual prognosis is poor. Management aims at slowing down the degenerative process, treating the complications and helping patients to cope with the social and psychological impact of blindness.

Dataset Information

Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Publications

Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets